Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will never understanding rewarding people for being lazy like you’re doing them a favor. People like OP’s brother will blow through that money, and when he’s left with nothing, he won’t even have OP to turn to because mom will have blown up that bridge.
There are times when unequal inheritances can make sense. Disabilities that require money for assistance, for example. But just because kids chose different life paths and one is “more successful”? What if OP has a debilitating car accident and can no longer work? What if OP ends up divorced and scraping by? What if the brother hits the lottery? No one knows what the future will bring. Treat your kids equally if you want them to have any relationship at all.
Again, this poster is ignoring the fact that the brother lives with and presumably takes care of many things for the money and will only do more as she ages. That's worth something. He may be professionally "lazy," but why should the mother care about that? What's important is what he's doing for the mother -- and it's HER money. She very well may see the brother as making sacrifices for her that the OP isn't doing, and as time goes on and she ages, trust me -- he will be doing a lot for her on a daily basis, simply because he lives with her, and OP won't be doing those things. In fact, OP will (or should be) happier knowing that her mother isn't alone while OP continues to live her wildly successful life free of the shackles of her mother's care.
Anonymous wrote:OP is completely ignoring the fact that her brother has been living with their mother and presumably assisting her way more than OP is, and the burden will only get bigger as she ages. OP should be grateful for that, and recognize that it might come at a price.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will never understanding rewarding people for being lazy like you’re doing them a favor. People like OP’s brother will blow through that money, and when he’s left with nothing, he won’t even have OP to turn to because mom will have blown up that bridge.
There are times when unequal inheritances can make sense. Disabilities that require money for assistance, for example. But just because kids chose different life paths and one is “more successful”? What if OP has a debilitating car accident and can no longer work? What if OP ends up divorced and scraping by? What if the brother hits the lottery? No one knows what the future will bring. Treat your kids equally if you want them to have any relationship at all.
Again, this poster is ignoring the fact that the brother lives with and presumably takes care of many things for the money and will only do more as she ages. That's worth something. He may be professionally "lazy," but why should the mother care about that? What's important is what he's doing for the mother -- and it's HER money. She very well may see the brother as making sacrifices for her that the OP isn't doing, and as time goes on and she ages, trust me -- he will be doing a lot for her on a daily basis, simply because he lives with her, and OP won't be doing those things. In fact, OP will (or should be) happier knowing that her mother isn't alone while OP continues to live her wildly successful life free of the shackles of her mother's care.
Anonymous wrote:"Mom, it feels like you are rewarding Larlo for quitting work just because he dislikes it, when he has no barriers to getting another job. I work hard despite everything, and it feels like you are punishing me for being the diligent one. I'm also concerned about Larlo's future. In fact, I worry that he will burn through whatever money you leave him and then turn to me for help. I don't think leaving him more more than me is going to have a good outcome for him, or me, or our relationship."
Anonymous wrote:I will never understanding rewarding people for being lazy like you’re doing them a favor. People like OP’s brother will blow through that money, and when he’s left with nothing, he won’t even have OP to turn to because mom will have blown up that bridge.
There are times when unequal inheritances can make sense. Disabilities that require money for assistance, for example. But just because kids chose different life paths and one is “more successful”? What if OP has a debilitating car accident and can no longer work? What if OP ends up divorced and scraping by? What if the brother hits the lottery? No one knows what the future will bring. Treat your kids equally if you want them to have any relationship at all.
Anonymous wrote:My parents did this and I have not spoken to them for 10 years. I have completely cut them off. It's not the money, it's the inequity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP is completely ignoring the fact that her brother has been living with their mother and presumably assisting her way more than OP is, and the burden will only get bigger as she ages. OP should be grateful for that, and recognize that it might come at a price.
This.
Anonymous wrote:It’s none of your business how she divides things. You should be grateful and appreciative for whatever you get.
Anonymous wrote:OP is completely ignoring the fact that her brother has been living with their mother and presumably assisting her way more than OP is, and the burden will only get bigger as she ages. OP should be grateful for that, and recognize that it might come at a price.