Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Republicans: We hate feds
Democrats: we love feds, but we'll do nothing to support them
Toss a coin. Both parties suck.
Umm there seems to be a big difference between doing nothing and getting ready to dismantle the civil service, don’t you think?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump is not going to run let alone win, you morons.
+10000000. Not a chance but let them fake panic about it for two years.
Anonymous wrote:Republicans: We hate feds
Democrats: we love feds, but we'll do nothing to support them
Toss a coin. Both parties suck.
Anonymous wrote:Trump is not going to run let alone win, you morons.
Anonymous wrote:Call your Senator - this exact issue was the subject of an amendment by Rep. Connolly in the NDAA that has already been passed in the House.
https://www.govexec.com/workforce/2022/07/schedule-f-ban-among-many-workforce-provisions-annual-policy-bill-house-just-passed/374537/
Anonymous wrote:Republicans: We hate feds
Democrats: we love feds, but we'll do nothing to support them
Toss a coin. Both parties suck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I also just read the Axios article. Yes, I am concerned. 2017-2021 were not good years for feds.
https://www.axios.com/2022/07/22/trump-2025-radical-plan-second-term
That’s funny. I thought the Obama years were not good, when he gave us no raises and the sequester happened (Agencies didn’t pay back lost pay in the sequester, so my husband and I each lost a week of pay that year).
Don’t count on a party to be good to the Federal workforce.
OP - No. I’m not worried.
I’m an IT Policy Analyst in the Competitive Service. It’s only for Excepted Service.
The point of schedule F is to transfer people from the competitive service to a position more like the excepted service where you can be fired without cause. You have “Policy” in your position title. Expect it to be designated as schedule F.
Anonymous wrote:Trump is not going to run let alone win, you morons.