Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you approach the boss and say look, I am not sure if you consider me a good fit for this job, maybe we should talk constructive departure with severance
Was thinking of that. But the reason I don’t like it as only one month severance at work on a performance related mutually agreed termination. However a non mutually agreed lay off I can negotiate into accelerated vesting of some of my grants and maybe a bit more vesting or medical coverage a few extra weeks.
Mutually agreed is called a voluntary leaver so no unemployment. I guess me and boss dance a bit more. Guess this is good practice for retirement.
You are essentially refusing to do your job (you admit yourself you quiet quit) and yet you think your company owes you a severance?! And a longer one than they normally provide?
You definitely deserve to be fired with no severance. The entitlement is amazing.
Quiet quitting is doing your job but no more. It is not about not doing your job.![]()
I really don’t understand this term. Doing your job and no more is not quitting by any means. After all, my employer pays me my salary and no more. That’s the agreement!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you approach the boss and say look, I am not sure if you consider me a good fit for this job, maybe we should talk constructive departure with severance
Was thinking of that. But the reason I don’t like it as only one month severance at work on a performance related mutually agreed termination. However a non mutually agreed lay off I can negotiate into accelerated vesting of some of my grants and maybe a bit more vesting or medical coverage a few extra weeks.
Mutually agreed is called a voluntary leaver so no unemployment. I guess me and boss dance a bit more. Guess this is good practice for retirement.
You are essentially refusing to do your job (you admit yourself you quiet quit) and yet you think your company owes you a severance?! And a longer one than they normally provide?
You definitely deserve to be fired with no severance. The entitlement is amazing.
Quiet quitting is doing your job but no more. It is not about not doing your job.![]()
I really don’t understand this term. Doing your job and no more is not quitting by any means. After all, my employer pays me my salary and no more. That’s the agreement!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you approach the boss and say look, I am not sure if you consider me a good fit for this job, maybe we should talk constructive departure with severance
Was thinking of that. But the reason I don’t like it as only one month severance at work on a performance related mutually agreed termination. However a non mutually agreed lay off I can negotiate into accelerated vesting of some of my grants and maybe a bit more vesting or medical coverage a few extra weeks.
Mutually agreed is called a voluntary leaver so no unemployment. I guess me and boss dance a bit more. Guess this is good practice for retirement.
You are essentially refusing to do your job (you admit yourself you quiet quit) and yet you think your company owes you a severance?! And a longer one than they normally provide?
You definitely deserve to be fired with no severance. The entitlement is amazing.
Quiet quitting is doing your job but no more. It is not about not doing your job.![]()
Anonymous wrote:You can dish it out but can't take it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you approach the boss and say look, I am not sure if you consider me a good fit for this job, maybe we should talk constructive departure with severance
Was thinking of that. But the reason I don’t like it as only one month severance at work on a performance related mutually agreed termination. However a non mutually agreed lay off I can negotiate into accelerated vesting of some of my grants and maybe a bit more vesting or medical coverage a few extra weeks.
Mutually agreed is called a voluntary leaver so no unemployment. I guess me and boss dance a bit more. Guess this is good practice for retirement.
You are essentially refusing to do your job (you admit yourself you quiet quit) and yet you think your company owes you a severance?! And a longer one than they normally provide?
You definitely deserve to be fired with no severance. The entitlement is amazing.
Anonymous wrote:When you say you were “quiet fired”—meaning not at all fired, and still full pay and benefits—that is such a slap in the face to people who have actually been fired or unemployed.
Anonymous wrote:You deserve to be fired. Doing the bare minimum and...proud of it? Start pulling your weight like the rest of us do, or quit and find something else where you aren't a drag on the company.
Anonymous wrote:well... you quiet quitted so what did you expect? You were also passive aggressive.
Anonymous wrote:Is this a communications job? Because you should definitely be fired, I have no idea what you're trying to say.
Anonymous wrote:Any advice?
It seems a micro passive aggressive odd arrangement.
Wild card I rather get laid off. But if fired for a cause type of blow up, no severance and could attempt to claw back some prior stock grants. So can’t get fired that way.
So I am doing bare minimum and my boss is doing stuff giving away work, asking me to leave zoom meetings in middle, stopped status updates. Basically in public group meetings cutting me out. Also cutting me out of info I need to do work. Trying to get me to quit
Now it is a question should I just quit. Pride wise feels better. But at same time why? Is this what all soon to be retired people look forward to. Your last job unless a pension or govt job you want to get laid off with severance and eligible unemployment. But kinda sad to go out that way. No cake or party.
[/quote
do what now??