Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The protesters are obeying the law, constantly moving. There isn't anything Montgomery County can do about it.

And there have been protests like this in front of liberal politicians' houses. They didn't stop those either.

I say this as someone who thinks only losers take their protests to a person's house. And I'm as pro-choice as they come. Like, women can have as many abortions, for any reason, as they can medically handle. I don't care. But taking protests to people's homes, where innocent spouses, parents, and kids live, is over the top.

I feel exactly the same way.

No and here is why.

1. They literally are killing women with their crap decisions.
2. Peaceful protesting is 100% in the Constitution which by the nature of their jobs they knew when they signed on.
3. Kavanaugh in particular used his kid as a prop. He does that daily. I have been in restaurants and how he and his wife treat servers is discusting. Spare us worried about him and his family.
4. ACB miss handmaiden who is unqualified who cares. She wants us to be birthing vessels. Maybe her kids will grow up and understand peaceful protesting again in the Constitution

They knew the job when they took office.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The protesters are obeying the law, constantly moving. There isn't anything Montgomery County can do about it.

And there have been protests like this in front of liberal politicians' houses. They didn't stop those either.

I say this as someone who thinks only losers take their protests to a person's house. And I'm as pro-choice as they come. Like, women can have as many abortions, for any reason, as they can medically handle. I don't care. But taking protests to people's homes, where innocent spouses, parents, and kids live, is over the top.

I feel exactly the same way.

No and here is why.

1. They literally are killing women with their crap decisions.
2. Peaceful protesting is 100% in the Constitution which by the nature of their jobs they knew when they signed on.
3. Kavanaugh in particular used his kid as a prop. He does that daily. I have been in restaurants and how he and his wife treat servers is discusting. Spare us worried about him and his family.
4. ACB miss handmaiden who is unqualified who cares. She wants us to be birthing vessels. Maybe her kids will grow up and understand peaceful protesting again in the Constitution

They knew the job when they took office.

Fascinating that you dine within earshot of him. On multiple occasions. Oh, and your reference to “his kid” Adds to your credibility.

Man spending your Saturday defending brett kavanaugh’s rights to be immune from protest when he is one of 9 people appointed to a lifetime position in the most influential component of the judicial branch is really a choice.

Man - you did not address your lack of credibility. There is no “defense of Kavanaugh” in the statement above, Man.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I live near the Supreme Court and there are constant protests. It’s fine.

For you. It’s fine for you.

Who is it not fine for? And is it as not fine as carrying a non viable fetus?

Harassing folks changes their minds does it? Low class people with free time on their hands do this garbage. Pathetic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I live near the Supreme Court and there are constant protests. It’s fine.

For you. It’s fine for you.

Who is it not fine for? And is it as not fine as carrying a non viable fetus?

Harassing folks changes their minds does it? Low class people with free time on their hands do this garbage. Pathetic.

I agree that everyone protesting in front of abortion clinics is garbage

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The protesters are obeying the law, constantly moving. There isn't anything Montgomery County can do about it.

And there have been protests like this in front of liberal politicians' houses. They didn't stop those either.

I say this as someone who thinks only losers take their protests to a person's house. And I'm as pro-choice as they come. Like, women can have as many abortions, for any reason, as they can medically handle. I don't care. But taking protests to people's homes, where innocent spouses, parents, and kids live, is over the top.

I feel exactly the same way.

No and here is why.

1. They literally are killing women with their crap decisions.
2. Peaceful protesting is 100% in the Constitution which by the nature of their jobs they knew when they signed on.
3. Kavanaugh in particular used his kid as a prop. He does that daily. I have been in restaurants and how he and his wife treat servers is discusting. Spare us worried about him and his family.
4. ACB miss handmaiden who is unqualified who cares. She wants us to be birthing vessels. Maybe her kids will grow up and understand peaceful protesting again in the Constitution

They knew the job when they took office.

Fascinating that you dine within earshot of him. On multiple occasions. Oh, and your reference to “his kid” Adds to your credibility.

Man spending your Saturday defending brett kavanaugh’s rights to be immune from protest when he is one of 9 people appointed to a lifetime position in the most influential component of the judicial branch is really a choice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I live near the Supreme Court and there are constant protests. It’s fine.

For you. It’s fine for you.

Who is it not fine for? And is it as not fine as carrying a non viable fetus?

Harassing folks changes their minds does it? Low class people with free time on their hands do this garbage. Pathetic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I live near the Supreme Court and there are constant protests. It’s fine.

For you. It’s fine for you.

Who is it not fine for? And is it as not fine as carrying a non viable fetus?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The protesters are obeying the law, constantly moving. There isn't anything Montgomery County can do about it.

And there have been protests like this in front of liberal politicians' houses. They didn't stop those either.

I say this as someone who thinks only losers take their protests to a person's house. And I'm as pro-choice as they come. Like, women can have as many abortions, for any reason, as they can medically handle. I don't care. But taking protests to people's homes, where innocent spouses, parents, and kids live, is over the top.

