Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:College.
Both of my sons went to New England prep schools (think Deerfield, Hotchkiss, etc). They each played some combo of soccer, football, ice hockey, lacrosse, baseball for every year. Recruited in one or more sports, picked the one they liked best to play in college.
Don't let people convince you they should specialize if it's a team sport. Can't speak to more individual sports like gymnastics or swimming.
Ps. Recent info, they graduated '19 and '22
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:9th grade
The intended philosophy regarding (and research promoting) multiple sports is not a whole bunch each season, but varied across the year. So, yes, multiple high level sports all at the same time is an injury risk. Total training volume should be considered.
Through late elementary my kids were able to club swim plus a travel sport (soccer or basketball). In middle school, one sport was at the club/travel level and the other wasn't quite as intense, usually "select" level, above rec, or a school sport plus the club/travel sport.
In high school, my kids made the choice to specialize.
Swimming as a second sport is a great idea but probably too late for that and it didn't go anywhere when I suggested it. DC's sports overlap. They both require an almost year-round commitment to remain competitive. Most of the other kids on the two sports that conflict have specialized by 10-12. DC is getting hurt more often than the other kids and is tired. I drank the Kool-Aid but I'm second-guessing the research.
The overlap and this belief are the problem. I'm not blaming it on you, the youth sports industry runs this way, especially around here. Families aren't left with enough choices, but it is your choice to make. Don't specialize too early, but don't play two travel sports per season...easier said than done (but almost always the right choice).
+1. Trying to do multiple sports at the club/travel level is the problem. It's too much. One club/travel plus one rec at a time (with the rec sport changing depending on season) is more realistic. If a kid likes everything equally it's probably best to stay rec for all of them until they decide on a clear favorite. I know a couple of very athletic kids who could do travel for all their sports, but they are staying in rec so they do 2-3 sports at a time with a ~2 day a week commitment for each. Pursuing multiple "favorites" at the club/travel level, with close to a year round commitment for each, sounds like a recipe for injury and burnout.
Anonymous wrote:College.
Both of my sons went to New England prep schools (think Deerfield, Hotchkiss, etc). They each played some combo of soccer, football, ice hockey, lacrosse, baseball for every year. Recruited in one or more sports, picked the one they liked best to play in college.
Don't let people convince you they should specialize if it's a team sport. Can't speak to more individual sports like gymnastics or swimming.
Anonymous wrote:College.
Both of my sons went to New England prep schools (think Deerfield, Hotchkiss, etc). They each played some combo of soccer, football, ice hockey, lacrosse, baseball for every year. Recruited in one or more sports, picked the one they liked best to play in college.
Don't let people convince you they should specialize if it's a team sport. Can't speak to more individual sports like gymnastics or swimming.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:9th grade
The intended philosophy regarding (and research promoting) multiple sports is not a whole bunch each season, but varied across the year. So, yes, multiple high level sports all at the same time is an injury risk. Total training volume should be considered.
Through late elementary my kids were able to club swim plus a travel sport (soccer or basketball). In middle school, one sport was at the club/travel level and the other wasn't quite as intense, usually "select" level, above rec, or a school sport plus the club/travel sport.
In high school, my kids made the choice to specialize.
Swimming as a second sport is a great idea but probably too late for that and it didn't go anywhere when I suggested it. DC's sports overlap. They both require an almost year-round commitment to remain competitive. Most of the other kids on the two sports that conflict have specialized by 10-12. DC is getting hurt more often than the other kids and is tired. I drank the Kool-Aid but I'm second-guessing the research.
The overlap and this belief are the problem. I'm not blaming it on you, the youth sports industry runs this way, especially around here. Families aren't left with enough choices, but it is your choice to make. Don't specialize too early, but don't play two travel sports per season...easier said than done (but almost always the right choice).