On a scale of 1-11, how close do you think we are to living in that no dancing town from Footloose?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genderqueer has a Greek style drawing of a naked adult man touching the penis of a child

Prove it

Go buy the book from a bookstore and see. But don't post the pic here, it's NSFW.

Better keep your kids out of museums with Ancient Greek art and pottery since that's where the drawing came from.

When are you freaks going to try to close down the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford, England for displaying such smut? It's only been there since 1683.

https://collections.ashmolean.org/collection/search/per_page/25/offset/0/sort_by/relevance/object/24343

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genderqueer has a Greek style drawing of a naked adult man touching the penis of a child

Prove it

Go buy the book from a bookstore and see. But don't post the pic here, it's NSFW.

Anonymous wrote:Good! Ban those books!!!


This is what the other side of banning guns looks like.

When was the last time that you heard of a classroom full of kids being killed by a book, obscene or otherwise?

Anonymous wrote:Genderqueer has a Greek style drawing of a naked adult man touching the penis of a child

Prove it

The judge threw out the obscenity case today. Notwithstanding the earlier order finding probable cause to believe the books in question could be considered obscene, the court found the obscenity law at issue facially invalid.

https://www.virginiamercury.com/2022/08/30/judge-throws-out-obscenity-case-attempting-to-restrict-sales-of-books-in-virginia-beach/

Anonymous wrote:Genderqueer has a Greek style drawing of a naked adult man touching the penis of a child

Liar who hasn’t read the book.

GTFO.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good! Ban those books!!!


This is what the other side of banning guns looks like.

Please show me on the doll where the book blew your limbs off.

If you allow your kids to have smart phones, they are looking at a whole lot worse than any book would let them see.

This. It seems that many are unaware of what is available on the internet.

Republicans love them some unborn babies until they come out queer af.

Anonymous wrote:Good! Ban those books!!!


This is what the other side of banning guns looks like.

Please show me on the doll where the book blew your limbs off.

If you allow your kids to have smart phones, they are looking at a whole lot worse than any book would let them see.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t “gender queer” child porn? Why not have the Justice dept. charge bookstores and libraries for having possession of child porn with intent to distribute.

Because that’s not what it is at all.

The GOP is hurtling toward fascism and they seem damn proud of it.

how would you describe an image of an adult naked man with an erection touching a child’s penis ? Because that’s in the book genderqueer

No, it's not. Have you read the book? I think you may be confusing things.

Anonymous wrote:Good! Ban those books!!!


This is what the other side of banning guns looks like.

North Korea may be more to your liking, hon.

Anonymous wrote:Good! Ban those books!!!


This is what the other side of banning guns looks like.

Purse, this is not the other side of that. They're vastly different things. Plus no one is trying to ban guns, which makes it not the same thing.

Go live in some oppressive regime if this is the kind of world you want

Good! Ban those books!!!


This is what the other side of banning guns looks like.

Anonymous wrote:I thought these two books (actually I didn't know about the Maas book, I thought it was a different one) had already been found to be obscene and therefore were removed from bookstores.

We don’t do that in America.