Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I clicked, I LOLed. 8/10, would click and LOL again.
What's so "LOL" about it? You may not like it, and it's not my taste either, but the house itself is large, and functional with some very nice touches inside. Again I wouldn't buy it, but it's not a "funny" house or a "funny" listing.
Anonymous wrote:Oh my. One of my rules is that I can't come home and hate how my home looks from the outside. I want to have pride in my home, not be embarrassed by it.
Anonymous wrote:People, what’s the deal with this house? My wife and I have been looking in a few places, including DTSS, and saw this house pop up a few weeks ago. It’s way too big for us and the front elevation is not attractive, but there is a lot to like about the interior and the outdoor space. I would be embarrassed to tell people I live in this house but also it’s magnificent. You’re telling me there’s no one who will pay $1.35 million for this thing?
https://www.redfin.com/MD/Silver-Spring/408-Thayer-Pl-20910/home/11108350
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The neighborhood has all types of houses. Nothing wrong with that. But you’d be the baronial (McMansion) estate in the middle of lower middle class folks. Some would be uncomfortable being that owner.
I didn’t realize people in $800k homes are lower middle class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's houses like this...in times like this...for which I grieve over the wasted labor and materials that went into creating an abomination.
why? the "labor" was paid for their skills and service.
Because the supply of labor is finite. And wasted on erecting this monstrosity
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's houses like this...in times like this...for which I grieve over the wasted labor and materials that went into creating an abomination.
why? the "labor" was paid for their skills and service.
Anonymous wrote:It's houses like this...in times like this...for which I grieve over the wasted labor and materials that went into creating an abomination.