DM absolutely publishes info about every news story before anyone else can put together an article. I check it to find out what is happening, then I actually read about stuff in other news sources. I do also enjoy all the celebrity crap too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel the same way, OP. Their political bent seems to have grown more towards the right recently. I remember when I first discovered Daily Mail, it was mainly celeb gossip with little political coverage. But now...

Going Towards? What? It's a blatant right wing hack. You didn't know that ? And yes, it is Fox News basically. I use this to actually teach bias in reporting. It's so much fun, I barely have to hunt for any of the top ten examples of bias.

Example of bias? How? Reporting on Hunter Biden's drug habits?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it's like a trip to Vegas - best to get in and out quickly. I just scan the headlines and try not to take some of it too seriously. It is interesting that they seem some days to skew right, but then they'll skew left the next. And definitely, no matter what you do, NEVER read the comments.

Pretty much this.I occasionally take a few minutes to read the comments, upvoting the progressive ones.

It ain't workin

PoLitical stuff is total garbage but celeb stories are pure gold. They also consistently cover terrible crimes. And it’s all right there, together. I don’t know where else I would find such combo.

I'm trying to break my DCUM habit first.

Maybe this will do it? They are scumbags.

Anonymous wrote:I find it's like a trip to Vegas - best to get in and out quickly. I just scan the headlines and try not to take some of it too seriously. It is interesting that they seem some days to skew right, but then they'll skew left the next. And definitely, no matter what you do, NEVER read the comments.

Pretty much this. I occasionally take a few minutes to read the comments, upvoting the progressive ones.

I find it's like a trip to Vegas - best to get in and out quickly. I just scan the headlines and try not to take some of it too seriously. It is interesting that they seem some days to skew right, but then they'll skew left the next. And definitely, no matter what you do, NEVER read the comments.

Anonymous wrote:Right there with you OP. I mostly skim the headlines and click on the celeb or random articles for entertainment.
If you want a deeper dive into celeb gossip, I encourage you to follow deuxmoi on Instagram. It's a great mix of blind items and celeb sightings. So silly and fun.

I actually prefer the deuxmoi subreddit on Reddit. It's not officially affiliated with Deuxmoi, in fact they spend a lot of time dragging Deuxmoi because a lot of stuff she publishes is highly questionable in terms of truth. But it's more than just commentary on Deuxmoi, it's also just a general celeb gossip and pop culture discussion board, like this, but more active. The demographic there tends to skew a bit younger than here and more progressive.

Right there with you OP. I mostly skim the headlines and click on the celeb or random articles for entertainment.
If you want a deeper dive into celeb gossip, I encourage you to follow deuxmoi on Instagram. It's a great mix of blind items and celeb sightings. So silly and fun.

OP here. It’s an interesting point that they are luring me in with gossip in an attempt to move me politically. It would never actually shift my voting. But I can see how their content has subtly influenced my perspective on criminal justice, trans rights, etc. by spotlighting (rare) cases where common sense leans rightward. If I were 20 instead of 40 it might have a significant effect.

I reflexively opened it this morning. This is the type of story I love. Niche Euro stuff with old tidbits I’m too young to have noticed when they were news.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-11279123/The-colourful-life-Denmarks-Queen-Margrethe-strips-grandchildren-title.html


“A Swedish newspaper was outraged when the Queen smoked during a visit to asthmatic residents of a nursing home during a royal visit.

In 2001 a study by Professor Hugo Kesteloot appeared to blame Queen Margrethe's popularity for the rate of female deaths due to smoking in Denmark.

But the royal family were immovable. Her husband Prince Henrik, an ex-smoker himself, said at the time: 'We must not be impressed or influenced by political correctness. Let people die from smoking if they want. It's their business.'

Anonymous wrote:Sorry OP, there's nothing like it. The soothing scroll of the right margin headlines, the endless cutting of figures, the best one-line sub-headlines in the biz. People is basically Highlights magazine in comparison. My deterrent is I won't download the app and the site threatens to kill any device I open it on. I guess you could try Daily mirror? The sun? They're not the same though. The upside is you'll discover that Premier League gossip is not nearly as interesting when covered by other sites so should help your detox.

Yes!!! The cutting of figures! I love it.

Anonymous wrote:I feel the same way, OP. Their political bent seems to have grown more towards the right recently. I remember when I first discovered Daily Mail, it was mainly celeb gossip with little political coverage. But now...

Going Towards? What? It's a blatant right wing hack. You didn't know that ? And yes, it is Fox News basically. I use this to actually teach bias in reporting. It's so much fun, I barely have to hunt for any of the top ten examples of bias.

Why would you break the habit? It pulls stories from.many places giving you more complete coverage. Definitely worth it.

Just read it but maybe plan to do it less often. And, make sure you don’t buy into everything you read. You’re reading to inform yourself on what some publication is putting out there, not to make it what you believe, right?