Anonymous wrote:The APS way is to survey the community without truly considering their input. Their decision is made. It is option 1 regardless of the negative feedback they will receive. Take it to the bank from an APS teacher familiar with some of their decision making processes. I’m sure they had a meeting with all the central office people recently added to go over for the wording for this little press release. Shortening our summer, adding days and minutes to the school day. Thanks APS for showing your appreciation during the teacher shortage.
Anonymous wrote:Is it true that if you pull your kid out for a religious holiday that APS does not observe, it’s an unexcused absence? Someone over on AEM is trying to say that. Complaining that her kids won’t get off for the holiday so will now take an unexcused absence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it true that if you pull your kid out for a religious holiday that APS does not observe, it’s an unexcused absence? Someone over on AEM is trying to say that. Complaining that her kids won’t get off for the holiday so will now take an unexcused absence.
No. That’s excused, obviously. Number 4 on the first page of the attendance policy.
https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/arlington/Board.nsf/files/CEQKRJ52C268/$file/J-5.1.30%20Attendance.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Is it true that if you pull your kid out for a religious holiday that APS does not observe, it’s an unexcused absence? Someone over on AEM is trying to say that. Complaining that her kids won’t get off for the holiday so will now take an unexcused absence.
Anonymous wrote:APS kids have had a total of two full weeks of school this year (with no holidays). They have a total of six this entire half year before winter break.
This new policy of adopting all the religious holidays is so frustrating and makes it really hard to get into a rhythm, for both the kids in school and their families.
Just venting. I assume there's no doing away with the new policy of a day off for every.single.religious.holiday.
(And yes, I would like to get rid of winter holidays around Christmas and spring break around Easter, too!)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really, truly don't understand how we keep starting earlier but ending at the same time. The first year it at least made logical sense, a bunch of new holidays were added in. How does option 1 start an entire week earlier than this year (where we've already added in all the holidays) yet still get out at the same time?
They have added 3-4 school days to the calendar
Are they keeping the extra minutes each day?
I haven't heard any rumblings otherwise. I know APE was advocating for a return to 180 instructional days ( I am a casual APE member)
180 vs 179. Good grief.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really, truly don't understand how we keep starting earlier but ending at the same time. The first year it at least made logical sense, a bunch of new holidays were added in. How does option 1 start an entire week earlier than this year (where we've already added in all the holidays) yet still get out at the same time?
They have added 3-4 school days to the calendar
Are they keeping the extra minutes each day?
I haven't heard any rumblings otherwise. I know APE was advocating for a return to 180 instructional days ( I am a casual APE member)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really, truly don't understand how we keep starting earlier but ending at the same time. The first year it at least made logical sense, a bunch of new holidays were added in. How does option 1 start an entire week earlier than this year (where we've already added in all the holidays) yet still get out at the same time?
They have added 3-4 school days to the calendar
Are they keeping the extra minutes each day?