Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But lower stats kids did get in. That’s why we know stats are not relevant to VT.
Obviously, those "lower stats" kids had things your kid did not. You have no idea what they brought to the table - what kinds of EC, leadership, commitments outside of school, interests, etc. No idea whatsoever. You also have no idea the rigor of their classes, etc. In short, you simply don't know, though you obviously think you have all the answers.
One thing is for certain - VT is not closely examining or carefully scrutinizing each of its 45,000 applications.
They DO read the essays, which they deem "very important."
I'm sure the essays are read, but there's not enough time and admissions staff to give all of them THAT close a look. Some applications are weeded out early to focus on others.
Unless you are an adcom, you have no way of saying what happens. If it was so easy, why do we wait weeks and weeks to hear back from some of these schools?
Many schools hire temporary staff to read through them and rank order them. My neighbor did this for UC Berkeley.
No school is rank ordering 45,000 applications (e.g. that kid'e application is ranked 36, 264).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But lower stats kids did get in. That’s why we know stats are not relevant to VT.
Obviously, those "lower stats" kids had things your kid did not. You have no idea what they brought to the table - what kinds of EC, leadership, commitments outside of school, interests, etc. No idea whatsoever. You also have no idea the rigor of their classes, etc. In short, you simply don't know, though you obviously think you have all the answers.
One thing is for certain - VT is not closely examining or carefully scrutinizing each of its 45,000 applications.
They DO read the essays, which they deem "very important."
I'm sure the essays are read, but there's not enough time and admissions staff to give all of them THAT close a look. Some applications are weeded out early to focus on others.
Unless you are an adcom, you have no way of saying what happens. If it was so easy, why do we wait weeks and weeks to hear back from some of these schools?
Many schools hire temporary staff to read through them and rank order them. My neighbor did this for UC Berkeley.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But lower stats kids did get in. That’s why we know stats are not relevant to VT.
Obviously, those "lower stats" kids had things your kid did not. You have no idea what they brought to the table - what kinds of EC, leadership, commitments outside of school, interests, etc. No idea whatsoever. You also have no idea the rigor of their classes, etc. In short, you simply don't know, though you obviously think you have all the answers.
One thing is for certain - VT is not closely examining or carefully scrutinizing each of its 45,000 applications.
They DO read the essays, which they deem "very important."
I'm sure the essays are read, but there's not enough time and admissions staff to give all of them THAT close a look. Some applications are weeded out early to focus on others.
Unless you are an adcom, you have no way of saying what happens. If it was so easy, why do we wait weeks and weeks to hear back from some of these schools?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But lower stats kids did get in. That’s why we know stats are not relevant to VT.
Obviously, those "lower stats" kids had things your kid did not. You have no idea what they brought to the table - what kinds of EC, leadership, commitments outside of school, interests, etc. No idea whatsoever. You also have no idea the rigor of their classes, etc. In short, you simply don't know, though you obviously think you have all the answers.
One thing is for certain - VT is not closely examining or carefully scrutinizing each of its 45,000 applications.
They DO read the essays, which they deem "very important."
I'm sure the essays are read, but there's not enough time and admissions staff to give all of them THAT close a look. Some applications are weeded out early to focus on others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But lower stats kids did get in. That’s why we know stats are not relevant to VT.
The are just not the *only* thing that's relevant
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But lower stats kids did get in. That’s why we know stats are not relevant to VT.
Obviously, those "lower stats" kids had things your kid did not. You have no idea what they brought to the table - what kinds of EC, leadership, commitments outside of school, interests, etc. No idea whatsoever. You also have no idea the rigor of their classes, etc. In short, you simply don't know, though you obviously think you have all the answers.
One thing is for certain - VT is not closely examining or carefully scrutinizing each of its 45,000 applications.
They DO read the essays, which they deem "very important."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But lower stats kids did get in. That’s why we know stats are not relevant to VT.
Obviously, those "lower stats" kids had things your kid did not. You have no idea what they brought to the table - what kinds of EC, leadership, commitments outside of school, interests, etc. No idea whatsoever. You also have no idea the rigor of their classes, etc. In short, you simply don't know, though you obviously think you have all the answers.
One thing is for certain - VT is not closely examining or carefully scrutinizing each of its 45,000 applications.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But lower stats kids did get in. That’s why we know stats are not relevant to VT.
Obviously, those "lower stats" kids had things your kid did not. You have no idea what they brought to the table - what kinds of EC, leadership, commitments outside of school, interests, etc. No idea whatsoever. You also have no idea the rigor of their classes, etc. In short, you simply don't know, though you obviously think you have all the answers.
Anonymous wrote:But lower stats kids did get in. That’s why we know stats are not relevant to VT.
Anonymous wrote:But lower stats kids did get in. That’s why we know stats are not relevant to VT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Grades seemed the most important based on Naviance. It was one of the schools that had an easy to see line - almost everyone got in with a GPA over x and few got in below that number. The Test scores were not as easy to assess.Anonymous wrote:VT does not focus on grades and test scores. I have no idea what they do care about though.
Maybe at your kid’s school. UVA had a clear line which we appreciated. VT did not for my kid’s school. And results for class of 2022 were even harder to predict. Many high stats kids did not get in. They are clearly chasing something other than grades and test scores.
Anonymous wrote:Grades seemed the most important based on Naviance. It was one of the schools that had an easy to see line - almost everyone got in with a GPA over x and few got in below that number. The Test scores were not as easy to assess.Anonymous wrote:VT does not focus on grades and test scores. I have no idea what they do care about though.