I feel exactly the same way.

No and here is why.

1. They literally are killing women with their crap decisions.
2. Peaceful protesting is 100% in the Constitution which by the nature of their jobs they knew when they signed on.
3. Kavanaugh in particular used his kid as a prop. He does that daily. I have been in restaurants and how he and his wife treat servers is discusting. Spare us worried about him and his family.
4. ACB miss handmaiden who is unqualified who cares. She wants us to be birthing vessels. Maybe her kids will grow up and understand peaceful protesting again in the Constitution

They knew the job when they took office.

Fascinating that you dine within earshot of him. On multiple occasions. Oh, and your reference to “his kid” Adds to your credibility.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I live near the Supreme Court and there are constant protests. It’s fine.

For you. It’s fine for you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The protesters are obeying the law, constantly moving. There isn't anything Montgomery County can do about it.

And there have been protests like this in front of liberal politicians' houses. They didn't stop those either.

I say this as someone who thinks only losers take their protests to a person's house. And I'm as pro-choice as they come. Like, women can have as many abortions, for any reason, as they can medically handle. I don't care. But taking protests to people's homes, where innocent spouses, parents, and kids live, is over the top.

I feel exactly the same way.

No and here is why.

1. They literally are killing women with their crap decisions.
2. Peaceful protesting is 100% in the Constitution which by the nature of their jobs they knew when they signed on.
3. Kavanaugh in particular used his kid as a prop. He does that daily. I have been in restaurants and how he and his wife treat servers is discusting. Spare us worried about him and his family.
4. ACB miss handmaiden who is unqualified who cares. She wants us to be birthing vessels. Maybe her kids will grow up and understand peaceful protesting again in the Constitution

They knew the job when they took office.

Anonymous wrote:I live near the Supreme Court and there are constant protests. It’s fine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The protesters are obeying the law, constantly moving. There isn't anything Montgomery County can do about it.

And there have been protests like this in front of liberal politicians' houses. They didn't stop those either.

I say this as someone who thinks only losers take their protests to a person's house. And I'm as pro-choice as they come. Like, women can have as many abortions, for any reason, as they can medically handle. I don't care. But taking protests to people's homes, where innocent spouses, parents, and kids live, is over the top.

They’re not obeying the law since protesting outside a judge’s home is not legal. It’s a different case for politicians.

It’s not illegal for f it’s intended to intimidate or affect an outcome but I think it’s clear no one thinks it’s going to change their minds-it’s peaceful comeuppance which they richly deserve. If they didn’t want to be public figures they shouldn’t have become sc justices ffs.

Should be it iS illegal if intended to intimidate…

No
And it is not illegal to intimide in front of an Abortion Clinic. So yeah you got nothing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The protesters are obeying the law, constantly moving. There isn't anything Montgomery County can do about it.

And there have been protests like this in front of liberal politicians' houses. They didn't stop those either.

I say this as someone who thinks only losers take their protests to a person's house. And I'm as pro-choice as they come. Like, women can have as many abortions, for any reason, as they can medically handle. I don't care. But taking protests to people's homes, where innocent spouses, parents, and kids live, is over the top.

They’re not obeying the law since protesting outside a judge’s home is not legal. It’s a different case for politicians.

It’s not illegal for f it’s intended to intimidate or affect an outcome but I think it’s clear no one thinks it’s going to change their minds-it’s peaceful comeuppance which they richly deserve. If they didn’t want to be public figures they shouldn’t have become sc justices ffs.

Should be it iS illegal if intended to intimidate…

No
And it is not illegal to intimide in front of an Abortion Clinic. So yeah you got nothing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The protesters are obeying the law, constantly moving. There isn't anything Montgomery County can do about it.

And there have been protests like this in front of liberal politicians' houses. They didn't stop those either.

I say this as someone who thinks only losers take their protests to a person's house. And I'm as pro-choice as they come. Like, women can have as many abortions, for any reason, as they can medically handle. I don't care. But taking protests to people's homes, where innocent spouses, parents, and kids live, is over the top.

They’re not obeying the law since protesting outside a judge’s home is not legal. It’s a different case for politicians.

It’s not illegal for f it’s intended to intimidate or affect an outcome but I think it’s clear no one thinks it’s going to change their minds-it’s peaceful comeuppance which they richly deserve. If they didn’t want to be public figures they shouldn’t have become sc justices ffs.

Should be it iS illegal if intended to intimidate…

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The protesters are obeying the law, constantly moving. There isn't anything Montgomery County can do about it.

And there have been protests like this in front of liberal politicians' houses. They didn't stop those either.

I say this as someone who thinks only losers take their protests to a person's house. And I'm as pro-choice as they come. Like, women can have as many abortions, for any reason, as they can medically handle. I don't care. But taking protests to people's homes, where innocent spouses, parents, and kids live, is over the top.

I feel exactly the same way.