Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Plus Covid grade inflation. There are literally entire schools districts (I'm looking at you DCPS) that didn't give grades lower than a B for 2 years.
Let's say the number of kids country-wide with straight As is even up just 10% over a typical year (and it's likely far higher). That's thousands more "top" kids right there.
You can blame public schools all you want.
Anonymous wrote:Plus Covid grade inflation. There are literally entire schools districts (I'm looking at you DCPS) that didn't give grades lower than a B for 2 years.
Let's say the number of kids country-wide with straight As is even up just 10% over a typical year (and it's likely far higher). That's thousands more "top" kids right there.
Anonymous wrote:I think it's hard for some people to fathom the size of some of these applicant pools. And it's also hard to fathom that there are literally thousands of students with amazing programs and top grades in these pools.
We also tend to grasp onto the anecdotes that comfort us after see the numbers. So a college rejects 90% of applicants, but someone's cousin got in with 2 Bs on their transcript, so we tell ourselves our kid has a chance.
Anonymous wrote:Where you unaware of the significant increase in applications since COVID? Did you think TO would have no effect on the applicant pool? Did anyone (e.g., college counselor) discuss yield projection for perceived "safety" schools? Do you consider the math/odds in applying to a school that accepts less than 20% of applicants? Did you discuss any of these issues with your kids before they applied? Or is it something else?
Anonymous wrote:
I understand some families have overly high expectations and would have benefited from more accurate information about current conditions. However you're being downright nasty, OP. Plenty of families have been rejected from their preferred choices (yes, families, it's all right if it's a family thing, and not just the student's thing), and are pretty down.
But perhaps cruelty is the point of your post. In which case... thoughts and prayers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where you unaware of the significant increase in applications since COVID? Did you think TO would have no effect on the applicant pool? Did anyone (e.g., college counselor) discuss yield projection for perceived "safety" schools? Do you consider the math/odds in applying to a school that accepts less than 20% of applicants? Did you discuss any of these issues with your kids before they applied? Or is it something else?
Even the college counselors got it wrong for us -it wasn't just us that were thrown by results (so far) and we are talking experienced high school college counselors and outside paid ones... applied to 23 because of the unknowns in at 6 ...our huge mistake and we knew when it was happening was that we could not get kid to get in ED or EA apps...we tried...hard... but kid would not do it...
OP here: I would expect paid college counselors to be able to read the room. Many of these trends started before COVID and the pandemic just made it worse, but I have a hard time believing it was a surprise for people in the business.
Do you mean private or school counselors as both groups are paid? Some quick thoughts: I think there was even a greater retrenchment than last year - @ DCs' school, kids with similar profiles to successful kids from last year not getting in to the same schools on ED1. I know there are a couple where the school counseling office still doesn't get what happened. Second, I think some parents still didn't quite grasp the tumult from last year. They knew there had been changes but they couldn't quite figure out how to tweak accordingly for their kid. If ED1 didn't work at a school with a 9% admit rate, then ED2 may not necessarily be successful at a similar school with 13%. Maybe it would've been better to go ED2 @ a 20+ school especially if your DC wants to be in a particular region of country.
I don't think this was necessarily a surprise for most people in the business, though the speed of it may be. Also, parents can be contradictory: they think their kid deserves a reach, the counselor disagrees but supports the parents/kid decision, then the kid gets rejected and the parents demand to know why the counselor allowed them to do that. I've seen/heard that a lot over the last few months.
For the earlier PP, sorry that your DC was not up for the ED/EA. Our one DC in cycle this time did not necessarily listen to much, but nailed that and it was a huge help. Submitted 6 EAs with the ED. Got into 2 EAs before finding out about the ED. Got lucky with ED, but the EAs really lowered the pressure for those few weeks before hearing about the ED. GL to your DC!
Thanks for the explanation. Yes, they both are paid, lol. I was referring to college counselors that people pay to work with, not school-based counselors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where you unaware of the significant increase in applications since COVID? Did you think TO would have no effect on the applicant pool? Did anyone (e.g., college counselor) discuss yield projection for perceived "safety" schools? Do you consider the math/odds in applying to a school that accepts less than 20% of applicants? Did you discuss any of these issues with your kids before they applied? Or is it something else?
