Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ya done effed up WFH y'all.. low productivity and all around whinging has caused WFH to become another pandemic legend
I started a 100% remote job in late November. I already won two awards and got promoted.
So please tell me again about how my productivity is low?
If you got two “awards” since November: peak Millennial
![]()
Now if you talked about what you accomplished, I would be interested
Anonymous wrote:What is SM/AD?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ya done effed up WFH y'all.. low productivity and all around whinging has caused WFH to become another pandemic legend
I started a 100% remote job in late November. I already won two awards and got promoted.
So please tell me again about how my productivity is low?
If you got two “awards” since November: peak Millennial
![]()
Now if you talked about what you accomplished, I would be interested
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ya done effed up WFH y'all.. low productivity and all around whinging has caused WFH to become another pandemic legend
Not at my company. Other than March 2020, goals were hit and exceeded every month. The bonuses for 2021 were some of the highest issued.
My office is switching to permanent WFH. They are riding out their current lease at our building in Tyson's. Anyone who wants to go to the office can. I've gone twice for meetings and both times there was less than 10 people in the office.
TBH, from an executive standpoint, we get more work and productivity out of employees who WFH. They often start working earlier since there's no commute involved and they work later, too. I get sent the logs every week for the team I manage. I give them a glance but don't scrutinize them. If someone needs to take 2 hours during the day to do life stuff and be away from work, that's fine by me. I don't scrutinize time logged in unless there's a question of productivity. Things have been good thus far.
Anonymous wrote:Ya done effed up WFH y'all.. low productivity and all around whinging has caused WFH to become another pandemic legend
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If there were data that proved that work from home hurt productivity and the office environment, we would have seen it by now, right? But we haven’t. The truth is most people love work from home and make it work for them, but it’s obviously too costly to certain business interests.
This, 100%. I think alot of the older crowd was against WFH pre-pandemic because they just assumed that if you're not in the office, you're not doing any work at all. However, 2+ years is a pretty big sample size to determine that is not true, as if it was, wouldn't companies be failing left and right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If there were data that proved that work from home hurt productivity and the office environment, we would have seen it by now, right? But we haven’t. The truth is most people love work from home and make it work for them, but it’s obviously too costly to certain business interests.
This, 100%. I think alot of the older crowd was against WFH pre-pandemic because they just assumed that if you're not in the office, you're not doing any work at all. However, 2+ years is a pretty big sample size to determine that is not true, as if it was, wouldn't companies be failing left and right?
Anonymous wrote:My companies have policies that differ unit to unit, depending on the responsibilities of particular teams. My team is able to be fully remote and, given the varied locations of my teammates, there would be no point in us going into a location, only to have no teammates there. Other teams really need to be in person. It varies hugely.
Anonymous wrote:If there were data that proved that work from home hurt productivity and the office environment, we would have seen it by now, right? But we haven’t. The truth is most people love work from home and make it work for them, but it’s obviously too costly to certain business interests.
Anonymous wrote:If there were data that proved that work from home hurt productivity and the office environment, we would have seen it by now, right? But we haven’t. The truth is most people love work from home and make it work for them, but it’s obviously too costly to certain business interests.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll preface this with I’m a millennial and mother of 1 toddler at the SM/AD level. I’ve been interviewing with several companies at the F500 level and a few small shops. Based off the conversations I have had and the things i see here and linked in, more and more companies are being strong armed into accepting remote workers. (Anecdotally) This is in direct contrast to my experiences over the last couple of months interviewing and networking. It seems companies are telling people they’ve adopted hybrid models but still expect about 50+% work from office OR fully in office.
Is this ‘everyone will wfh’ banter being blown out of proportion? Am I self-selecting to companies who are more likely to expect office work? Trying to understand because I’ve loved being able to do more than ‘water cooler’ talks during downtimes at work
Aka I like doing my chores, gym workouts, etc on company time.
Everyone will not WFH. A larger portion of the populous will work from home more often than they did pre-pandemic. Private companies have more leeway on their policies because there are no shareholders to report to at the end of each quarter. As profits drop, more companies will call employees back to the office.
Many companies are hybrid in that they allow partial WFH arrangements, mostly just to keep the employees happy, not really because it's what is best for the business.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ya done effed up WFH y'all.. low productivity and all around whinging has caused WFH to become another pandemic legend
I started a 100% remote job in late November. I already won two awards and got promoted.
So please tell me again about how my productivity is low?