Anonymous wrote:Because they need to enforce rigid gender roles so that they can continue to rely on free labor from women.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because they need to enforce rigid gender roles so that they can continue to rely on free labor from women.
![]()
Having lived in culturally conservative countries, women were the biggest enforcers of the traditional roles.
Anonymous wrote:Religion. Religion is stupid and offensive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because they need to enforce rigid gender roles so that they can continue to rely on free labor from women.
![]()
Having lived in culturally conservative countries, women were the biggest enforcers of the traditional roles.
Were they educated?
Some are. Quite highly so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because they need to enforce rigid gender roles so that they can continue to rely on free labor from women.
![]()
Having lived in culturally conservative countries, women were the biggest enforcers of the traditional roles.
Were they educated?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because they need to enforce rigid gender roles so that they can continue to rely on free labor from women.
![]()
Having lived in culturally conservative countries, women were the biggest enforcers of the traditional roles.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Being socially conservative (aka repressive & oppressive) is what keeps them developing rather than developed. Places that keep women and minorities and the poor down are inherently anti-intellectual and resistant to modernization in any form. They intentionally lag behind economically as well as culturally. It’s not just a developing country thing - think about Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, much of Appalachia. What is it that holds them back?
Depends on what you consider Appalachia, but globalization is what annihilated parts of Ohio & Pennsylvania.
Anonymous wrote:Being socially conservative (aka repressive & oppressive) is what keeps them developing rather than developed. Places that keep women and minorities and the poor down are inherently anti-intellectual and resistant to modernization in any form. They intentionally lag behind economically as well as culturally. It’s not just a developing country thing - think about Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, much of Appalachia. What is it that holds them back?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The whole world is socially conservative, you racist dipshit, including the United States. You still haven’t figured out that the reason why the Republicans are so successful at “culture wars” is because most people agree with them?
I’m a Democrat for reasons other than social issues, but if I was voting on the definition of “woman,” trans ideology in schools, the kind of family structure that is ideal, and other social issues, then I would be Republican.
I'm not really sure how republicans are successful in culture wars given the social spectrum in our country has consistently moved left since our founding. republicans have lost most culture wars and will probably continue to do so. they've been successful at rolling back abortion rights - but that's because of the courts...not because the American public supports it.
The "whole world" isn't socially conservative at all - the prosperous and democratic west isn't. Right wingers ended up perennially fighting a losing battle post-WWII when education levels in the west started to curb upwards...the secularism that predictably started to increase as people became more educated just fuelled it. High levels of educational attainment (and the attendant increase in secularism) are obviously inconsistent with social conservatism. A big reason why right wingers want to keep people dumb and uber religious.
as far as things like the "definition of women" and "trans ideology" - these are not issues that occupy the minds of most working Americans. They're mainly the obsession of the Very Online and Cable News Addicted.
Oh, honey childignorance reeks through every sentence of your post.
I suggest you spend a few years living in the real world, aka not the little two block bubble you live in.
FYI most of the progressive victories in the US were through the courts, not social acceptance. Which is one reason why the abortion rights roll backs haven't generated as much controversy or anger as you'd expect. And things like transgender and the biological meaning of women are not exactly being ignored either.
The progressives are extremely ideological, so they fail to notice how much of what they believe in is little more than religious fantasies in different forms and why it's so divisive and unpalatable. So it's a bit hypocritical to see them lecture at socially conservative religious nations, when they're just as religious themselves, just in different ways.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The whole world is socially conservative, you racist dipshit, including the United States. You still haven’t figured out that the reason why the Republicans are so successful at “culture wars” is because most people agree with them?
I’m a Democrat for reasons other than social issues, but if I was voting on the definition of “woman,” trans ideology in schools, the kind of family structure that is ideal, and other social issues, then I would be Republican.
I'm not really sure how republicans are successful in culture wars given the social spectrum in our country has consistently moved left since our founding. republicans have lost most culture wars and will probably continue to do so. they've been successful at rolling back abortion rights - but that's because of the courts...not because the American public supports it.
The "whole world" isn't socially conservative at all - the prosperous and democratic west isn't. Right wingers ended up perennially fighting a losing battle post-WWII when education levels in the west started to curb upwards...the secularism that predictably started to increase as people became more educated just fuelled it. High levels of educational attainment (and the attendant increase in secularism) are obviously inconsistent with social conservatism. A big reason why right wingers want to keep people dumb and uber religious.
as far as things like the "definition of women" and "trans ideology" - these are not issues that occupy the minds of most working Americans. They're mainly the obsession of the Very Online and Cable News Addicted.
+1
Oh, honey childignorance reeks through every sentence of your post.
I suggest you spend a few years living in the real world, aka not the little two block bubble you live in.
FYI most of the progressive victories in the US were through the courts, not social acceptance. Which is one reason why the abortion rights roll backs haven't generated as much controversy or anger as you'd expect. And things like transgender and the biological meaning of women are not exactly being ignored either.
The progressives are extremely ideological, so they fail to notice how much of what they believe in is little more than religious fantasies in different forms and why it's so divisive and unpalatable. So it's a bit hypocritical to see them lecture at socially conservative religious nations, when they're just as religious themselves, just in different ways.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The whole world is socially conservative, you racist dipshit, including the United States. You still haven’t figured out that the reason why the Republicans are so successful at “culture wars” is because most people agree with them?
I’m a Democrat for reasons other than social issues, but if I was voting on the definition of “woman,” trans ideology in schools, the kind of family structure that is ideal, and other social issues, then I would be Republican.
I'm not really sure how republicans are successful in culture wars given the social spectrum in our country has consistently moved left since our founding. republicans have lost most culture wars and will probably continue to do so. they've been successful at rolling back abortion rights - but that's because of the courts...not because the American public supports it.
The "whole world" isn't socially conservative at all - the prosperous and democratic west isn't. Right wingers ended up perennially fighting a losing battle post-WWII when education levels in the west started to curb upwards...the secularism that predictably started to increase as people became more educated just fuelled it. High levels of educational attainment (and the attendant increase in secularism) are obviously inconsistent with social conservatism. A big reason why right wingers want to keep people dumb and uber religious.
as far as things like the "definition of women" and "trans ideology" - these are not issues that occupy the minds of most working Americans. They're mainly the obsession of the Very Online and Cable News Addicted.
ignorance reeks through every sentence of your post.
Anonymous wrote:The whole world is socially conservative, you racist dipshit, including the United States. You still haven’t figured out that the reason why the Republicans are so successful at “culture wars” is because most people agree with them?
I’m a Democrat for reasons other than social issues, but if I was voting on the definition of “woman,” trans ideology in schools, the kind of family structure that is ideal, and other social issues, then I would be Republican.