Anonymous wrote:I’ve lived in cities for about 30 years. The proportionate of visible street homeless (differentiating them from other homeless, who usually are less visible and crash with friends, live in cars, etc.) that are very mentally ill seems to have increased dramatically. Is it fentanyl and other synthetic drugs? The other day a man was screaming obscenities st me and an elderly woman because he was trying t give us some rocks and dried up tissues—I couldn’t even understand what he was saying about them but he clearly thought they were something else. Last month, I was walking and turned me head to look at a store window and a man started screaming at me about looking away from him and something about my ass. Last year, a woman out of nowhere ran up and tried to punch me—-but was so out of it that her swing missed me by about a foot and she fell over.
This seems to me way worse than the crack epidemic of the 90s. These people have brains that are just fried. I don’t know that there’s a solution for that. I now avoid the homeless encampment near my office, whereas before I just walked through it with no real worries.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve lived in cities for about 30 years. The proportionate of visible street homeless (differentiating them from other homeless, who usually are less visible and crash with friends, live in cars, etc.) that are very mentally ill seems to have increased dramatically. Is it fentanyl and other synthetic drugs? The other day a man was screaming obscenities st me and an elderly woman because he was trying t give us some rocks and dried up tissues—I couldn’t even understand what he was saying about them but he clearly thought they were something else. Last month, I was walking and turned me head to look at a store window and a man started screaming at me about looking away from him and something about my ass. Last year, a woman out of nowhere ran up and tried to punch me—-but was so out of it that her swing missed me by about a foot and she fell over.
This seems to me way worse than the crack epidemic of the 90s. These people have brains that are just fried. I don’t know that there’s a solution for that. I now avoid the homeless encampment near my office, whereas before I just walked through it with no real worries.
Anonymous wrote:I don't have solutions but am saddened by people and their belongings being swept away by bulldozers and tents thrown into garbage trucks. How does that help?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why DC attracts so many homeless, mentally ill, addicts and criminals?
Mental healthcare person here. I asked this when I started working in the field. It is a combination of huge income disparity in DC plus being the national capital makes the city a focus of a lot of people's mental illness. That said, I think the real criminals are the ones who sit on the Hill and do nothing about widespread public health problems (gun violence). But sure, let's get upset about the vulnerable disenfranchised!
You're not wrong, but the criminals who collect handsome salaries on the Hill aren't pushing me off my bike into traffic, yelling sexual slurs, or sh!tt!ng on the sidewalk, so that helps.
There are ways other than calling the gestapo. For example, a port-o-potty by an encampment isn't perfect, but reduces sidewalk poop by a lot. Make it a regularly cleaned port-o-potty and it's even more effective.
"We haven't tried anything and we're all out of ideas!"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's really not that hard. Prosecute crime, prosecute vagrancy, prosecute open-air drug use. Make it clear that DC is not a free-for-all.
Ha! In other words, for DC it is not possible.
I'd like to start prosecuting in-home drug use. Let's lock them up and take their homes.
Again, caffeine is a drug. Get em.
If you like your D.C. crime, homelessness, and mental health crises, you can keep them.
Just continue right on the way DC is headed. Do nothing.
Great plan dude!![]()
"We haven't tried anything and we're all out of ideas!"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's really not that hard. Prosecute crime, prosecute vagrancy, prosecute open-air drug use. Make it clear that DC is not a free-for-all.
Ha! In other words, for DC it is not possible.
I'd like to start prosecuting in-home drug use. Let's lock them up and take their homes.
Again, caffeine is a drug. Get em.
Anonymous wrote:I disagree that Bowser has done a good job. Dumping the mentally ill into studio apartments with absolutely no case management services benefits no one except the landlords charging the city exhorbitant rents. There is a whole stretch of buildings along Connecticut Avenue---many of which contain fixed income populations---who are experiencing the negative externalities of this ill-considered policy. Drug dealing, fires, criminal behavior---mental illness and substance abuse leading to homelessness are more often than not linked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why DC attracts so many homeless, mentally ill, addicts and criminals?
Mental healthcare person here. I asked this when I started working in the field. It is a combination of huge income disparity in DC plus being the national capital makes the city a focus of a lot of people's mental illness. That said, I think the real criminals are the ones who sit on the Hill and do nothing about widespread public health problems (gun violence). But sure, let's get upset about the vulnerable disenfranchised!
You're not wrong, but the criminals who collect handsome salaries on the Hill aren't pushing me off my bike into traffic, yelling sexual slurs, or sh!tt!ng on the sidewalk, so that helps.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's really not that hard. Prosecute crime, prosecute vagrancy, prosecute open-air drug use. Make it clear that DC is not a free-for-all.
Ha! In other words, for DC it is not possible.
Anonymous wrote:It's really not that hard. Prosecute crime, prosecute vagrancy, prosecute open-air drug use. Make it clear that DC is not a free-for-all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We'd have to return to the model of involuntary institutionalization, OP.
Yup. There’s no way to eliminate homelessness without infringing on people’s civil rights. Many absolutely refuse help.
Yes. And I find it fascinating that it hasn't happened yet. Considering how distressed people are about the situation, and the fact that apparently there is plenty of appetite for reducing individual rights [abortion] I'm baffled why the pendulum hasn't swung back.