Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats gleefully pointing to Hogan’s veto to cover up for their incompetently run administrative state.
Exactly. Hogan really screwed things up by not letting dems start counting mail in ballots before the election, so they’d know how many votes they needed to come up with on the final count to ensure the preferred candidates all won their primaries.
Damn that Larry Hogan!
He could have let them start counting after polls closed, rather than having to wait til *Thursday.*
Anonymous wrote:Also, they can’t start counting provisional ballots with certain Reason codes until they have waited long enough to be sure a mail in ballot wasn’t received (for those who requested mail in ballots but for some reason decided to vote in person instead). I don’t think that can start until Friday. And there may be enough of those to make a difference in the close races.
Anonymous wrote:We can send rockets to outer space, build multi million dollar aircraft carriers, spend trillions for government programs but we can’t, just can’t find a way to digitally snap ballots or implement or more transparent voter accounting system than having volunteers hand count ballots for 8 hrs a day. Hmmmmm wonder why that is
Anonymous wrote:We can send rockets to outer space, build multi million dollar aircraft carriers, spend trillions for government programs but we can’t, just can’t find a way to digitally snap ballots or implement or more transparent voter accounting system than having volunteers hand count ballots for 8 hrs a day. Hmmmmm wonder why that is
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it’s taking too long, you should have volunteered. It’s all volunteers you know. One democrat and one republican for each 50 ballots.
Op here and I forgot they were volunteers. So kudos to them! However, my opinion still stands. It’s taking much longer than I expected. Growing up we used to have the election results the day after.
Mail-in ballots weren't a thing when you were growing up.
Actually they were, different pp here, but I lived in a state where they started counting them right after the cast ballots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats gleefully pointing to Hogan’s veto to cover up for their incompetently run administrative state.
Exactly. Hogan really screwed things up by not letting dems start counting mail in ballots before the election, so they’d know how many votes they needed to come up with on the final count to ensure the preferred candidates all won their primaries.
Damn that Larry Hogan!
Anonymous wrote:Also, they can’t start counting provisional ballots with certain Reason codes until they have waited long enough to be sure a mail in ballot wasn’t received (for those who requested mail in ballots but for some reason decided to vote in person instead). I don’t think that can start until Friday. And there may be enough of those to make a difference in the close races.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats gleefully pointing to Hogan’s veto to cover up for their incompetently run administrative state.
Exactly. Hogan really screwed things up by not letting dems start counting mail in ballots before the election, so they’d know how many votes they needed to come up with on the final count to ensure the preferred candidates all won their primaries.
Damn that Larry Hogan!
Anonymous wrote:Not OP, but after receiving countless "please volunteer" emails from the Board of Elections last year, I went through hours of tedious training, only to be told, "thanks, we have enough volunteers" at the end.
Will NEVER try to help that incompetent group again
Anonymous wrote:Democrats gleefully pointing to Hogan’s veto to cover up for their incompetently run administrative state.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it’s taking too long, you should have volunteered. It’s all volunteers you know. One democrat and one republican for each 50 ballots.
Op here and I forgot they were volunteers. So kudos to them! However, my opinion still stands. It’s taking much longer than I expected. Growing up we used to have the election results the day after.
That’s nice. Without knowing where you grew up, I’ll guess that there were probably a smaller number of ballots to be counted, and/or that the elections weren’t close, so that the results were “known” even though all of the ballots weren’t actually counted yet.
I grew up in 20906.
I'm open to being way off base but it's been 1 week since the elections so that's why I think it's taking a long time. Are other jurisdictions with similar demographics and populations finished counting ballots?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it’s taking too long, you should have volunteered. It’s all volunteers you know. One democrat and one republican for each 50 ballots.
Op here and I forgot they were volunteers. So kudos to them! However, my opinion still stands. It’s taking much longer than I expected. Growing up we used to have the election results the day after.
That’s nice. Without knowing where you grew up, I’ll guess that there were probably a smaller number of ballots to be counted, and/or that the elections weren’t close, so that the results were “known” even though all of the ballots weren’t actually counted yet.