Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe 2 total including me. Anymore sounds like hell on earth to me.

Because of logistics or ?

You always end up with a few in the group who are a pain. I want to dine at, visit sites/activities places I will enjoy, not compromise “for the group.”

Then you may not be a good fit for a girls' trip. It is as much, if not more, about hanging out with your friends than only doing what you enjoy.

That is my point, I can just hang out with my friends anytime. Why do I need to go on a trip to hangout as a group?

If I am going a trip, why would I do a bunch of stuff I am not interested in?

So your ideal group size is one. Maybe you should have skipped this thread?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe 2 total including me. Anymore sounds like hell on earth to me.

Because of logistics or ?

You always end up with a few in the group who are a pain. I want to dine at, visit sites/activities places I will enjoy, not compromise “for the group.”

Then you may not be a good fit for a girls' trip. It is as much, if not more, about hanging out with your friends than only doing what you enjoy.

That is my point, I can just hang out with my friends anytime. Why do I need to go on a trip to hangout as a group?

If I am going a trip, why would I do a bunch of stuff I am not interested in?

So your ideal group size is one. Maybe you should have skipped this thread?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe 2 total including me. Anymore sounds like hell on earth to me.

Because of logistics or ?

You always end up with a few in the group who are a pain. I want to dine at, visit sites/activities places I will enjoy, not compromise “for the group.”

Then you may not be a good fit for a girls' trip. It is as much, if not more, about hanging out with your friends than only doing what you enjoy.

That is my point, I can just hang out with my friends anytime. Why do I need to go on a trip to hangout as a group?

If I am going a trip, why would I do a bunch of stuff I am not interested in?

Anonymous wrote:4-8

+1. I did several trips with groups of this size. Usually there is some splitting out during the day and reconnecting in the evening. I think with a group smaller than 4, everyone will always be together, and that's too much for me.

I think 4 is the perfect number. No odd "tag along" numbers. And with 4 you can still book a larger Uber and all ride together.

Plus, the more people you add in, the more personalities there is to deal with.

Worst trip I've ever been on was a girl's trip with 10 women. So much pettiness and little cat fights.

I've been on some successful 3, 5, and 6 person trips, but I always seem to have the best time when there are 4 people total.

I’m doing a girls trip with 9 of us in May and another in July with 6 of us. I think I prefer the 6 because it’s small enough to be intimate but not too small so the dynamic can be more energized and fun when need be.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe 2 total including me. Anymore sounds like hell on earth to me.

Because of logistics or ?

You always end up with a few in the group who are a pain. I want to dine at, visit sites/activities places I will enjoy, not compromise “for the group.”

Then you may not be a good fit for a girls' trip. It is as much, if not more, about hanging out with your friends than only doing what you enjoy.

I agree with PP's that say 6-8. 4 can be easier logistically but there's more pressure to have everyone do the same thing. With 6-8 you can have 2-3 people do their own thing. Things get alot harder and more expensive beyond 8. Finding vacation rentals, transportation, even restaurants will start requiring a fixed menu.

Anonymous wrote:I'm up for anything

Me too!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe 2 total including me. Anymore sounds like hell on earth to me.

Because of logistics or ?

You always end up with a few in the group who are a pain. I want to dine at, visit sites/activities places I will enjoy, not compromise “for the group.”

4. Everyone fits in the car and at the table. More than that and there's too many opinions, to many conversations at once, complicated logistics.

Anonymous wrote:3-4. Easy to get a reservation at a restaurant. Can actually hold a conversation without having to split into smaller groups. Can fit in a rental car or Uber.

+1. 6-8 is fine if people don't mind breaking off and doing things separately in small groups.

I’ve traveled in a group of 5. Lots of fun without being too large of a group.

3-4. Easy to get a reservation at a restaurant. Can actually hold a conversation without having to split into smaller groups. Can fit in a rental car or Uber.

Anonymous wrote:I'm an introvert so being around too many people is exhausting for me. I don't feed off of socializing and constant talking like my opposites

I am also an introvert and prefer groups of 4-6. That way it is less likely I'll be responsible for having to hold up too much of a conversation. Groups of 2 or 3 I feel more responsible to be "on".