Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know the family and have seen the email. It involves a former student and teacher at Forestville Elementary who were there then (2002) and the teacher is now at Franklin Sherman Elementary School. After intensive therapy, the victim was brave enough to come forward in December 2021. The police thought it was credible enough to obtain a warrant, search the teacher's house, and interview him. They did not find anything and he denied the allegations. This is not surprising if it happened 20 years ago and the teacher has any sense of self-preservation. The police lost interest due to a lack of evidence and FCPS did nothing. The victim was frustrated that he was not taken seriously and that the teacher was allowed to continue to have access to young children. He sent the email this week to some parents and FCPS administration (3/20/22). FCPS pressured the police to close the case, which they did on Monday (3/20/22!) without further investigation. I am 100% sure the allegations are true. The victim, understandably, wants to hold the teacher accountable and ensure he is not able to do the same to others. The teacher should not be around children. PLEASE PRESSURE FCPS TO DO THE RIGHT THING AND GET THE GUY OUT OF SCHOOLS!
If the case has been closed by the police, there is literally no basis for removing the teacher. Irrespective of whether the allegations are true -- and I have no idea if they are or are not -- it sets the absolute wrong standard to suspend or terminate someone based on claims that have been investigated and found not to warrant charges. If more evidence is developed or discovered in the future, then action can be taken. But you cannot and should not punish someone based solely on an allegation.
Anonymous wrote:I know the family and have seen the email. It involves a former student and teacher at Forestville Elementary who were there then (2002) and the teacher is now at Franklin Sherman Elementary School. After intensive therapy, the victim was brave enough to come forward in December 2021. The police thought it was credible enough to obtain a warrant, search the teacher's house, and interview him. They did not find anything and he denied the allegations. This is not surprising if it happened 20 years ago and the teacher has any sense of self-preservation. The police lost interest due to a lack of evidence and FCPS did nothing. The victim was frustrated that he was not taken seriously and that the teacher was allowed to continue to have access to young children. He sent the email this week to some parents and FCPS administration (3/20/22). FCPS pressured the police to close the case, which they did on Monday (3/20/22!) without further investigation. I am 100% sure the allegations are true. The victim, understandably, wants to hold the teacher accountable and ensure he is not able to do the same to others. The teacher should not be around children. PLEASE PRESSURE FCPS TO DO THE RIGHT THING AND GET THE GUY OUT OF SCHOOLS!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The male teacher in question still works at Franklin Sherman ? I don’t like this.
My younger brother attended Forestville during that time period. I would really like to know what is going on.
Anonymous wrote:The male teacher in question still works at Franklin Sherman ? I don’t like this.
Anonymous wrote:The male teacher in question still works at Franklin Sherman ? I don’t like this.
Anonymous wrote:I’m very sorry to hear about your friends experience. I have to say that something is not adding up with how quickly the investigation closed. Our family unfortunately was part of a case involving a teacher, our child was not impacted but was interviewed multiple times by forensic investigators because they had contact with the same caretaker. It took a very very long time to resolve, and in this case the teacher was actually innocent…
Anonymous wrote:No matter who sent the email. Is this staff still in FS ? Does anyone know ? There are quite a few older teachers at Franklin Sherman specially working with the lower elementary classes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the investigation has been already closed ?
The accusation is from the early 2000’s, if I am reading the posts right. So the police case could have been reported, investigated, and closed. If the case was closed with no charges then the individual is treated as an innocent person and would be allowed to keep teaching.
But at a minimum the person would be put on administrative leave initially while things are looked into. Something is not adding up.
We have not seen the email. The allegations are from close to 20 years ago. The case could have been reported, the Teacher on adminstrative leave then, investigated, and dismissed. If the case was dismissed, the Teacher would be allowed to return to the classroom. They probably changed schools because of rumors and the like.
The posts make it seem like this is not a new charge to be investigated but something old that is being resurfaced.
Agree with all above but purportedly, email came to parents this week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the investigation has been already closed ?
The accusation is from the early 2000’s, if I am reading the posts right. So the police case could have been reported, investigated, and closed. If the case was closed with no charges then the individual is treated as an innocent person and would be allowed to keep teaching.
But at a minimum the person would be put on administrative leave initially while things are looked into. Something is not adding up.
We have not seen the email. The allegations are from close to 20 years ago. The case could have been reported, the Teacher on adminstrative leave then, investigated, and dismissed. If the case was dismissed, the Teacher would be allowed to return to the classroom. They probably changed schools because of rumors and the like.
The posts make it seem like this is not a new charge to be investigated but something old that is being resurfaced.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the investigation has been already closed ?
The accusation is from the early 2000’s, if I am reading the posts right. So the police case could have been reported, investigated, and closed. If the case was closed with no charges then the individual is treated as an innocent person and would be allowed to keep teaching.
But at a minimum the person would be put on administrative leave initially while things are looked into. Something is not adding up.