Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I lived in the city, my dog had it made. I lived in an apartment so we HAD to go to the park 3x per day. She had a blast with all the other dogs and I loved chatting with the dog owners. It's better than people who just let their dogs out in the backyard to poop.
I had a coworker who claimed that he never took his dog out for a walk. The dog just got let out to poop in the yard. From what I saw, the dog seemed happy enough.
Anonymous wrote:You know what is also impractical? Children. Yet they're still popular.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Other people can afford dog walkers, sitters and boarding and you can’t, OP.
OP here. I can afford it, but it seems like a lot of money to spend in order to NOT spend time with your dog. It's different to me than people who have kids and then put them in daycare and send them to school -- most people do not have kids "for companionship". They do it because they want to raise kids, and part of that is getting them good care and an education.
But the main reason people get pets is for companionship. It seems odd to me to get a very high maintenance pet when you are going to be away from them for long periods of time often. I'm sure the dogs to fine with the dog walkers and sitters (and may even enjoy them), but it seems like an odd choice from the perspective of the human.
It seems like all the burden of having a pet with more minimal enjoyment because you are working/out/traveling so much. The main reason I don't have a dog is that I would not want to ever have to choose between my dog and going out to dinner or taking a last minute weekend trip, but I know people with dogs often have to do this because they will say to me "oh I'd love to do that but I have to worry about the dog."
Anonymous wrote:I love dogs, this is not an anti-dog post.
I live in DC in a condo with a small balcony. I'm in the H Street Corridor, which is pretty dense. There are parks, including some designated dog parks, but the nearest one is about 5 blocks away. So owning a dog in my building means taking your dog on walks 2-3x a day, often to places that are 30 minute round trip (or hiring someone to do so).
Most of the people in my building are professionals in their 20s and 30s and, like me, work 50+ hour weeks and travel fairly often (both for work and pleasure).
About half of the people in the building have dogs.
How? Why? It seems like the most impractical thing. Having to structure your day around walking your dog, even with WFH, just seems incredibly burdensome -- my job is demanding and all I can imagine is my dog needing to pee while I'm on a conference call that is running long. Plus paying for dog walkers and sitters every time I'm in the office or traveling. Having to structure evening plans around walking my dog. And never being able to just open the door and let him into the yard -- always having to leash him and walk him a half mile just to let him run around.
It's baffling to me. Like I said, I love dogs and would love to get one, but my life just seems not at all conducive to it. A cat seems feasible, though I understand many people don't like cats. But still, if you want companionship in an apartment and you work/travel a lot, a cat seems like an obvious choice. And yet I only know one cat owner in my building and like 30 dog owners.
Why is this so popular?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hear you OP. I live in a condo and most of my neighbors have dogs, and not just dogs, but big dogs! Labs, labradoodles, sheepdogs (or maybe sheepadoodles?), golden retrievers, and at least one pitbull. I don't know why they get such big dogs in small condos, especially the owners who travel a lot for work.
The big, energetic dogs in small apartment thing seems cruel to me. Some dogs are low energy and don't need a lot of space and make good apartment dogs. But yes, I see people with labs and retriever's in apartments all the time. And they are young dogs. It's just not a good fit.
Anonymous wrote:When I lived in the city, my dog had it made. I lived in an apartment so we HAD to go to the park 3x per day. She had a blast with all the other dogs and I loved chatting with the dog owners. It's better than people who just let their dogs out in the backyard to poop.
Anonymous wrote:You know what is also impractical? Children. Yet they're still popular.
Anonymous wrote:I live in a single family house in the suburbs and have a daily dog walker and board our dog when we travel. We have a big fenced yard but he doesn’t like to hang out back there by himself. What you’ve described isn’t that different from the life my suburban dog lives.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Other people can afford dog walkers, sitters and boarding and you can’t, OP.
OP here. I can afford it, but it seems like a lot of money to spend in order to NOT spend time with your dog. It's different to me than people who have kids and then put them in daycare and send them to school -- most people do not have kids "for companionship". They do it because they want to raise kids, and part of that is getting them good care and an education.
But the main reason people get pets is for companionship. It seems odd to me to get a very high maintenance pet when you are going to be away from them for long periods of time often. I'm sure the dogs to fine with the dog walkers and sitters (and may even enjoy them), but it seems like an odd choice from the perspective of the human.
It seems like all the burden of having a pet with more minimal enjoyment because you are working/out/traveling so much. The main reason I don't have a dog is that I would not want to ever have to choose between my dog and going out to dinner or taking a last minute weekend trip, but I know people with dogs often have to do this because they will say to me "oh I'd love to do that but I have to worry about the dog."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Other people can afford dog walkers, sitters and boarding and you can’t, OP.
OP here. I can afford it, but it seems like a lot of money to spend in order to NOT spend time with your dog. It's different to me than people who have kids and then put them in daycare and send them to school -- most people do not have kids "for companionship". They do it because they want to raise kids, and part of that is getting them good care and an education.
But the main reason people get pets is for companionship. It seems odd to me to get a very high maintenance pet when you are going to be away from them for long periods of time often. I'm sure the dogs to fine with the dog walkers and sitters (and may even enjoy them), but it seems like an odd choice from the perspective of the human.
It seems like all the burden of having a pet with more minimal enjoyment because you are working/out/traveling so much. The main reason I don't have a dog is that I would not want to ever have to choose between my dog and going out to dinner or taking a last minute weekend trip, but I know people with dogs often have to do this because they will say to me "oh I'd love to do that but I have to worry about the dog."