Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. We went through IVF at Columbia Fertility. 6 eggs retrieved, two transferred at early morula and 8 cell stage, three more discarded. Was not informed about remaining embryos being discarded. Not pregnant. This has been an awful experience, and we are where we started - no pregnancy, no eggs.
For those that had to do multiple rounds and had "late developing embryos", was assisted hatching successful? Dreading doing this again, especially after the disregard shown by Columbia Fertility.
So I don't think ANY of these clinics are honest about the numbers game with embryos. I'm at Walter Reed so they have no reason not to be frank and just aren't. Shady Grove was the same. I had 28 follicles, 13 mature eggs, 11 fertilized and only 3 made it to day 5 and after PGT I'll be lucky to have 1 normal embryo. After reading odds that's very typical outcome. Except most people don't start with that many eggs. So in other words 1 cycle is unlikely to result in a baby š.
Agree that RE world isn't very transparent about the odds of one cycle working. I am more upset about the fact that the only thing I got from Columbia Fertility about the three that weren't implanted was an email that literally says "Day 6: 3@degenerate and discarded." This is the only update I have received from a medical professional. I only know about what stages they were at due to forcing a coordinator to go through my charts the day of my pregnancy test in the office because I refused to take the test until this was explained, along with breakthrough bleeding that had begun and was report via email and phone, not on my chart. As far as mature eggs, they told me they couldn't tell which ones were mature????? They also did not do a follicle count throughout the process, just measured three biggest follicles at each stage. I don't even know how many follicles I had. Do not go to Columbia Fertility.
I am looking for insight from people who have had "late progressing embryos" and ICIS, not assisted hatching as I said earlier. If you had late progressing embryos in one cycle, did ICIS help? Going back to Dominion for next cycle but curious what other's experience has been.
Its very common to lose most embryos by day 5 in development. Hence I went from 11 to 3. There is a visual difference in mature vs immature egg, but that would also be caught in the fertilization rate.
Since we had to do ICSI for PGT they said we wouldn't need assisted hatching or other interventions before transferring.
Was yours a fresh transfer? There is more and more evidence that transfer from frozen is better than fresh transfers, but if they transferred early because of quality concerns it may have been likely that the embryos wouldn't make it to freeze (like the other 3 did not).
It was a fresh transfer, but I am really looking for anyone's experience dealing with developing embryos and ICSI as ICSI was not something we did in this round.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. We went through IVF at Columbia Fertility. 6 eggs retrieved, two transferred at early morula and 8 cell stage, three more discarded. Was not informed about remaining embryos being discarded. Not pregnant. This has been an awful experience, and we are where we started - no pregnancy, no eggs.
For those that had to do multiple rounds and had "late developing embryos", was assisted hatching successful? Dreading doing this again, especially after the disregard shown by Columbia Fertility.
So I don't think ANY of these clinics are honest about the numbers game with embryos. I'm at Walter Reed so they have no reason not to be frank and just aren't. Shady Grove was the same. I had 28 follicles, 13 mature eggs, 11 fertilized and only 3 made it to day 5 and after PGT I'll be lucky to have 1 normal embryo. After reading odds that's very typical outcome. Except most people don't start with that many eggs. So in other words 1 cycle is unlikely to result in a baby š.
Agree that RE world isn't very transparent about the odds of one cycle working. I am more upset about the fact that the only thing I got from Columbia Fertility about the three that weren't implanted was an email that literally says "Day 6: 3@degenerate and discarded." This is the only update I have received from a medical professional. I only know about what stages they were at due to forcing a coordinator to go through my charts the day of my pregnancy test in the office because I refused to take the test until this was explained, along with breakthrough bleeding that had begun and was report via email and phone, not on my chart. As far as mature eggs, they told me they couldn't tell which ones were mature????? They also did not do a follicle count throughout the process, just measured three biggest follicles at each stage. I don't even know how many follicles I had. Do not go to Columbia Fertility.
I am looking for insight from people who have had "late progressing embryos" and ICIS, not assisted hatching as I said earlier. If you had late progressing embryos in one cycle, did ICIS help? Going back to Dominion for next cycle but curious what other's experience has been.
Its very common to lose most embryos by day 5 in development. Hence I went from 11 to 3. There is a visual difference in mature vs immature egg, but that would also be caught in the fertilization rate.
Since we had to do ICSI for PGT they said we wouldn't need assisted hatching or other interventions before transferring.
Was yours a fresh transfer? There is more and more evidence that transfer from frozen is better than fresh transfers, but if they transferred early because of quality concerns it may have been likely that the embryos wouldn't make it to freeze (like the other 3 did not).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. We went through IVF at Columbia Fertility. 6 eggs retrieved, two transferred at early morula and 8 cell stage, three more discarded. Was not informed about remaining embryos being discarded. Not pregnant. This has been an awful experience, and we are where we started - no pregnancy, no eggs.
