Anonymous
05/31/2022 22:18
Subject: Re:Churchill online threat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More than one student has made threats. The administration has not been forthcoming about that.
Then enlighten us here, PP.
In addition to the now widely-circulated message attributed to the special needs student (who may be "harmless" but is a total menace in the hallways with his vulgar and racist outbursts), there are chat messages that name specific students and staff as targets. These were sent by at least one other student. It was alluded to in the first email Taylor sent to parents, but today's message addresses only the situation with the one student.
This is inappropriate speculation about a minor child.
You couldn't PAY me to send my kids to Churchill for many, many reasons, but this kind of speculation and doxing is not okay.
A friend of mine had this happen to her child in a different state, different school district: the child made no threats whatsoever, but other kids accused them of it, the family was doxed and things escalated from there.
Please stop spreading the message to your kids that autistic kids "shoot up schools." I myself have heard that exact quote from more than one student in mcps. It's intrigue, toxic, and terrible.
It isn't speculation when most of Churchill has seen the threats to rape and kill specific students and teachers. And you're the only one who has asserted that he has autism.
This is sick. If I was threatened in this way, I’d call the police and file charges. Y’all need to do that and take care of all the innocents suffering. Why do you abide this?
Anonymous
05/31/2022 22:15
Subject: Re:Churchill online threat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone with kids at Churchill keeping their kids home tomorrow?
My kids know several students who are not going in tomorrow.
COVID poses a bigger concern for safety. 127 cases right now at Churchill. That’s a good reason to keep kids home.
I think a good chunk of this number includes seniors who as of today are no longer in school. The senior beach trip took its toll. Lots of students missed prom.
And some went to prom knowing that they had COVID.
So what? If you chose to attend prom you were clearly willing to take the chance of catching Covid, from someone knowingly infected or not.
Churchill takeaway:
"You don't have to worry about protecting the most vulnerable. Indeed, it's fine to spread rumors about them! Life is a zero sum game and you're a winner!"
Like I said, you couldn't pay me to send kids there.
Anonymous
05/31/2022 22:12
Subject: Re:Churchill online threat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More than one student has made threats. The administration has not been forthcoming about that.
Then enlighten us here, PP.
In addition to the now widely-circulated message attributed to the special needs student (who may be "harmless" but is a total menace in the hallways with his vulgar and racist outbursts), there are chat messages that name specific students and staff as targets. These were sent by at least one other student. It was alluded to in the first email Taylor sent to parents, but today's message addresses only the situation with the one student.
This is inappropriate speculation about a minor child.
You couldn't PAY me to send my kids to Churchill for many, many reasons, but this kind of speculation and doxing is not okay.
A friend of mine had this happen to her child in a different state, different school district: the child made no threats whatsoever, but other kids accused them of it, the family was doxed and things escalated from there.
Please stop spreading the message to your kids that autistic kids "shoot up schools." I myself have heard that exact quote from more than one student in mcps. It's intrigue, toxic, and terrible.
I mean, that's what MCPS keeps pushing. That mental heath is the underlying cause of all violence in the schools, and counselors and wellness centers will make everything OK. They don't care at all that they are stigmatizing kids with mental health and neuro differences.
This is exactly apot on and I suspect prescient. I can feel a backlash coming against people with mental or developmental differences now that every incident is blamed on "mental health."
In reality, autistic people are stickers for following the rules and have been found to be much LESS likely to commit crimes.
Exactly.
It was a few years ago, but after a shooting threat at my kid's school was debunked, I was volunteering for a school event and had three kids explain I was working with explaln that they'd reported the suspected kid because they were autistic and "autistic kids shoot up schools." That's a direct quote.
Did the school ever address that? No. They did not.
Do I think kids are still absorbing that message? I do.
Anonymous
05/31/2022 20:43
Subject: Churchill online threat
Why is it necessary for the article to identify the kid as having "special needs?" That could mean anything from a learning disability, to autism, to a more severe intellectual disability. The kid made a threat. Whether he/she has some sort of disability is irrelevant.
Anonymous
05/31/2022 19:40
Subject: Re:Churchill online threat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More than one student has made threats. The administration has not been forthcoming about that.
Then enlighten us here, PP.
In addition to the now widely-circulated message attributed to the special needs student (who may be "harmless" but is a total menace in the hallways with his vulgar and racist outbursts), there are chat messages that name specific students and staff as targets. These were sent by at least one other student. It was alluded to in the first email Taylor sent to parents, but today's message addresses only the situation with the one student.
This is inappropriate speculation about a minor child.
You couldn't PAY me to send my kids to Churchill for many, many reasons, but this kind of speculation and doxing is not okay.
A friend of mine had this happen to her child in a different state, different school district: the child made no threats whatsoever, but other kids accused them of it, the family was doxed and things escalated from there.
Please stop spreading the message to your kids that autistic kids "shoot up schools." I myself have heard that exact quote from more than one student in mcps. It's intrigue, toxic, and terrible.
Sorry, no. No name is given. We’re done sweeping threats against school kids under the rug so we don’t hurt anyone’s feefees.
There was no threat per administration and police. So stuff it in your sour pants.
Anonymous
05/31/2022 19:39
Subject: Churchill online threat
Who sent the email that said the student had "special needs"? They should be fired.
Anonymous
05/31/2022 19:38
Subject: Re:Churchill online threat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More than one student has made threats. The administration has not been forthcoming about that.
Then enlighten us here, PP.
In addition to the now widely-circulated message attributed to the special needs student (who may be "harmless" but is a total menace in the hallways with his vulgar and racist outbursts), there are chat messages that name specific students and staff as targets. These were sent by at least one other student. It was alluded to in the first email Taylor sent to parents, but today's message addresses only the situation with the one student.
This is inappropriate speculation about a minor child.
