Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This makes no sense. FDA already regulates tea. They’re not going to authorize false and misleading mislabeling/misbranding in violation of their own statute.
Just checked in with FDA source. I missed a key word. The planned name-designation is Sweet Tea Leaf.
Doesn't mean it will be legalized, but it if/when it is, it will be called Sweet Tea Leaf, at least on an official basis.
What nonsense are you talking about? It’ll be called cannabis.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This makes no sense. FDA already regulates tea. They’re not going to authorize false and misleading mislabeling/misbranding in violation of their own statute.
Just checked in with FDA source. I missed a key word. The planned name-designation is Sweet Tea Leaf.
Doesn't mean it will be legalized, but it if/when it is, it will be called Sweet Tea Leaf, at least on an official basis.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:sure, it's all about the money, right. can't wait to see the smoke shops in Bethesda and Potomac.
Lmao they’re already there and they’re busy with customers all the time. I go around 12 during the week and I’m always the youngest at 35.
Anonymous wrote:sure, it's all about the money, right. can't wait to see the smoke shops in Bethesda and Potomac.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you think it could happen before the next presidential election?
As much as I’m desperately wanting this to happen, it CANNOT be allowed to happen BEFORE the election. It needs to be a campaign promise, something to drive people to the polls for. If it becomes law before the election, voters won’t turn out for us. People need to have incentive. Making it federally legal everywhere before the election removes all incentive for people to turn out to vote.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This makes no sense. FDA already regulates tea. They’re not going to authorize false and misleading mislabeling/misbranding in violation of their own statute.
Just checked in with FDA source. I missed a key word. The planned name-designation is Sweet Tea Leaf.
Doesn't mean it will be legalized, but it if/when it is, it will be called Sweet Tea Leaf, at least on an official basis.
Why is this? It seems misleading? And confusing with the common usage of “tea” in a way that seems very unlike the FDA.
Because it's non-factual. A fiction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This makes no sense. FDA already regulates tea. They’re not going to authorize false and misleading mislabeling/misbranding in violation of their own statute.
Just checked in with FDA source. I missed a key word. The planned name-designation is Sweet Tea Leaf.
Doesn't mean it will be legalized, but it if/when it is, it will be called Sweet Tea Leaf, at least on an official basis.
Why is this? It seems misleading? And confusing with the common usage of “tea” in a way that seems very unlike the FDA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This makes no sense. FDA already regulates tea. They’re not going to authorize false and misleading mislabeling/misbranding in violation of their own statute.
Just checked in with FDA source. I missed a key word. The planned name-designation is Sweet Tea Leaf.
Doesn't mean it will be legalized, but it if/when it is, it will be called Sweet Tea Leaf, at least on an official basis.
Anonymous wrote:Nope, it's getting obvious the Republican as*****es will regain the majority in the mid term elections.Along with gun control, this is an issue they will vote down, if it gets that far.
Anonymous wrote:Do you think it could happen before the next presidential election?
Anonymous wrote:This makes no sense. FDA already regulates tea. They’re not going to authorize false and misleading mislabeling/misbranding in violation of their own statute.