Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whether or not it was a Proud Boy or a homeless drug addict who assaulted Pelosi, the assault itself is a force multiplier. The assault will give pause to all sorts of Democrats in Congress who think, if this could happen in a Democratic Speaker's home, then what could happen to any of us. You'll get Democrat representatives being less aggressive in Congress, Democrats less willing to run for Congress, Democrats less willing to volunteer for political campaigns, and Democrats less willing to vote.

The cost to political participation then for Democrats will be higher than for Republicans, who are far less likely to face any of these things. Yes, Steve Scalise says hi, but the one crazy person going after him is the exception that proves the rule.

What an idiotic post. Truly.
Look back over the past few years and just think for a minute.

Rand Paul. Lee Zeldin. Just recently - a staffer for Rubio.
Then, there is the aborted assassination on Kavanaugh.
Then of course, Steve Scalise and all the other Republicans who were targeted on the baseball field.
Tell us you didn't really think before you posted.

I see what you did there

Paul’s was a neighbor dispute. Zeldin’s was a deranged veteran who had no idea who Zeldin was. The Rubio canvasser thing wasn’t political, just wrong place at wrong time. Kavanaugh story was helpful at the time but wasn’t true. Scalise as PP said was exception that proves the rule.

Fact is, it’s smart to be a Republican. Safer.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whether or not it was a Proud Boy or a homeless drug addict who assaulted Pelosi, the assault itself is a force multiplier. The assault will give pause to all sorts of Democrats in Congress who think, if this could happen in a Democratic Speaker's home, then what could happen to any of us. You'll get Democrat representatives being less aggressive in Congress, Democrats less willing to run for Congress, Democrats less willing to volunteer for political campaigns, and Democrats less willing to vote.

The cost to political participation then for Democrats will be higher than for Republicans, who are far less likely to face any of these things. Yes, Steve Scalise says hi, but the one crazy person going after him is the exception that proves the rule.

What an idiotic post. Truly.
Look back over the past few years and just think for a minute.

Rand Paul. Lee Zeldin. Just recently - a staffer for Rubio.
Then, there is the aborted assassination on Kavanaugh.
Then of course, Steve Scalise and all the other Republicans who were targeted on the baseball field.
Tell us you didn't really think before you posted.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whether or not it was a Proud Boy or a homeless drug addict who assaulted Pelosi, the assault itself is a force multiplier. The assault will give pause to all sorts of Democrats in Congress who think, if this could happen in a Democratic Speaker's home, then what could happen to any of us. You'll get Democrat representatives being less aggressive in Congress, Democrats less willing to run for Congress, Democrats less willing to volunteer for political campaigns, and Democrats less willing to vote.

The cost to political participation then for Democrats will be higher than for Republicans, who are far less likely to face any of these things. Yes, Steve Scalise says hi, but the one crazy person going after him is the exception that proves the rule.

What an idiotic post. Truly.
Look back over the past few years and just think for a minute.

Rand Paul. Lee Zeldin. Just recently - a staffer for Rubio.
Then, there is the aborted assassination on Kavanaugh.
Then of course, Steve Scalise and all the other Republicans who were targeted on the baseball field.
Tell us you didn't really think before you posted.

I see what you did there

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Pelosi house was specifically targeted and he was beaten with a hammer.
https://apnews.com/article/paul-pelosi-assaulted-156ece77186eb11b97260af3c5122f67

“The attack was not random”. What kind of animal beats an 82 year old spouse of a political rival with a hammer? A maggot.

The modern GOP.

Either you are fine with it, or you vote against it.

Sadly...

What are you going to do when it is revealed that the perp is some deranged homeless person high on all of the legalized drugs SF allows?

It's almost as if we should wait for the facts to come out.

It’s almost as if the facts that have already come out indicate that their house was targeted, so not a deranged homeless person.

Does anyone know where Kanye was last night?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Pelosi house was specifically targeted and he was beaten with a hammer.
https://apnews.com/article/paul-pelosi-assaulted-156ece77186eb11b97260af3c5122f67

“The attack was not random”. What kind of animal beats an 82 year old spouse of a political rival with a hammer? A maggot.

The modern GOP.

Either you are fine with it, or you vote against it.

Sadly...

What are you going to do when it is revealed that the perp is some deranged homeless person high on all of the legalized drugs SF allows?

It's almost as if we should wait for the facts to come out.

It’s almost as if the facts that have already come out indicate that their house was targeted, so not a deranged homeless person.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whether or not it was a Proud Boy or a homeless drug addict who assaulted Pelosi, the assault itself is a force multiplier. The assault will give pause to all sorts of Democrats in Congress who think, if this could happen in a Democratic Speaker's home, then what could happen to any of us. You'll get Democrat representatives being less aggressive in Congress, Democrats less willing to run for Congress, Democrats less willing to volunteer for political campaigns, and Democrats less willing to vote.

The cost to political participation then for Democrats will be higher than for Republicans, who are far less likely to face any of these things. Yes, Steve Scalise says hi, but the one crazy person going after him is the exception that proves the rule.