DC has options, so we don't totally fit in this category. Turns out DC got into a reach school, less than 30% acceptance rate with profile in the bottom 25%. Did not go test optional. But, I was VERY suprised he didn't get into a "safety" school that has a 70% admit rate and DC being in the top 75% of their range. It was the school DC planned to attend. Thankfully, he just got lucky on a reach he had out there.
We were surprised! We didn't have any warning from anyone that things were so different this year. I'm still not sure I understand this year even after going through it.
Happy to hear your kid has optioned and got into his reach school. Did the safety school get significantly more applications than last year?
Honestly, I'm not sure. I would assume they did. After he was denied, we didn't look for reasons. The GC told us it was a "safety" and DS wanted to go there. He still feels a little sad about it. It really was his top choice. The reach was done at the last minute, because he felt like he was supposed to have a reach. In our house, we started calling admissions a lottery. You have to have the grades to play, but after that it felt like a lottery.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where you unaware of the significant increase in applications since COVID? Did you think TO would have no effect on the applicant pool? Did anyone (e.g., college counselor) discuss yield projection for perceived "safety" schools? Do you consider the math/odds in applying to a school that accepts less than 20% of applicants? Did you discuss any of these issues with your kids before they applied? Or is it something else?
Even the college counselors got it wrong for us -it wasn't just us that were thrown by results (so far) and we are talking experienced high school college counselors and outside paid ones... applied to 23 because of the unknowns in at 6 ...our huge mistake and we knew when it was happening was that we could not get kid to get in ED or EA apps...we tried...hard... but kid would not do it...
OP here: I would expect paid college counselors to be able to read the room. Many of these trends started before COVID and the pandemic just made it worse, but I have a hard time believing it was a surprise for people in the business.
My son is a junior at Walter Johnson high school, a well-regarded local public. You wouldn't believe the idiocies spouted by his counselor. Busy students and parents might be heartened by such insane advice, and not go looking for other suggestions. In which case they might be disappointed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where you unaware of the significant increase in applications since COVID? Did you think TO would have no effect on the applicant pool? Did anyone (e.g., college counselor) discuss yield projection for perceived "safety" schools? Do you consider the math/odds in applying to a school that accepts less than 20% of applicants? Did you discuss any of these issues with your kids before they applied? Or is it something else?
Even the college counselors got it wrong for us -it wasn't just us that were thrown by results (so far) and we are talking experienced high school college counselors and outside paid ones... applied to 23 because of the unknowns in at 6 ...our huge mistake and we knew when it was happening was that we could not get kid to get in ED or EA apps...we tried...hard... but kid would not do it...
OP here: I would expect paid college counselors to be able to read the room. Many of these trends started before COVID and the pandemic just made it worse, but I have a hard time believing it was a surprise for people in the business.
Do you mean private or school counselors as both groups are paid? Some quick thoughts: I think there was even a greater retrenchment than last year - @ DCs' school, kids with similar profiles to successful kids from last year not getting in to the same schools on ED1. I know there are a couple where the school counseling office still doesn't get what happened. Second, I think some parents still didn't quite grasp the tumult from last year. They knew there had been changes but they couldn't quite figure out how to tweak accordingly for their kid. If ED1 didn't work at a school with a 9% admit rate, then ED2 may not necessarily be successful at a similar school with 13%. Maybe it would've been better to go ED2 @ a 20+ school especially if your DC wants to be in a particular region of country.
I don't think this was necessarily a surprise for most people in the business, though the speed of it may be. Also, parents can be contradictory: they think their kid deserves a reach, the counselor disagrees but supports the parents/kid decision, then the kid gets rejected and the parents demand to know why the counselor allowed them to do that. I've seen/heard that a lot over the last few months.
