Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, provided that my parent(s) is/are still under 72 when and if they need that kind of support. However, if one lives to the age of 72, the mere fact that they're alive should be good enough for them, as most people that age aren't even alive, let alone living luxurious lives. However, if they need anything from me between now and each of their 72nd birthdays, no questions asked; I'm there for them.
Lol @ “should be good enough for them”
Aren’t you the caring one?!?!
Anonymous wrote:Yes, provided that my parent(s) is/are still under 72 when and if they need that kind of support. However, if one lives to the age of 72, the mere fact that they're alive should be good enough for them, as most people that age aren't even alive, let alone living luxurious lives. However, if they need anything from me between now and each of their 72nd birthdays, no questions asked; I'm there for them.
Anonymous wrote:Obligated? No.
Are you a crappy kid if you have the means to but don’t? Yes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's a strange scenario and it sounds like they are terrible financial managers if they chose to fund your college and a house before their retirement. College is one thing but if they were in precarious financial shape I can't believe you accepted a house. I would certainly support them to the extent that the house has limited their retirement income going forward.
+1 This scenario makes no sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obligated? No.
Are you a crappy kid if you have the means to but don’t? Yes.
+1
Anonymous wrote:That's a strange scenario and it sounds like they are terrible financial managers if they chose to fund your college and a house before their retirement. College is one thing but if they were in precarious financial shape I can't believe you accepted a house. I would certainly support them to the extent that the house has limited their retirement income going forward.