Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't you want to consider a place where there's reasonablely good medical care in anticipation of aging? Costa Rica and Georgia are the 2 last places that come to mind
Costa Rica has amazing health care. People go there for medical tourism.
$500,000 is probably not enough for even a very frugal American to retire in costa rica. Though I guess a lot depends on how long you think you'll live.
Anonymous wrote:I stayed in a town in Mexico that was popular with American retirees for about a month learning Spanish. I made friends with a few. They were very cheap when it came to getting lunch and things like that. So my perception is that they don’t even have a middle class lifestyle in this low cost country. For me it would not be worth it
Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't you want to consider a place where there's reasonablely good medical care in anticipation of aging? Costa Rica and Georgia are the 2 last places that come to mind
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't you want to consider a place where there's reasonablely good medical care in anticipation of aging? Costa Rica and Georgia are the 2 last places that come to mind
Costa Rica has amazing health care. People go there for medical tourism.
Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't you want to consider a place where there's reasonablely good medical care in anticipation of aging? Costa Rica and Georgia are the 2 last places that come to mind
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Check out the leanfire and expatfire subs on reddit. $500k would be extremely lean, but if you let it compound for a few more years, it's possible.
Possible, maybe. A good idea? Probably not. Living one unexpected expense away from bankruptcy hardly seems like a recipe for a rewarding and comfortable retirement.
Spend less, save more.
What if I’d rather live large in a third world country than live frugally in America?
It depends on how you define "living large". 3rd World countries implicate a host of potential issues from economic and political instability and undemocratic governments, to poor quality/limited availability health care, lower life expectancies, limited public services, poor infrastructure, public corruption, pollution, and crime. Obviously, not all of these issues are present in every 3rd World country, but they define the term. You may be relatively wealthy in such environments while still experiencing a relatively poor overall quality of life compared to retirement in a 1st World country.
It depends on what you value. If you prioritize cheap food and housing and household help over all else, go for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Check out the leanfire and expatfire subs on reddit. $500k would be extremely lean, but if you let it compound for a few more years, it's possible.
Possible, maybe. A good idea? Probably not. Living one unexpected expense away from bankruptcy hardly seems like a recipe for a rewarding and comfortable retirement.
Spend less, save more.
What if I’d rather live large in a third world country than live frugally in America?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Check out the leanfire and expatfire subs on reddit. $500k would be extremely lean, but if you let it compound for a few more years, it's possible.
Possible, maybe. A good idea? Probably not. Living one unexpected expense away from bankruptcy hardly seems like a recipe for a rewarding and comfortable retirement.
Spend less, save more.
What if I’d rather live large in a third world country than live frugally in America?
The Baltics are not third world. Living on countryside is extremely cheap.