Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Given all this talk of men and salaries... what should a man be making in his 30s to be considered marriage material by women?
I would say $200K is the new $100K, would not date anyone who made less. Life is just too expensive. Also, it's a little less than I earn and I consider myself pretty feeble so a man earning less must have some serious issues unless involved in a high-prestige or high-creativity low-paying career, like basically science research/professional musician/published writer/working artist.
That said, a guy who is successful in one of these lesser-paid areas who is willing to shoulder more burden at home and is nice, fun/funny, brings an interesting life & social circle to the table, and is a good partner could also be appealing. Between the two of us $350+ is a nice lifestyle with the right person and 1-2 children.
And exactly what do you bring to the relationship other than sex?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Given all this talk of men and salaries... what should a man be making in his 30s to be considered marriage material by women?
I would say $200K is the new $100K, would not date anyone who made less. Life is just too expensive. Also, it's a little less than I earn and I consider myself pretty feeble so a man earning less must have some serious issues unless involved in a high-prestige or high-creativity low-paying career, like basically science research/professional musician/published writer/working artist.
That said, a guy who is successful in one of these lesser-paid areas who is willing to shoulder more burden at home and is nice, fun/funny, brings an interesting life & social circle to the table, and is a good partner could also be appealing. Between the two of us $350+ is a nice lifestyle with the right person and 1-2 children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Given all this talk of men and salaries... what should a man be making in his 30s to be considered marriage material by women?
I would say $200K is the new $100K, would not date anyone who made less. Life is just too expensive. Also, it's a little less than I earn and I consider myself pretty feeble so a man earning less must have some serious issues unless involved in a high-prestige or high-creativity low-paying career, like basically science research/professional musician/published writer/working artist.
That said, a guy who is successful in one of these lesser-paid areas who is willing to shoulder more burden at home and is nice, fun/funny, brings an interesting life & social circle to the table, and is a good partner could also be appealing. Between the two of us $350+ is a nice lifestyle with the right person and 1-2 children.
Lol you sound absolutely miserable to be around. The amount of single men making 200k is so small that you are limiting your dating pool to maybe 1% of the the entire US population. I guarantee you are not a 1% catch either.
I am so happy I moved out of DC years ago to get away from people like this.
I'm the above poster and I wasn't really referring to someone who is 30 or 32. When my DH was that age we both made $75K. But but late 30s you should be looking at $180K or above, and in your 40s $200K and above ideally.
If you work in the government - which is a great, secure job with a lot of benefits - it’s unlikely you’ll ever make $200k plus. But two GS-15s or equivalent making $300k still have a very good QOL in this area and are doing better than the vast majority of Americans.
I can’t believe the kind of stuff i read on here sometimes!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Given all this talk of men and salaries... what should a man be making in his 30s to be considered marriage material by women?
I would say $200K is the new $100K, would not date anyone who made less. Life is just too expensive. Also, it's a little less than I earn and I consider myself pretty feeble so a man earning less must have some serious issues unless involved in a high-prestige or high-creativity low-paying career, like basically science research/professional musician/published writer/working artist.
That said, a guy who is successful in one of these lesser-paid areas who is willing to shoulder more burden at home and is nice, fun/funny, brings an interesting life & social circle to the table, and is a good partner could also be appealing. Between the two of us $350+ is a nice lifestyle with the right person and 1-2 children.
Lol you sound absolutely miserable to be around. The amount of single men making 200k is so small that you are limiting your dating pool to maybe 1% of the the entire US population. I guarantee you are not a 1% catch either.
I am so happy I moved out of DC years ago to get away from people like this.
I'm the above poster and I wasn't really referring to someone who is 30 or 32. When my DH was that age we both made $75K. But but late 30s you should be looking at $180K or above, and in your 40s $200K and above ideally.
If you work in the government - which is a great, secure job with a lot of benefits - it’s unlikely you’ll ever make $200k plus. But two GS-15s or equivalent making $300k still have a very good QOL in this area and are doing better than the vast majority of Americans.
I can’t believe the kind of stuff i read on here sometimes!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Given all this talk of men and salaries... what should a man be making in his 30s to be considered marriage material by women?
I would say $200K is the new $100K, would not date anyone who made less. Life is just too expensive. Also, it's a little less than I earn and I consider myself pretty feeble so a man earning less must have some serious issues unless involved in a high-prestige or high-creativity low-paying career, like basically science research/professional musician/published writer/working artist.
That said, a guy who is successful in one of these lesser-paid areas who is willing to shoulder more burden at home and is nice, fun/funny, brings an interesting life & social circle to the table, and is a good partner could also be appealing. Between the two of us $350+ is a nice lifestyle with the right person and 1-2 children.
Lol you sound absolutely miserable to be around. The amount of single men making 200k is so small that you are limiting your dating pool to maybe 1% of the the entire US population. I guarantee you are not a 1% catch either.
I am so happy I moved out of DC years ago to get away from people like this.
I'm the above poster and I wasn't really referring to someone who is 30 or 32. When my DH was that age we both made $75K. But but late 30s you should be looking at $180K or above, and in your 40s $200K and above ideally.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a type A personality. I want to be with someone who is driven to succeed. Like it or not, the measure of success is financial in the country.
I’m always trying to improve at work and am looking at what it takes to get to the next level. I don’t think I would be happy with a beta personality. So my answer is if I can earn $200k, why can’t he?
Anonymous wrote:I’m a type A personality. I want to be with someone who is driven to succeed. Like it or not, the measure of success is financial in the country.
I’m always trying to improve at work and am looking at what it takes to get to the next level. I don’t think I would be happy with a beta personality. So my answer is if I can earn $200k, why can’t he?
Anonymous wrote:I’m a type A personality. I want to be with someone who is driven to succeed. Like it or not, the measure of success is financial in the country.
I’m always trying to improve at work and am looking at what it takes to get to the next level. I don’t think I would be happy with a beta personality. So my answer is if I can earn $200k, why can’t he?
Anonymous wrote:I’m a type A personality. I want to be with someone who is driven to succeed. Like it or not, the measure of success is financial in the country.
I’m always trying to improve at work and am looking at what it takes to get to the next level. I don’t think I would be happy with a beta personality. So my answer is if I can earn $200k, why can’t he?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Given all this talk of men and salaries... what should a man be making in his 30s to be considered marriage material by women?
I would say $200K is the new $100K, would not date anyone who made less. Life is just too expensive. Also, it's a little less than I earn and I consider myself pretty feeble so a man earning less must have some serious issues unless involved in a high-prestige or high-creativity low-paying career, like basically science research/professional musician/published writer/working artist.
That said, a guy who is successful in one of these lesser-paid areas who is willing to shoulder more burden at home and is nice, fun/funny, brings an interesting life & social circle to the table, and is a good partner could also be appealing. Between the two of us $350+ is a nice lifestyle with the right person and 1-2 children.
Lol you sound absolutely miserable to be around. The amount of single men making 200k is so small that you are limiting your dating pool to maybe 1% of the the entire US population. I guarantee you are not a 1% catch either.
I am so happy I moved out of DC years ago to get away from people like this.