Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The colleges listed are at the top because they get first pick of high school students who are most likely to be successful, not because of anything the colleges did differently than colleges that are a bit less selective.

it's the schools you don't expect which are the interesting ones here. Claremont McKenna does incredibly well for a school that isn't that well-known by most people. It suggests their career services might be doing something to help grads stand out for elite jobs and graduate schools.

Claremont McKenna is not unexpected to those who know about colleges.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Lacrosse rankings (except engineering), lol.

Yes. And as the previous poster commented about the revulsion of choosing based on who sends the most to McKinsey or wall street.....yuck.

I never seen anyone saying anything about choosing based on sending NASA or even Google
What's wrong with McKinsey or Wall streetf??

Lax bros.

Even lax bros gotta have jobs after college.

PS sorry your kid didn't make the club team.

Lol. There it is folks. Have a fun working with that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Lacrosse rankings (except engineering), lol.

Yes. And as the previous poster commented about the revulsion of choosing based on who sends the most to McKinsey or wall street.....yuck.

I never seen anyone saying anything about choosing based on sending NASA or even Google
What's wrong with McKinsey or Wall streetf??

Lax bros.

Even lax bros gotta have jobs after college.

PS sorry your kid didn't make the club team.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The colleges listed are at the top because they get first pick of high school students who are most likely to be successful, not because of anything the colleges did differently than colleges that are a bit less selective.

it's the schools you don't expect which are the interesting ones here. Claremont McKenna does incredibly well for a school that isn't that well-known by most people. It suggests their career services might be doing something to help grads stand out for elite jobs and graduate schools.

For $82k total COA they'd better be doing something outstanding.

I noticed the list for the medical school feeders took as destinations the top 25 research medical schools. Seems they should’ve included the top
primary care med schools too, or at least have some kind of mix.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Lacrosse rankings (except engineering), lol.

Yes. And as the previous poster commented about the revulsion of choosing based on who sends the most to McKinsey or wall street.....yuck.

I never seen anyone saying anything about choosing based on sending NASA or even Google
What's wrong with McKinsey or Wall streetf??

McKinsey and opioids, McKinsey and South Africa, McKinsey and Enron etc...

Anonymous wrote:The colleges listed are at the top because they get first pick of high school students who are most likely to be connected, not because of anything the colleges did differently than colleges that are a bit less selective.

FTFY

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Lacrosse rankings (except engineering), lol.

Yes. And as the previous poster commented about the revulsion of choosing based on who sends the most to McKinsey or wall street.....yuck.

I never seen anyone saying anything about choosing based on sending NASA or even Google
What's wrong with McKinsey or Wall streetf??

Lax bros.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Lacrosse rankings (except engineering), lol.

Yes. And as the previous poster commented about the revulsion of choosing based on who sends the most to McKinsey or wall street.....yuck.

I never seen anyone saying anything about choosing based on sending NASA or even Google
What's wrong with McKinsey or Wall streetf??

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Lacrosse rankings (except engineering), lol.

Yes. And as the previous poster commented about the revulsion of choosing based on who sends the most to McKinsey or wall street.....yuck.

Looks like Lacrosse rankings (except engineering), lol.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m so tired of ranking threads.

This isn’t how you pick schools.

+1
I guess it is for some of these status-obsessed people.

This isn't a ranking, it's using factual data to show where top companies and grad programs get their people from. All numbers, no methodology

Anonymous wrote:I’m so tired of ranking threads.

This isn’t how you pick schools.

+1
I guess it is for some of these status-obsessed people.

"I’m so tired of ranking threads.

This isn’t how you pick schools."

This isn't a ranking thread. It's merely a list of which schools send the most kids to grad programs and certain types of employers, on a per capita basis.

I find it interesting that some small schools are able to prepare and send students to these programs/jobs. In other words, they hold their own against the schools many ambitious kids are clamoring to attend.

Anonymous wrote:The colleges listed are at the top because they get first pick of high school students who are most likely to be successful, not because of anything the colleges did differently than colleges that are a bit less selective.

it's the schools you don't expect which are the interesting ones here. Claremont McKenna does incredibly well for a school that isn't that well-known by most people. It suggests their career services might be doing something to help grads stand out for elite jobs and graduate schools.