What an idiotic post. Truly.
Look back over the past few years and just think for a minute.

Rand Paul. Lee Zeldin. Just recently - a staffer for Rubio.
Then, there is the aborted assassination on Kavanaugh.
Then of course, Steve Scalise and all the other Republicans who were targeted on the baseball field.
Tell us you didn't really think before you posted.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whether or not it was a Proud Boy or a homeless drug addict who assaulted Pelosi, the assault itself is a force multiplier. The assault will give pause to all sorts of Democrats in Congress who think, if this could happen in a Democratic Speaker's home, then what could happen to any of us. You'll get Democrat representatives being less aggressive in Congress, Democrats less willing to run for Congress, Democrats less willing to volunteer for political campaigns, and Democrats less willing to vote.

The cost to political participation then for Democrats will be higher than for Republicans, who are far less likely to face any of these things. Yes, Steve Scalise says hi, but the one crazy person going after him is the exception that proves the rule.

What an idiotic post. Truly.
Look back over the past few years and just think for a minute.

Rand Paul. Lee Zeldin. Just recently - a staffer for Rubio.
Then, there is the aborted assassination on Kavanaugh.
Then of course, Steve Scalise and all the other Republicans who were targeted on the baseball field.
Tell us you didn't really think before you posted.

So you are saying this is no big deal because Rand Paul was beaten by his neighbor. Okay.

Anonymous wrote:Whether or not it was a Proud Boy or a homeless drug addict who assaulted Pelosi, the assault itself is a force multiplier. The assault will give pause to all sorts of Democrats in Congress who think, if this could happen in a Democratic Speaker's home, then what could happen to any of us. You'll get Democrat representatives being less aggressive in Congress, Democrats less willing to run for Congress, Democrats less willing to volunteer for political campaigns, and Democrats less willing to vote.

The cost to political participation then for Democrats will be higher than for Republicans, who are far less likely to face any of these things. Yes, Steve Scalise says hi, but the one crazy person going after him is the exception that proves the rule.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Pelosi house was specifically targeted and he was beaten with a hammer.
https://apnews.com/article/paul-pelosi-assaulted-156ece77186eb11b97260af3c5122f67

“The attack was not random”. What kind of animal beats an 82 year old spouse of a political rival with a hammer? A maggot.

The modern GOP.

Either you are fine with it, or you vote against it.

Sadly...

What are you going to do when it is revealed that the perp is some deranged homeless person high on all of the legalized drugs SF allows?

It's almost as if we should wait for the facts to come out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whether or not it was a Proud Boy or a homeless drug addict who assaulted Pelosi, the assault itself is a force multiplier. The assault will give pause to all sorts of Democrats in Congress who think, if this could happen in a Democratic Speaker's home, then what could happen to any of us. You'll get Democrat representatives being less aggressive in Congress, Democrats less willing to run for Congress, Democrats less willing to volunteer for political campaigns, and Democrats less willing to vote.

The cost to political participation then for Democrats will be higher than for Republicans, who are far less likely to face any of these things. Yes, Steve Scalise says hi, but the one crazy person going after him is the exception that proves the rule.

What an idiotic post. Truly.
Look back over the past few years and just think for a minute.

Rand Paul. Lee Zeldin. Just recently - a staffer for Rubio.
Then, there is the aborted assassination on Kavanaugh.
Then of course, Steve Scalise and all the other Republicans who were targeted on the baseball field.
Tell us you didn't really think before you posted.

Anonymous wrote:Whether or not it was a Proud Boy or a homeless drug addict who assaulted Pelosi, the assault itself is a force multiplier. The assault will give pause to all sorts of Democrats in Congress who think, if this could happen in a Democratic Speaker's home, then what could happen to any of us. You'll get Democrat representatives being less aggressive in Congress, Democrats less willing to run for Congress, Democrats less willing to volunteer for political campaigns, and Democrats less willing to vote.

The cost to political participation then for Democrats will be higher than for Republicans, who are far less likely to face any of these things. Yes, Steve Scalise says hi, but the one crazy person going after him is the exception that proves the rule.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Pelosi house was specifically targeted and he was beaten with a hammer.
https://apnews.com/article/paul-pelosi-assaulted-156ece77186eb11b97260af3c5122f67

“The attack was not random”. What kind of animal beats an 82 year old spouse of a political rival with a hammer? A maggot.

The modern GOP.

Either you are fine with it, or you vote against it.

Sadly...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Pelosi house was specifically targeted and he was beaten with a hammer.
https://apnews.com/article/paul-pelosi-assaulted-156ece77186eb11b97260af3c5122f67

“The attack was not random”. What kind of animal beats an 82 year old spouse of a political rival with a hammer? A maggot.

Anonymous wrote:The Pelosi house was specifically targeted and he was beaten with a hammer.
https://apnews.com/article/paul-pelosi-assaulted-156ece77186eb11b97260af3c5122f67