Anonymous wrote:I just read the article and it doesn’t say anything about URMs. With your post you may be inadvertently making the author’s point for him.
Anonymous wrote:The authors rationale: education majors have lower SATs but higher GPAs than STEM majors.
Now, this ignores or fails to consider a number of factors. For example, the fact that their are many non-education majors besides STEM— no mention of how GPAs stack up against humanities majors, fine arts majors, business majors. It also ignores the fact that pre-med and engineering are weed out environments and grades are intentionally low to force a certain percent of kids out at many colleges. Or, that to pass STEM classes, you must be good at STEM. But you can be a great English teacher without being strong in STEM. So basically, dumb supporting argument.
He does take the opportunity to strongly imply that Jill Biden isn’t that bright.
Anonymous wrote:Also I want to add the doctoral education degree is definitely watered down compared with other doctoral degrees.
You can do the entire thing online while working full time. No way can you do that with PhDs in other subjects.
And it only takes 3 years or so. Another money maker by universities.
Anonymous wrote:education majors because these majors are “easy” and “you don’t have to know anything”. He also said that public school teachers are trained in “the dumbest part of the dumbest colleges”. Fact check: 75% of teachers are white, and almost 75% are women.
Anonymous wrote:I will say that among doctoral programs, EdD's are generally less respected, in that the research requirement is less rigorous (their journals also tend to set a lower bar). This is true of many fields though (including Physical Therapy, Nursing, Management/Policy).
It is all relative.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Athletes and Legacies too
100% about athletes. All the top athletes at my T10 school (that's also known for being big with NCAA football & basketball), were one of 3 easy majors: communications, marketing, exercise science.
At my school it was geography.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait I read your link and I don't see your subject line claim supported: where does it say *URM* become teachers because they are less talented?
Look at the inset text in the first paragraph: He takes aim at diversity efforts in higher education and says people in those position have education degrees because they are “easy” and “you don’t have to know anything”
From the embedded Channel 5 link:
"In colleges, what you hire now is administrators…. Now, because they are appointing all these diversity officers, what are their degrees in? Education. It's easy. You don't have to know anything."
Uh no. It doesn't say anything about URMs. It says Diversity Officers (who by the way, are so often white that I've seen a hilarious meme about paint samples known as "trustworthy whites" being who make up diversity officials) are education majors and as a result, dumb.
Do you folks ever tell the truth. The link says “diversity efforts” and references “public school teachers” as being low performing in the text above and the discussion below. You need to link to a discussion of “diversity officers” because this is not in the linked text.