You couldn't PAY me to send my kids to Churchill for many, many reasons, but this kind of speculation and doxing is not okay.
A friend of mine had this happen to her child in a different state, different school district: the child made no threats whatsoever, but other kids accused them of it, the family was doxed and things escalated from there.
Please stop spreading the message to your kids that autistic kids "shoot up schools." I myself have heard that exact quote from more than one student in mcps. It's intrigue, toxic, and terrible.
Sorry, no. No name is given. We’re done sweeping threats against school kids under the rug so we don’t hurt anyone’s feefees.
Anonymous
05/31/2022 19:35
Subject: Re:Churchill online threat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More than one student has made threats. The administration has not been forthcoming about that.
Then enlighten us here, PP.
In addition to the now widely-circulated message attributed to the special needs student (who may be "harmless" but is a total menace in the hallways with his vulgar and racist outbursts), there are chat messages that name specific students and staff as targets. These were sent by at least one other student. It was alluded to in the first email Taylor sent to parents, but today's message addresses only the situation with the one student.
This is inappropriate speculation about a minor child.
You couldn't PAY me to send my kids to Churchill for many, many reasons, but this kind of speculation and doxing is not okay.
A friend of mine had this happen to her child in a different state, different school district: the child made no threats whatsoever, but other kids accused them of it, the family was doxed and things escalated from there.
Please stop spreading the message to your kids that autistic kids "shoot up schools." I myself have heard that exact quote from more than one student in mcps. It's intrigue, toxic, and terrible.
I mean, that's what MCPS keeps pushing. That mental heath is the underlying cause of all violence in the schools, and counselors and wellness centers will make everything OK. They don't care at all that they are stigmatizing kids with mental health and neuro differences.
This is exactly apot on and I suspect prescient. I can feel a backlash coming against people with mental or developmental differences now that every incident is blamed on "mental health."
In reality, autistic people are stickers for following the rules and have been found to be much LESS likely to commit crimes.
Students with disabilities are already prime targets at Churchill for bullying which the Churchill administrators have not addressed. No one should make violent threats and hopefully the student will get the help he needs. It was a cry for help given the police investigated and confirmed the child didn’t have access to weapons.
Anonymous
05/31/2022 18:25
Subject: Re:Churchill online threat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone with kids at Churchill keeping their kids home tomorrow?
My kids know several students who are not going in tomorrow.
COVID poses a bigger concern for safety. 127 cases right now at Churchill. That’s a good reason to keep kids home.
I think a good chunk of this number includes seniors who as of today are no longer in school. The senior beach trip took its toll. Lots of students missed prom.
And some went to prom knowing that they had COVID.
So what? If you chose to attend prom you were clearly willing to take the chance of catching Covid, from someone knowingly infected or not.
Anonymous
05/31/2022 18:19
Subject: Churchill online threat
*sticklers for following the rules
Anonymous
05/31/2022 18:17
Subject: Re:Churchill online threat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More than one student has made threats. The administration has not been forthcoming about that.
Then enlighten us here, PP.
In addition to the now widely-circulated message attributed to the special needs student (who may be "harmless" but is a total menace in the hallways with his vulgar and racist outbursts), there are chat messages that name specific students and staff as targets. These were sent by at least one other student. It was alluded to in the first email Taylor sent to parents, but today's message addresses only the situation with the one student.
This is inappropriate speculation about a minor child.
You couldn't PAY me to send my kids to Churchill for many, many reasons, but this kind of speculation and doxing is not okay.
A friend of mine had this happen to her child in a different state, different school district: the child made no threats whatsoever, but other kids accused them of it, the family was doxed and things escalated from there.
Please stop spreading the message to your kids that autistic kids "shoot up schools." I myself have heard that exact quote from more than one student in mcps. It's intrigue, toxic, and terrible.
I mean, that's what MCPS keeps pushing. That mental heath is the underlying cause of all violence in the schools, and counselors and wellness centers will make everything OK. They don't care at all that they are stigmatizing kids with mental health and neuro differences.
This is exactly apot on and I suspect prescient. I can feel a backlash coming against people with mental or developmental differences now that every incident is blamed on "mental health."
In reality, autistic people are stickers for following the rules and have been found to be much LESS likely to commit crimes.
Anonymous
05/31/2022 17:22
Subject: Re:Churchill online threat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone with kids at Churchill keeping their kids home tomorrow?
My kids know several students who are not going in tomorrow.
COVID poses a bigger concern for safety. 127 cases right now at Churchill. That’s a good reason to keep kids home.
I think a good chunk of this number includes seniors who as of today are no longer in school. The senior beach trip took its toll. Lots of students missed prom.
And some went to prom knowing that they had COVID.
Anonymous
05/31/2022 15:26
Subject: Re:Churchill online threat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone with kids at Churchill keeping their kids home tomorrow?
My kids know several students who are not going in tomorrow.
COVID poses a bigger concern for safety. 127 cases right now at Churchill. That’s a good reason to keep kids home.
I think a good chunk of this number includes seniors who as of today are no longer in school. The senior beach trip took its toll. Lots of students missed prom.
Anonymous
05/31/2022 15:21
Subject: Re:Churchill online threat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone with kids at Churchill keeping their kids home tomorrow?
My kids know several students who are not going in tomorrow.
COVID poses a bigger concern for safety. 127 cases right now at Churchill. That’s a good reason to keep kids home.
What's the problem at Churchill?
Anonymous
05/31/2022 15:17
Subject: Re:Churchill online threat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone with kids at Churchill keeping their kids home tomorrow?
My kids know several students who are not going in tomorrow.
COVID poses a bigger concern for safety. 127 cases right now at Churchill. That’s a good reason to keep kids home.
Do you even hear yourself. Go to a covid thread to discuss that