Anonymous wrote:The book notes 5 star UCLA's strongest programs as:
Computer Science, Engineering, English, Fine Arts, Mathematics, Performing Arts, Political Science, and Psychology.
UCLA seems like an interesting community.
Overall, this college guidebook loves the UC system with 4 UCs receiving the second highest academic rating (4.5 stars) and one (UCLA) receiving a full 5 star rating for academics.
Many seem to underestimate the quality of the University of Virginia. Univ. of Virginia is an outstanding university.
When I wrote the first two posts in this thread, I thought that there would be strong reaction to rating the academics of UC-Berkeley the same as for Boston University and the Univ. of Florida, and Boston College.
To really stir things up, I will list the SLACs that earned a 4.5 star academic rating (same as UC-Berkeley) :
Smith College, Wesleyan University, Bucknell University, Bates College, Univ. of Richmond, Scripps College, Colgate University, Colby College, Colorado College, College of the Holy Cross, Lafayette College, Union College, Vassar College, & Grinnell College.
Th three authors of the book all have earned doctorates--two PhDs and an EdD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
Agreed. Berkeley blows away UVA in academic departments.
The book lists Berkeley's top programs as: Biological Science, Business, Chemistry, Computer Science, Economics, Engineering, English, and Psychology.
That’s a very small sampling of Cal’s strengths. Berkeley has top programs in almost all of its offerings. Way, way more than UVA. It isn’t even close. That is only gets a 4.5 star rating from this ranking is a joke.
Probably the impacted major thing plus the high % TAs teaching undergrads vs. profs
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
Agreed. Berkeley blows away UVA in academic departments.
The book lists Berkeley's top programs as: Biological Science, Business, Chemistry, Computer Science, Economics, Engineering, English, and Psychology.
That’s a very small sampling of Cal’s strengths. Berkeley has top programs in almost all of its offerings. Way, way more than UVA. It isn’t even close. That is only gets a 4.5 star rating from this ranking is a joke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
The book lists the top academic programs at Virginia as: Biomedical Engineering, Business, Computer Science, Economics, English, Global Studies, History, and "Political Philosophy, Policy, and Law".
The academic ratings are composed of ten factors: SAT /ACT of incoming students (a weakness at Berkeley), percentage of incoming students in top 10% of their high school class, student-to-faculty ratio (another weak area for Berkeley), class size (another weak area for Berkeley), full time faculty %, Faculty with terminal degrees, mean faculty salary, freshman retention rate, six year graduation rate, and "graduation performance"--includes several factors including Pell Grant recipient graduation rates.
Which makes it kind of useless, given that many schools are test optional which skews the SAT part, only public high schools have class rank, so that skews the top 10% part, faculty salary will vary by region and cost of the college plus endowments which has nothing to do with academics, and I'm not sure how useful separating out the graduation performance of Pell grant recipients speaks to academic quality of schools versus the economic reality of the students.
We need to stop pretending that shcool are bad or not worth attending if these lists don't cherry pick them. It is counterproductive to the country as a whole and to the mental health of our young adults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
The book lists the top academic programs at Virginia as: Biomedical Engineering, Business, Computer Science, Economics, English, Global Studies, History, and "Political Philosophy, Policy, and Law".
The academic ratings are composed of ten factors: SAT /ACT of incoming students (a weakness at Berkeley), percentage of incoming students in top 10% of their high school class, student-to-faculty ratio (another weak area for Berkeley), class size (another weak area for Berkeley), full time faculty %, Faculty with terminal degrees, mean faculty salary, freshman retention rate, six year graduation rate, and "graduation performance"--includes several factors including Pell Grant recipient graduation rates.
Which makes it kind of useless, given that many schools are test optional which skews the SAT part, only public high schools have class rank, so that skews the top 10% part, faculty salary will vary by region and cost of the college plus endowments which has nothing to do with academics, and I'm not sure how useful separating out the graduation performance of Pell grant recipients speaks to academic quality of schools versus the economic reality of the students.
We need to stop pretending that shcool are bad or not worth attending if these lists don't cherry pick them. It is counterproductive to the country as a whole and to the mental health of our young adults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
The book lists the top academic programs at Virginia as: Biomedical Engineering, Business, Computer Science, Economics, English, Global Studies, History, and "Political Philosophy, Policy, and Law".
The academic ratings are composed of ten factors: SAT /ACT of incoming students (a weakness at Berkeley), percentage of incoming students in top 10% of their high school class, student-to-faculty ratio (another weak area for Berkeley), class size (another weak area for Berkeley), full time faculty %, Faculty with terminal degrees, mean faculty salary, freshman retention rate, six year graduation rate, and "graduation performance"--includes several factors including Pell Grant recipient graduation rates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
Agreed. Berkeley blows away UVA in academic departments.
The book lists Berkeley's top programs as: Biological Science, Business, Chemistry, Computer Science, Economics, Engineering, English, and Psychology.
That’s a very small sampling of Cal’s strengths. Berkeley has top programs in almost all of its offerings. Way, way more than UVA. It isn’t even close. That is only gets a 4.5 star rating from this ranking is a joke.
Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
Anonymous wrote:STEM isn’t everything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
Rankings are BS. No doubt about that. But why do DCUM people say UVA is weak in STEM? I’m not saying it is strong, I just don’t know. The same way I dint know about 99% of colleges.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
Rankings are BS. No doubt about that. But why do DCUM people say UVA is weak in STEM? I’m not saying it is strong, I just don’t know. The same way I dint know about 99% of colleges.
Because compared to other top publics and privates, UVA is weak in STEM overall.
This doesn’t answer the question, it just restated what was already said. Weak in what way?