Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are these legal battles the best use of fcps tax dollars? Maybe if they spent more money on other aap programs people wouldn’t need to clamor so hard to get into the scarce resource that’s TJ
Just get rid of all race on apps
TJ doesn’t have race on the app.
Disparate impact is a recognized legal theory.
Interesting. So if certain races have much lower acceptance rates & enrollment #s than others is that a disparate impact?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are these legal battles the best use of fcps tax dollars? Maybe if they spent more money on other aap programs people wouldn’t need to clamor so hard to get into the scarce resource that’s TJ
Just get rid of all race on apps
TJ doesn’t have race on the app.
Disparate impact is a recognized legal theory.
Actually, conservatives have been doing their best for quite a while to make sure it's not. Will be funny (not really, just another in the long run of hyper-hypocritical decisions) if they rely on a disparate impact theory to invalidate school policies. Fortunately, Fairfax is wealthy enough to hire good enough lawyers to achieve their policy goals without making it so obvious in the future. (You know, like the GOP tries to do with all tis gerrymandering.)
Anonymous wrote:Justice Roberts very recently criticized how the "conservatives" are using the shadow docket. And has sided with the liberals 7/9 times recently on 5-4 decisions. Does this mean he is likely to not grant the coalition the stay they are seeking? Or if he refers it to the full court to vote, perhaps will side with the liberals as well? Does anyone know Barretts and Kavanaugh's stance on affirmative action?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does this not portend that, one way or the other, the racially motivated change in the TJ admission policy is eventually going to be invalidated by the Supreme Court? It’s a conservative court and, while Roberts sometimes sides with the liberals, the fact that he got the matter on the “shadow docket” seems to suggest he has some sympathy for the plaintiffs.
The fact that he got the stay application is just a reflection that he is assigned to applications from the 4th circuit.
The fact that he asked for a response is an indication that someone on the court is taking the application seriously but doesn’t necessarily indicate which way they will break on the stay.
However, most of these (99%?) emergency applications are rejected summarily so the fact that this case (vacating stay) is going to be reviewed is a sign.
The partisan hacks the GOP has appointed to the court love this kind of thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are these legal battles the best use of fcps tax dollars? Maybe if they spent more money on other aap programs people wouldn’t need to clamor so hard to get into the scarce resource that’s TJ
Just get rid of all race on apps
TJ doesn’t have race on the app.
Disparate impact is a recognized legal theory.
Anonymous wrote:Justice Roberts very recently criticized how the "conservatives" are using the shadow docket. And has sided with the liberals 7/9 times recently on 5-4 decisions. Does this mean he is likely to not grant the coalition the stay they are seeking? Or if he refers it to the full court to vote, perhaps will side with the liberals as well? Does anyone know Barretts and Kavanaugh's stance on affirmative action?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are these legal battles the best use of fcps tax dollars? Maybe if they spent more money on other aap programs people wouldn’t need to clamor so hard to get into the scarce resource that’s TJ
Just get rid of all race on apps
TJ doesn’t have race on the app.
Disparate impact is a recognized legal theory.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's well known that Roberts takes a dim view on Affirmative Action and other systemic racist policies. He famously said "“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race."
It's no great surprise, therefore, that Roberts was responsive to this emergency application.
As stated previously, the rushed and not well thought out changes to TJ's admission system rolled out by the school board of FCPS may lead to permanent end of all affirmative action plans in public K to 12 schools in the entire country. All thanks to school board members who acted immaturely and opportunistically without any regard to Asian American community.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are these legal battles the best use of fcps tax dollars? Maybe if they spent more money on other aap programs people wouldn’t need to clamor so hard to get into the scarce resource that’s TJ
Just get rid of all race on apps
TJ doesn’t have race on the app.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's well known that Roberts takes a dim view on Affirmative Action and other systemic racist policies. He famously said "“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race."
It's no great surprise, therefore, that Roberts was responsive to this emergency application.
As stated previously, the rushed and not well thought out changes to TJ's admission system rolled out by the school board of FCPS may lead to permanent end of all affirmative action plans in public K to 12 schools in the entire country. All thanks to school board members who acted immaturely and opportunistically without any regard to Asian American community.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are these legal battles the best use of fcps tax dollars? Maybe if they spent more money on other aap programs people wouldn’t need to clamor so hard to get into the scarce resource that’s TJ
Just get rid of all race on apps
TJ doesn’t have race on the app.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are these legal battles the best use of fcps tax dollars? Maybe if they spent more money on other aap programs people wouldn’t need to clamor so hard to get into the scarce resource that’s TJ
Just get rid of all race on apps
TJ doesn’t have race on the app.
I think PP meant block out all information that would indicate race of the applicant such as name, school name etc.