Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know 2 couples like this.
One- the man finally proposed and married her at 43 after dating for 10 yrs. Too late for kids by that point, though there was some talk about adoption. Unfortunately she ended up dying just a couple years later of an aggressive uterine cancer that I speculate maybe could have been avoided had she had kids.
Two- the woman is super progressive and has no interest in marriage or kids.
Uh, what? This sounds like a looney tunes conclusion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know 2 couples like this.
One- the man finally proposed and married her at 43 after dating for 10 yrs. Too late for kids by that point, though there was some talk about adoption. Unfortunately she ended up dying just a couple years later of an aggressive uterine cancer that I speculate maybe could have been avoided had she had kids.
Two- the woman is super progressive and has no interest in marriage or kids.
Uh, what? This sounds like a looney tunes conclusion.
Right? Wtf?! Having kids does not prevent cancer.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve heard it all. OP blames a woman’s cancer on a man for not knocking her up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know 2 couples like this.
One- the man finally proposed and married her at 43 after dating for 10 yrs. Too late for kids by that point, though there was some talk about adoption. Unfortunately she ended up dying just a couple years later of an aggressive uterine cancer that I speculate maybe could have been avoided had she had kids.
Two- the woman is super progressive and has no interest in marriage or kids.
Uh, what? This sounds like a looney tunes conclusion.
Right? Wtf?! Having kids does not prevent cancer.
Actually, there is evidence that childbearing (and breastfeeding) lowers your risk for certain cancers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know 2 couples like this.
One- the man finally proposed and married her at 43 after dating for 10 yrs. Too late for kids by that point, though there was some talk about adoption. Unfortunately she ended up dying just a couple years later of an aggressive uterine cancer that I speculate maybe could have been avoided had she had kids.
Two- the woman is super progressive and has no interest in marriage or kids.
Uh, what? This sounds like a looney tunes conclusion.
Right? Wtf?! Having kids does not prevent cancer.
Actually, there is evidence that childbearing (and breastfeeding) lowers your risk for certain cancers.
Not endometrial. You'd have to have over 10 children and breastfeed them all for 1+ years to lower the risk for this cancer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know 2 couples like this.
One- the man finally proposed and married her at 43 after dating for 10 yrs. Too late for kids by that point, though there was some talk about adoption. Unfortunately she ended up dying just a couple years later of an aggressive uterine cancer that I speculate maybe could have been avoided had she had kids.
Two- the woman is super progressive and has no interest in marriage or kids.
Uh, what? This sounds like a looney tunes conclusion.
Right? Wtf?! Having kids does not prevent cancer.
Actually, there is evidence that childbearing (and breastfeeding) lowers your risk for certain cancers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know 2 couples like this.
One- the man finally proposed and married her at 43 after dating for 10 yrs. Too late for kids by that point, though there was some talk about adoption. Unfortunately she ended up dying just a couple years later of an aggressive uterine cancer that I speculate maybe could have been avoided had she had kids.
Two- the woman is super progressive and has no interest in marriage or kids.
Uh, what? This sounds like a looney tunes conclusion.
Right? Wtf?! Having kids does not prevent cancer.
Actually, there is evidence that childbearing (and breastfeeding) lowers your risk for certain cancers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know 2 couples like this.
One- the man finally proposed and married her at 43 after dating for 10 yrs. Too late for kids by that point, though there was some talk about adoption. Unfortunately she ended up dying just a couple years later of an aggressive uterine cancer that I speculate maybe could have been avoided had she had kids.
Two- the woman is super progressive and has no interest in marriage or kids.
Uh, what? This sounds like a looney tunes conclusion.
Right? Wtf?! Having kids does not prevent cancer.
Anonymous wrote:OP you seem to be making a lot of assumptions which may or may not be true. My DH and I are in our late 40's with no kids. We were together a long time before we got married which I know raised a lot of eyebrows. Honestly, marriage was not important to me-in fact, I was very hesitant to marry for various reasons. Before we married people who did not know us well often incorrectly assumed that I really wanted to get married and DH didn't because that's the common narrative.
It's weird how other people's choices about marriage and kids bother some people. There were family members of ours who seemed oddly relieved when we married. And we've definitely gotten they side eye from some people for not having kids. I'm hoping that for younger generations this isn't the case. But as a Gen X-er, it definitely has been for me.
Anonymous wrote:How do you know the woman wants to get married and have kids? I kind of doubt it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How do you know the woman wants to get married and have kids? I kind of doubt it.
+1. OP sounds like a judgy old fool. And what’s with her last sentence? Women are not trash to be “disposed” of.