For those that had to do multiple rounds and had "late developing embryos", was assisted hatching successful? Dreading doing this again, especially after the disregard shown by Columbia Fertility.
So I don't think ANY of these clinics are honest about the numbers game with embryos. I'm at Walter Reed so they have no reason not to be frank and just aren't. Shady Grove was the same. I had 28 follicles, 13 mature eggs, 11 fertilized and only 3 made it to day 5 and after PGT I'll be lucky to have 1 normal embryo. After reading odds that's very typical outcome. Except most people don't start with that many eggs. So in other words 1 cycle is unlikely to result in a baby š.
Agree that RE world isn't very transparent about the odds of one cycle working. I am more upset about the fact that the only thing I got from Columbia Fertility about the three that weren't implanted was an email that literally says "Day 6: 3@degenerate and discarded." This is the only update I have received from a medical professional. I only know about what stages they were at due to forcing a coordinator to go through my charts the day of my pregnancy test in the office because I refused to take the test until this was explained, along with breakthrough bleeding that had begun and was report via email and phone, not on my chart. As far as mature eggs, they told me they couldn't tell which ones were mature????? They also did not do a follicle count throughout the process, just measured three biggest follicles at each stage. I don't even know how many follicles I had. Do not go to Columbia Fertility.
I am looking for insight from people who have had "late progressing embryos" and ICIS, not assisted hatching as I said earlier. If you had late progressing embryos in one cycle, did ICIS help? Going back to Dominion for next cycle but curious what other's experience has been.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. We went through IVF at Columbia Fertility. 6 eggs retrieved, two transferred at early morula and 8 cell stage, three more discarded. Was not informed about remaining embryos being discarded. Not pregnant. This has been an awful experience, and we are where we started - no pregnancy, no eggs.
For those that had to do multiple rounds and had "late developing embryos", was assisted hatching successful? Dreading doing this again, especially after the disregard shown by Columbia Fertility.
So I don't think ANY of these clinics are honest about the numbers game with embryos. I'm at Walter Reed so they have no reason not to be frank and just aren't. Shady Grove was the same. I had 28 follicles, 13 mature eggs, 11 fertilized and only 3 made it to day 5 and after PGT I'll be lucky to have 1 normal embryo. After reading odds that's very typical outcome. Except most people don't start with that many eggs. So in other words 1 cycle is unlikely to result in a baby š.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. We went through IVF at Columbia Fertility. 6 eggs retrieved, two transferred at early morula and 8 cell stage, three more discarded. Was not informed about remaining embryos being discarded. Not pregnant. This has been an awful experience, and we are where we started - no pregnancy, no eggs.
For those that had to do multiple rounds and had "late developing embryos", was assisted hatching successful? Dreading doing this again, especially after the disregard shown by Columbia Fertility.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. We went through IVF at Columbia Fertility. 6 eggs retrieved, two transferred at early morula and 8 cell stage, three more discarded. Was not informed about remaining embryos being discarded. Not pregnant. This has been an awful experience, and we are where we started - no pregnancy, no eggs.
For those that had to do multiple rounds and had "late developing embryos", was assisted hatching successful? Dreading doing this again, especially after the disregard shown by Columbia Fertility.
Anonymous wrote:We had unexplained IF too and had to go through IVF to conceive our first at age 39, but then we went on and had our second naturally at 42.
One crucial first step was finding an RE that we trusted. I started with one that just didn't seem a good fit. I had no problem transferring to another RE in the same practice who's younger and much more up to date on the latest research, and he had the best bedside manner to boot. I completely trusted him. He basically laid it out as: given our ages, our best bet was IVF. But knowing that we were reluctant to go straight to IVF, he thinks the wisest course for us was to go through a couple of medicated rounds and IUIs, but not to wait too long before IVF if none of those worked.
So we proceeded with 3 medicated rounds and 1 IUI. I do not regret these rounds because they provided data points to my RE about my responses to various meds and doses, and he adjusted them each month. So going into ivf he knew what meds/dosage worked best for me. Also they helped prepare us mentally and physically for the ivf. I got used to the needles, and we had plenty of practice with everything.
Because of this stepped up approach, the idea of ivf wasn't so scary any more and we lost no time getting into that cycle. The RE correctly predicted how many eggs I would produce, and we got DC1 from that one cycle.
Anonymous wrote:After many failed timed sex attempts, its looking like we will need to go into IVF, something I really am dreading. Can anymore who has been there, done that give me a head's up on how different medication will be, side effects? Also, any insight into what kind of prep is needed? I feel like we should be able to start with one cycle between our last timed sex and starting an IFV cycle. We are entering what is likely our last timed sex cycle.
Also, are people in the DMV still able to do fresh transfers? Or should I really just be preparing to go through a harvest cycle.