Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you have extended time, go ACT.
Not true, the ACT is longer to begin with, this is the last thing a kid who struggles with attention span or processing speed needs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most Start with SAT I think, explore ACT only if can’t score well with SAT
Do the AO’s think so?
Most kids do SAT so there must be reasons they opt for the ACT..
Explained above. Often strongest students take the ACT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most Start with SAT I think, explore ACT only if can’t score well with SAT
Do the AO’s think so?
Most kids do SAT so there must be reasons they opt for the ACT..
Anonymous wrote:Also SAT us going digital and will become a "progressive" test meaning sections will get harder based on how kid does on early questions. The current HS freshmen will be the first ones to take this in the US.
That alone makes me think that the ACT might be better since it's staying paper based and same format.
Less variability and my kid hates the progressive test thing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most Start with SAT I think, explore ACT only if can’t score well with SAT
Do the AO’s think so?
Anonymous wrote:If you have extended time, go ACT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most Start with SAT I think, explore ACT only if can’t score well with SAT
Do the AO’s think so?
Anonymous wrote:If it might at all work for you, mine loved being done relatively early with standardized testing. They did the ACT. Done by late spring junior year. Having the summer before senior year free to get their college essay drafted and college app plans firmed up, without the burden of more tests looming, really helped. They had a fair amount of homework too, for senior year classes. No more ACT meant they could have some free time. It doesn't work for everyone but I wanted to share that that was so nice.
Anonymous wrote:Most Start with SAT I think, explore ACT only if can’t score well with SAT