Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Severance has nothing to do with length of employment! It’s to help the employee bridge the time between termination and a new job. I would think two weeks is the minimum.
Severance actually has everything to do with the length of employment. And there is no right to it unless agreed upon between the employer and employee.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If if were just not a good fit I would pay for 2 weeks. If she’s doing something negligent or dangerous, or lied about something to get the job I wouldn’t give anything.
This. I have fired two nannies. One lied about her experience (or the agency did), the other was lying about where she was taking my child and how long she was leaving him crying in his crib. I gave neither severance and fired them on the spot. Never left them alone with my child again.
Anonymous wrote:If if were just not a good fit I would pay for 2 weeks. If she’s doing something negligent or dangerous, or lied about something to get the job I wouldn’t give anything.
Anonymous wrote:I would not pay severance after three weeks.
Anonymous wrote:Severance has nothing to do with length of employment! It’s to help the employee bridge the time between termination and a new job. I would think two weeks is the minimum.
Anonymous wrote:When we hired a nanny we spelled out in the contract that the first three months are a trial period and either party can leave with no notice, and during the trial period if the employer decides not to continue offering employment no severance or notice is owed, and no benefits are accumulated or paid out (so no vacation is accrued).