Anonymous wrote:David Foster Wallace preferred teaching at Illinois State University to Pomona, where he went after being offered an endowed faculty Chair
What do you expect them to say? "These kids are lazy underachievers, very few actually read the assigned material, plagiarism is rampant, and lectures are like talking to a wall."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's a "directional university"?
Also, no. My friends who are professors are frustrated by ignorant students who don't try hard and administrators who impose pointless requirements to justify their existence, but you both of those anywhere.
East Carolina University, Central Michigan University etc
Lol, northwestern
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's a "directional university"?
Also, no. My friends who are professors are frustrated by ignorant students who don't try hard and administrators who impose pointless requirements to justify their existence, but you both of those anywhere.
East Carolina University, Central Michigan University etc
Anonymous wrote:I concur with the sentiments above. I have had terrific experiences teaching adult students -- including those who may have served several years in the military before going to college. It's great to teach people who have real world experience because they ask better questions and question some of what they're learning and what they're being asked to assume. I also really like teaching people who are paying their own tuition -- because they tend to take the whole educational experience much more seriously.
I taught at a top tier university and the top student I encountered was an older guy who had transferred in from a community college. (See above). The elitism and disdain in the original question are laughable, quite frankly. I've seen people who started out at community colleges go on to win Rhodes scholarships, Fulbright awards, etc. There are decent, hard working smart people in all sorts of unlikely places, it's a joy to teach recent immigrants in particular, and often people who don't get everything handed to them have a much better work ethic. (They are also much less likely to have their parents "proofreading" -- er, writing -- their term papers; managing their semester's tasks because of their 'diagnosis' of executive skills deficits, and they are also much less likely to have to bring an emotional support animal to class.)
Anonymous wrote:I’m aware that the academic job market is really competitive, and thus people with PhDs from top schools can end up teaching at regional colleges. I imagine that it must be frustrating to teach those students. I looked on the website of a directional university and the faculty have PhDs from Harvard, Yale and other schools that are much, much higher ranked for grad and undergrad than that school.