Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They're valid to the person who has to choose between eating and living indoors. Or choose between seeing a doctor when they're sick and paying rent. Or choose new shoes when the old ones are worn out and paying the electric bill. Or a hundred other things rich people are fortunate enough not to have to worry about. You don't get to decide what's valid until you start protesting against lack of affordable healthcare and out of control rents and inflation.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe your Nanny is receiving subsidized housing or Medicaid and is afraid that if she reports her Nanny wages - then she will be homeless or w/o healthcare which are valid reasons to be afraid.
In order to make sure she can afford a home along w/healthcare you should pay her vacation time for sure.
Also a health insurance stipend so she can get off Medicaid and see a good doctor.
Those aren't "valid" reasons for breaking the law. They are valid reasons to make sure you're offering an attractive enough wage to attract a law abiding nanny.
In that case, why shouldn't the nanny steal from grocery stores. They need to eat. Or borrow someone's car without permission, because they need to get somewhere and don't have a car. Paying taxes above a certain income level is the law. You don't get to decide that the working poor (who often get a lot back in the form of income tax credits) get to evade taxes. Employers who do this are screwing said nanny over because they won't be eligible for unemployment, earn social security credits, or disability pay if they get hurt while working. Not to mention they get to avoid paying employer taxes, which are substantial, which is why some people who pay under the table (aka not paying the taxes required by law) twist themselves into a pretzel trying to make excuses for why they are breaking the law.
Anonymous wrote:They're valid to the person who has to choose between eating and living indoors. Or choose between seeing a doctor when they're sick and paying rent. Or choose new shoes when the old ones are worn out and paying the electric bill. Or a hundred other things rich people are fortunate enough not to have to worry about. You don't get to decide what's valid until you start protesting against lack of affordable healthcare and out of control rents and inflation.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe your Nanny is receiving subsidized housing or Medicaid and is afraid that if she reports her Nanny wages - then she will be homeless or w/o healthcare which are valid reasons to be afraid.
In order to make sure she can afford a home along w/healthcare you should pay her vacation time for sure.
Also a health insurance stipend so she can get off Medicaid and see a good doctor.
Those aren't "valid" reasons for breaking the law. They are valid reasons to make sure you're offering an attractive enough wage to attract a law abiding nanny.
Anonymous wrote:They're valid to the person who has to choose between eating and living indoors. Or choose between seeing a doctor when they're sick and paying rent. Or choose new shoes when the old ones are worn out and paying the electric bill. Or a hundred other things rich people are fortunate enough not to have to worry about. You don't get to decide what's valid until you start protesting against lack of affordable healthcare and out of control rents and inflation.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe your Nanny is receiving subsidized housing or Medicaid and is afraid that if she reports her Nanny wages - then she will be homeless or w/o healthcare which are valid reasons to be afraid.
In order to make sure she can afford a home along w/healthcare you should pay her vacation time for sure.
Also a health insurance stipend so she can get off Medicaid and see a good doctor.
Those aren't "valid" reasons for breaking the law. They are valid reasons to make sure you're offering an attractive enough wage to attract a law abiding nanny.
They're valid to the person who has to choose between eating and living indoors. Or choose between seeing a doctor when they're sick and paying rent. Or choose new shoes when the old ones are worn out and paying the electric bill. Or a hundred other things rich people are fortunate enough not to have to worry about. You don't get to decide what's valid until you start protesting against lack of affordable healthcare and out of control rents and inflation.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe your Nanny is receiving subsidized housing or Medicaid and is afraid that if she reports her Nanny wages - then she will be homeless or w/o healthcare which are valid reasons to be afraid.
In order to make sure she can afford a home along w/healthcare you should pay her vacation time for sure.
Also a health insurance stipend so she can get off Medicaid and see a good doctor.
Those aren't "valid" reasons for breaking the law. They are valid reasons to make sure you're offering an attractive enough wage to attract a law abiding nanny.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe your Nanny is receiving subsidized housing or Medicaid and is afraid that if she reports her Nanny wages - then she will be homeless or w/o healthcare which are valid reasons to be afraid.
In order to make sure she can afford a home along w/healthcare you should pay her vacation time for sure.
Also a health insurance stipend so she can get off Medicaid and see a good doctor.
It's normal outside DC.Anonymous wrote:Gotta love that it took anonymous DCUM posters for OP to “reconsider” doing something illegal.
Anonymous wrote:Gotta love that it took anonymous DCUM posters for OP to “reconsider” doing something illegal.
Anonymous wrote:OP: Thanks everyone! This all makes total sense to me. I think the confusion about salaried vs. hourly came from what felt like this being a more informal arrangement, stemming from her preference to be off the books. But these comments have me reconsidering that as well - honestly it seemed like such a common request during our nanny search we assumed that was the norm. But if she isn't willing to go above board maybe we shouldn't move forward after all.
Anonymous wrote:You have to guarantee her hours whether you use her or not - so yes, when you go on vacation on her regular days you have to pay her. Giving her a vacation and PTO is standard as well.
Anonymous wrote:Do not do no do not pay off the books. This is illegal, wrong and can go sideways so many ways. If you can't afford a nanny on the books you need other arrangements.