Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you look around before pulling out?
This, 100%
I’m guessing not. That’s why she ran into the door and/or the ankle of the victim. Probably on the phone at the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone rear-ended 21-year-old DS and then sued him. Our insurance company told DS it was a total scam and a joke lawsuit. But they ended up settling because it’s cheaper than going to court. It was really stressful for DS, who was also treated to discovery documents on this woman’s health issues including various vaginal infections. But, DS (and us by extension) never paid a penny, which is guess is a sort-of good ending, although I hate the fact the scammer got money for this.
That is insane. Will the person who hit your son have any negative impact to their insurance?
Anonymous wrote:It will be fine. Doubt it will go to trial. The insurances will duke it out and it will be settled.
I got sued for $700,000 in damages from a car accident and they settled within my policy limits.
Anonymous wrote:Someone rear-ended 21-year-old DS and then sued him. Our insurance company told DS it was a total scam and a joke lawsuit. But they ended up settling because it’s cheaper than going to court. It was really stressful for DS, who was also treated to discovery documents on this woman’s health issues including various vaginal infections. But, DS (and us by extension) never paid a penny, which is guess is a sort-of good ending, although I hate the fact the scammer got money for this.
Anonymous wrote:Someone rear-ended 21-year-old DS and then sued him. Our insurance company told DS it was a total scam and a joke lawsuit. But they ended up settling because it’s cheaper than going to court. It was really stressful for DS, who was also treated to discovery documents on this woman’s health issues including various vaginal infections. But, DS (and us by extension) never paid a penny, which is guess is a sort-of good ending, although I hate the fact the scammer got money for this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Weird. They’re only “entitled” to damages. Which are presumably covered by their insurance company. Are they claiming bodily injury? Emotional distress? Lost wages? I’m so curious what their legal claims are.
They are claiming bodily injury to their ankle
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you look around before pulling out?
This, 100%
I’m guessing not. That’s why she ran into the door and/or the ankle of the victim. Probably on the phone at the time.
Anonymous wrote:Did you look around before pulling out?
Anonymous wrote:Weird. They’re only “entitled” to damages. Which are presumably covered by their insurance company. Are they claiming bodily injury? Emotional distress? Lost wages? I’m so curious what their legal claims are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you look around before pulling out?
How would that have helped avoid this situation? It's not like there's any external sign that someone in a neighboring car is preparing to open a door...
Sorry you are dealing with this, OP.