Anonymous wrote:No. In fact, they’re more entitled and feel they can get away with more bad behavior.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In my experience -- YES!
The reason is pretty simple: private schools do not have to accept (or keep) disrespectful, troublemaking, or otherwise misbehaving students.
This is so FALSE. Beyond FALSE. The number of kids who get away with godawful sh!t at private schools is staggering. There are fewer kids in private than public so it may SEEM like that. As a private school parent for the last 14 years, I can't even count the number of HORRIBLE children who get admitted because the parents guarantee a certain amount of money. I know FOUR families who's misbehaving miscreants are "transferring" to other schools outside of the application process because of money.
The kids don't get kicked out. And the kids who should not be admitted are admitted because the Heads around here are competing to build the biggest endowment. Lots of BDE amongst the private administration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In my experience -- YES!
The reason is pretty simple: private schools do not have to accept (or keep) disrespectful, troublemaking, or otherwise misbehaving students.
This is so FALSE. Beyond FALSE. The number of kids who get away with godawful sh!t at private schools is staggering. There are fewer kids in private than public so it may SEEM like that. As a private school parent for the last 14 years, I can't even count the number of HORRIBLE children who get admitted because the parents guarantee a certain amount of money. I know FOUR families who's misbehaving miscreants are "transferring" to other schools outside of the application process because of money.
The kids don't get kicked out. And the kids who should not be admitted are admitted because the Heads around here are competing to build the biggest endowment. Lots of BDE amongst the private administration.
Anonymous wrote:In my experience -- YES!
The reason is pretty simple: private schools do not have to accept (or keep) disrespectful, troublemaking, or otherwise misbehaving students.
Anonymous wrote:This thread is delightful and so messed up. Our private is terrified of reputational risk and will only remove a kid for really extreme behaviors. My daughter had a kid in her class this year that disrupted things every day. Emotionally needy kid who constantly ruined things for others. Physically aggressive and accused by one family of being sexually aggressive with their daughter. Aaaand, he's returning next year. We have mostly been in private but I think there are a lot of private school kids who are there because they couldn't hack public.
Anonymous wrote:Better behaved in the classroom? Sure, due to a variety of factors (stricter policies, kids with more resources and oversight, etc.).
Better behaved outside of school? No.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The bad behavior kids are already kicked out so hard to know.
Please tell me what school this is. In my experience schools just ignore it, especially if parents donate a lot in money or time. It’s a huge detriment to the kid and other students, but happens all the time.