Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doctoral admissions sound crazy to me. So if a student gets a high GPA in a STEM degree but couldn’t get research experience at their school, that’s it?
That scenario is relatively fixable, just get a research job upon graduation, to fill the gap.
My kid is being told "she did everything right," but they just don't have funding. (Some programs are accepting NO new students this year...which they should figure out before the had people apply, IMHO).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one should go into a PhD program that isn't fully funded (tuition waiver plus a livable stipend). And no one gets into a fully funded PhD program unless they have an advisor or faculty member advocate for them. It's the undergraduate faculty that will open the doors for them. My advisor got me a slot based solely on the weight of his recommendation before the grad program ever saw my transcript or GREs.
So you have to go to a top school? Seems much different than med or law admissions.
The PP never said this.
She said “undergraduate faculty that will open doors.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one should go into a PhD program that isn't fully funded (tuition waiver plus a livable stipend). And no one gets into a fully funded PhD program unless they have an advisor or faculty member advocate for them. It's the undergraduate faculty that will open the doors for them. My advisor got me a slot based solely on the weight of his recommendation before the grad program ever saw my transcript or GREs.
So you have to go to a top school? Seems much different than med or law admissions.
The PP never said this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one should go into a PhD program that isn't fully funded (tuition waiver plus a livable stipend). And no one gets into a fully funded PhD program unless they have an advisor or faculty member advocate for them. It's the undergraduate faculty that will open the doors for them. My advisor got me a slot based solely on the weight of his recommendation before the grad program ever saw my transcript or GREs.
So you have to go to a top school? Seems much different than med or law admissions.
Anonymous wrote:No one should go into a PhD program that isn't fully funded (tuition waiver plus a livable stipend). And no one gets into a fully funded PhD program unless they have an advisor or faculty member advocate for them. It's the undergraduate faculty that will open the doors for them. My advisor got me a slot based solely on the weight of his recommendation before the grad program ever saw my transcript or GREs.
Anonymous wrote:No one should go into a PhD program that isn't fully funded (tuition waiver plus a livable stipend). And no one gets into a fully funded PhD program unless they have an advisor or faculty member advocate for them. It's the undergraduate faculty that will open the doors for them. My advisor got me a slot based solely on the weight of his recommendation before the grad program ever saw my transcript or GREs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know someone who applied again the next year and had much better results. No extra job experience inbetween or classes. Said they changed nothing about their application.
Since there are so few slots, it seems like timing is key (and maybe luck). That is assuming of course that you have the basic ingredients all schools seek.
Anonymous wrote:Doctoral admissions sound crazy to me. So if a student gets a high GPA in a STEM degree but couldn’t get research experience at their school, that’s it?[/quote
Not necessarily from what I gather, but probably not to top programs unless they can get a lab tech position and maybe get invited that way. DD has all the goods so to speak and I still worry that this will be a costly mistake unless she decides to go corporate after it and not work in academia - which sounds beyond hopeless at this point.