Anonymous wrote:I live in a different district that already had spring break. The cases in schools doubled the week back from break. My own family traveled, ate in restaurants, and went to see a Broadway show. We all tested multiple times before going back to school and work because we knew our possibility for exposure was high. All negative, though my kids both ended up with a short duration minor cold. Covid is much more transmissible than flu and with masks gone Id hate to be the one causing my kids whole class to get sick.
Anonymous wrote:The commentary by OP is weakened by OP’s comparisons.
School is not like other activities in society. School is not optional. Schools are entrusted with the health and safety of kids. Movie theaters are not.
In the past schools did not test for flu. If they had the ability, they should have. It is not okay to have sick people infecting the healthy.
Wasteful to throw away. Return to the school.
Anonymous wrote:There is no way I’m giving my kids a covid test after break unless they are symptomatic. One of my kids had covid a few weeks ago (no one else caught it), and our school did absolutely nothing to keep them from falling behind while they were out or to catch them up when they came back. Not even the teacher check-in they were supposed to get. Not setting any of the rest up for that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait...they gave you tests and you threw them in the trash? For why?
Because it’s a scam and the fraud used to perpetrate this plandemic.
Disclosure: I put water, orange juice, soda and gasoline. They came out positive. Go figure.
Anonymous wrote:Wait...they gave you tests and you threw them in the trash? For why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm betting that it's more than 80%. I've heard only 20% of kids are opted into surveillance testing (the most extreme of extreme parents).
This isn't living with the virus, this is extreme hypochondria. This is school closures by stealth, considering nowhere else in society tests random people like this, let alone the least at risk segment of the population. I can't imagine how many kids would be shut out of school every flu season for the past 20 years if we asymptomatically tested for flu (which is more deadly to healthy kids than COVID).
We got ours yesterday and it went straight into the circular file.
What is wrong with you?
Profound, profound selfishness.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm betting that it's more than 80%. I've heard only 20% of kids are opted into surveillance testing (the most extreme of extreme parents).
This isn't living with the virus, this is extreme hypochondria. This is school closures by stealth, considering nowhere else in society tests random people like this, let alone the least at risk segment of the population. I can't imagine how many kids would be shut out of school every flu season for the past 20 years if we asymptomatically tested for flu (which is more deadly to healthy kids than COVID).
We got ours yesterday and it went straight into the circular file.
What is wrong with you?
Anonymous wrote:I'm guessing the vast majority of parents stick them in the closet with the other covid tests they've accumulated. That's what we did.
Who would just toss them?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm betting that it's more than 80%. I've heard only 20% of kids are opted into surveillance testing (the most extreme of extreme parents).
This isn't living with the virus, this is extreme hypochondria. This is school closures by stealth, considering nowhere else in society tests random people like this, let alone the least at risk segment of the population. I can't imagine how many kids would be shut out of school every flu season for the past 20 years if we asymptomatically tested for flu (which is more deadly to healthy kids than COVID).
We got ours yesterday and it went straight into the circular file.
What is wrong with you?