For the earlier PP, sorry that your DC was not up for the ED/EA. Our one DC in cycle this time did not necessarily listen to much, but nailed that and it was a huge help. Submitted 6 EAs with the ED. Got into 2 EAs before finding out about the ED. Got lucky with ED, but the EAs really lowered the pressure for those few weeks before hearing about the ED. GL to your DC!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where you unaware of the significant increase in applications since COVID? Did you think TO would have no effect on the applicant pool? Did anyone (e.g., college counselor) discuss yield projection for perceived "safety" schools? Do you consider the math/odds in applying to a school that accepts less than 20% of applicants? Did you discuss any of these issues with your kids before they applied? Or is it something else?
Even the college counselors got it wrong for us -it wasn't just us that were thrown by results (so far) and we are talking experienced high school college counselors and outside paid ones... applied to 23 because of the unknowns in at 6 ...our huge mistake and we knew when it was happening was that we could not get kid to get in ED or EA apps...we tried...hard... but kid would not do it...
OP here: I would expect paid college counselors to be able to read the room. Many of these trends started before COVID and the pandemic just made it worse, but I have a hard time believing it was a surprise for people in the business.
My son is a junior at Walter Johnson high school, a well-regarded local public. You wouldn't believe the idiocies spouted by his counselor. Busy students and parents might be heartened by such insane advice, and not go looking for other suggestions. In which case they might be disappointed.
Anonymous wrote:
I understand some families have overly high expectations and would have benefited from more accurate information about current conditions. However you're being downright nasty, OP. Plenty of families have been rejected from their preferred choices (yes, families, it's all right if it's a family thing, and not just the student's thing), and are pretty down.
But perhaps cruelty is the point of your post. In which case... thoughts and prayers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where you unaware of the significant increase in applications since COVID? Did you think TO would have no effect on the applicant pool? Did anyone (e.g., college counselor) discuss yield projection for perceived "safety" schools? Do you consider the math/odds in applying to a school that accepts less than 20% of applicants? Did you discuss any of these issues with your kids before they applied? Or is it something else?
DC has options, so we don't totally fit in this category. Turns out DC got into a reach school, less than 30% acceptance rate with profile in the bottom 25%. Did not go test optional. But, I was VERY suprised he didn't get into a "safety" school that has a 70% admit rate and DC being in the top 75% of their range. It was the school DC planned to attend. Thankfully, he just got lucky on a reach he had out there.
We were surprised! We didn't have any warning from anyone that things were so different this year. I'm still not sure I understand this year even after going through it.
Happy to hear your kid has optioned and got into his reach school. Did the safety school get significantly more applications than last year?
Anonymous wrote:Where you unaware of the significant increase in applications since COVID? Did you think TO would have no effect on the applicant pool? Did anyone (e.g., college counselor) discuss yield projection for perceived "safety" schools? Do you consider the math/odds in applying to a school that accepts less than 20% of applicants? Did you discuss any of these issues with your kids before they applied? Or is it something else?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where you unaware of the significant increase in applications since COVID? Did you think TO would have no effect on the applicant pool? Did anyone (e.g., college counselor) discuss yield projection for perceived "safety" schools? Do you consider the math/odds in applying to a school that accepts less than 20% of applicants? Did you discuss any of these issues with your kids before they applied? Or is it something else?
Even the college counselors got it wrong for us -it wasn't just us that were thrown by results (so far) and we are talking experienced high school college counselors and outside paid ones... applied to 23 because of the unknowns in at 6 ...our huge mistake and we knew when it was happening was that we could not get kid to get in ED or EA apps...we tried...hard... but kid would not do it...
OP here: I would expect paid college counselors to be able to read the room. Many of these trends started before COVID and the pandemic just made it worse, but I have a hard time believing it was a surprise for people in the business.
Anonymous wrote:The thought process that you ‘need’ to attend a selective school to be successful is wrong to begin with. Thats where all the stress and anxiety comes from. It’s unbelievable how seemingly educated people here think the name and selectivity of a school determine success and happiness is completely flawed. Every high stats kid thinks that they deserve to go to a selective school otherwise their high school years were a waste. Thats flawed thinking. Thats a source of stress. Just because you have high stats doesn’t mean you get into a selective school. Fix your expectations