Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP again. So this is the SJP photo I saw. I'm still unsure of what to make of it. She's 57 and looks great for 57 if you ask me -- this is not me insulting her looks. I'm just looking at the texture of her skin (it's a set photo so she's wearing camera makeup and still you can see aged texture) plus the lines around her mouth, nose, and on her forehead. Also a hint of jowels. I wonder if maybe she's has very subtle Botox/fillers as a PP suggested but nothing that would impact how she looks too much.
Honestly, this is how I'd like to age. But people say it's impossible without lots of intervention. Yet she looks her age (but good) and I don't see a hint of any of the tell tale signs of lots of work -- no lip flip, none of the weird ridges you see around the eye socket with too much Botox, no weird puffiness. At least not to my untrained eye.
Doesn't look like she's getting much done. Probably rather age naturally than look weird and puffy. She's also probably too thin. She's probably look better if she gained a few lbs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP again. So this is the SJP photo I saw. I'm still unsure of what to make of it. She's 57 and looks great for 57 if you ask me -- this is not me insulting her looks. I'm just looking at the texture of her skin (it's a set photo so she's wearing camera makeup and still you can see aged texture) plus the lines around her mouth, nose, and on her forehead. Also a hint of jowels. I wonder if maybe she's has very subtle Botox/fillers as a PP suggested but nothing that would impact how she looks too much.
Honestly, this is how I'd like to age. But people say it's impossible without lots of intervention. Yet she looks her age (but good) and I don't see a hint of any of the tell tale signs of lots of work -- no lip flip, none of the weird ridges you see around the eye socket with too much Botox, no weird puffiness. At least not to my untrained eye.
Doesn't look like she's getting much done. Probably rather age naturally than look weird and puffy. She's also probably too thin. She's probably look better if she gained a few lbs.
Anonymous wrote:OP again. So this is the SJP photo I saw. I'm still unsure of what to make of it. She's 57 and looks great for 57 if you ask me -- this is not me insulting her looks. I'm just looking at the texture of her skin (it's a set photo so she's wearing camera makeup and still you can see aged texture) plus the lines around her mouth, nose, and on her forehead. Also a hint of jowels. I wonder if maybe she's has very subtle Botox/fillers as a PP suggested but nothing that would impact how she looks too much.
Honestly, this is how I'd like to age. But people say it's impossible without lots of intervention. Yet she looks her age (but good) and I don't see a hint of any of the tell tale signs of lots of work -- no lip flip, none of the weird ridges you see around the eye socket with too much Botox, no weird puffiness. At least not to my untrained eye.

Anonymous wrote:Jamie Lee Curtis
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate to break it to the haters, but it is possible to get botox and still look relatively your own age and have wrinkles. It's not the plastic face that many people assume it is (though it can be, when severely overdone in quantity and # of areas).
You keep telling yourself that, but you look like you have done botox if you have done botox.
Anonymous wrote:I hate to break it to the haters, but it is possible to get botox and still look relatively your own age and have wrinkles. It's not the plastic face that many people assume it is (though it can be, when severely overdone in quantity and # of areas).
Anonymous wrote:I would say Gwyneth Paltrow has had minimal if any work done, that includes botox.
Currently watching Slow Horses and am in awe of how naturally beautiful Kristin Scott Thomas is. Face seems "untouched", to me.