Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one decent is going to run for SB or want to be Superintendent given the current climate. Just look at this week’s SB meeting. A frothing lunatic got up and opened her remarks by calling the school board members “Groomers” and went on to rant about communism and NAMBLA. It’s nothing but abuse and harassment. And these anti-Vaxx qQnon nuts are getting scarier and scarier.
+1
-1.
You can ridicule a parent but at most it’s a distraction. She’s not the one who prompted the parents of over 10,000 kids to pull them out of FCPS. That’s on Brabrand and the current School Board.
Do you think better candidates for SB and the superintendent position will come forward?
Anonymous wrote:No one decent is going to run for SB or want to be Superintendent given the current climate. Just look at this week’s SB meeting. A frothing lunatic got up and opened her remarks by calling the school board members “Groomers” and went on to rant about communism and NAMBLA. It’s nothing but abuse and harassment. And these anti-Vaxx qQnon nuts are getting scarier and scarier.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one decent is going to run for SB or want to be Superintendent given the current climate. Just look at this week’s SB meeting. A frothing lunatic got up and opened her remarks by calling the school board members “Groomers” and went on to rant about communism and NAMBLA. It’s nothing but abuse and harassment. And these anti-Vaxx qQnon nuts are getting scarier and scarier.
+1
-1.
You can ridicule a parent but at most it’s a distraction. She’s not the one who prompted the parents of over 10,000 kids to pull them out of FCPS. That’s on Brabrand and the current School Board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one decent is going to run for SB or want to be Superintendent given the current climate. Just look at this week’s SB meeting. A frothing lunatic got up and opened her remarks by calling the school board members “Groomers” and went on to rant about communism and NAMBLA. It’s nothing but abuse and harassment. And these anti-Vaxx qQnon nuts are getting scarier and scarier.
+1
Anonymous wrote:No one decent is going to run for SB or want to be Superintendent given the current climate. Just look at this week’s SB meeting. A frothing lunatic got up and opened her remarks by calling the school board members “Groomers” and went on to rant about communism and NAMBLA. It’s nothing but abuse and harassment. And these anti-Vaxx qQnon nuts are getting scarier and scarier.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Best to my knowledge, the entire public has been shut out from the process in the last couple of months. Anyone have any inside tips? Really hoping we get better than the Braindead Brabrand.
Why would you think that? Look at who is doing the hiring - the most corrupt, incompetent School Board in FCPS history.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The priorities of the current School Board over the past 2+ years have been such an odd mix:
1. Dragging their heels when it came to getting kids back into buildings, leading to over 10,000 FCPS students exiting the system within two years
2. Prioritizing admissions changes at TJHSST in order to reduce the percentage of Asian kids
3. Keeping uber-wealthy Langley free of economic diversity
4. Ignoring struggling IB programs (only 3% of Mount Vernon seniors getting IB diplomas) but spending money on a new "Leadership" academy at IB Lewis
5. Spending money on building additions while nearby poorer schools remain under-enrolled or more overcrowded schools get ignored
6 Converting Dunn Loring administrative building back into an elementary school when it isn't needed, in order to save a dog park in Oakton
7. Litigating with the Youngkin administrative over "local control" at every opportunity
No talented school administrator would want to step into this morass and immediately be asked to fix the damage these folks have been doing. The School Board's entire philosophy seems to be to want to soil the nest so much that no one else will want to get involved.
+1. And the real funny thing is that the issues with numbers 3, 4, 5, and 6, and even 2 to some extent, could have been addressed all at once if they finally went through with that big county-wide boundary study and adjustment that has been talked about in the past, but keeps getting pushed off.
Anonymous wrote:The priorities of the current School Board over the past 2+ years have been such an odd mix:
1. Dragging their heels when it came to getting kids back into buildings, leading to over 10,000 FCPS students exiting the system within two years
2. Prioritizing admissions changes at TJHSST in order to reduce the percentage of Asian kids
3. Keeping uber-wealthy Langley free of economic diversity
4. Ignoring struggling IB programs (only 3% of Mount Vernon seniors getting IB diplomas) but spending money on a new "Leadership" academy at IB Lewis
5. Spending money on building additions while nearby poorer schools remain under-enrolled or more overcrowded schools get ignored
6 Converting Dunn Loring administrative building back into an elementary school when it isn't needed, in order to save a dog park in Oakton
7. Litigating with the Youngkin administrative over "local control" at every opportunity
No talented school administrator would want to step into this morass and immediately be asked to fix the damage these folks have been doing. The School Board's entire philosophy seems to be to want to soil the nest so much that no one else will want to get involved.
Then, they are most likely to promote from within.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they aren't finding any really good candidates. Like someone else said, the pay is just not good enough to attract a highly qualified employee to oversee such a large school division. I wonder what happened to that survey asking people for nominees?
Then that tells you they need to increase the pay or recommend splitting the Titanic called FCPS into districts that can be managed by candidates with lesz operating skills.
Example - Brabrand may have been equipped to manage a school system as small as Lynchburg City. He was quickly in well over his head in Fairfax.
We’ve had strong superintendents before like Spillane and Domenech but their equivalents won’t come to FCPS if they are going to be hen-pecked by a bunch of third-rate politicians on the School Board.
You think it's the school board they're worried about? No, having a family member who is the Superintendent of a much smaller school district, the thing people are most worried about are the political parents -- on BOTH ends of the spectrum. Everyone is well aware of groups like Fairfax Parents/Open FCPS and equivalents and they don't want to deal with it. School administrators talk, PP. Nobody wants this job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they aren't finding any really good candidates. Like someone else said, the pay is just not good enough to attract a highly qualified employee to oversee such a large school division. I wonder what happened to that survey asking people for nominees?
Then that tells you they need to increase the pay or recommend splitting the Titanic called FCPS into districts that can be managed by candidates with lesz operating skills.
Example - Brabrand may have been equipped to manage a school system as small as Lynchburg City. He was quickly in well over his head in Fairfax.
We’ve had strong superintendents before like Spillane and Domenech but their equivalents won’t come to FCPS if they are going to be hen-pecked by a bunch of third-rate politicians on the School Board.
You think it's the school board they're worried about? No, having a family member who is the Superintendent of a much smaller school district, the thing people are most worried about are the political parents -- on BOTH ends of the spectrum. Everyone is well aware of groups like Fairfax Parents/Open FCPS and equivalents and they don't want to deal with it. School administrators talk, PP. Nobody wants this job.