Anonymous wrote:The "Smart Growth" lobbyists are trying to push the council to allow for two story ADUs with a 650 sf footprint. That's a 1300 sf house. And they want DC to get rid of the requirement that the owner of the primary dwelling on the property has to live there while the ADU is rented. Seems like a way to undercut single family home zoning and open the door to sales to investors. It will drive prices up and not do a thing for affordable housing. If I spend $300k to build an ADU, I'm going to rent it at market.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because now I can rent that ADU instead of having to live way far out. Unless you think ADU rent will be the same as a similar unit not in someone's back yard.
So you want to trade a minor reduction rental costs for a huge increase in the cost of buying a home? No thanks. All that is doing is increasing inequality. The way most people build wealth is by owning a home and this will make home ownership even harder.
Ummm the rent from the ADU increases the ability of the homeowner to cover the mortgage and by doing so makes the house more affordable - do you really not understand that?
But most importantly it increases the housing supply which is good for people who need housing. Which happens to be everyone.
Yes, it does both of these things. What a weird complaint OP!
Anonymous wrote:What is an ADU? Where do you live that this is legal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We live in a starter home with a decent sized yard. We could easily fit an ADU and we could pay for it by borrowing against the appreciation in the value of our home. And that would increase the value of our home overnight by probably 30 percent.
How exactly does that help affordable housing? How does that help someone trying to save up to buy their first home, a starter home like ours? All it does it drive the price of our starter home beyond the budget of anyone who would be in the market for a starter home.
I can't tell if the D.C. government is cynical or just stupid in how they portray policies that are designed to enrich developers and people who already own homes as somehow helping everyone else.
1) the income it provides to you helps make your house more affordable
2) the rental unit provides a lower cost option to another person or family
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Housing prices are going up because more people can pay for them. If you can’t afford to live in DC move to the suburbs. You don’t have a right to live in Ward 3.
Cool, you've got the right to feel that way but I don't want to hear a peep out of you when you can't get your $8 latte because there's nobody willing to commute from Woodbridge to work for Starbucks wages.
Oh who am I kidding, you'll be the first one making idiotic statements like "nobody wants to work anymore!!"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because now I can rent that ADU instead of having to live way far out. Unless you think ADU rent will be the same as a similar unit not in someone's back yard.
So you want to trade a minor reduction rental costs for a huge increase in the cost of buying a home? No thanks. All that is doing is increasing inequality. The way most people build wealth is by owning a home and this will make home ownership even harder.
Ummm the rent from the ADU increases the ability of the homeowner to cover the mortgage and by doing so makes the house more affordable - do you really not understand that?
But most importantly it increases the housing supply which is good for people who need housing. Which happens to be everyone.
Yes, it does both of these things. What a weird complaint OP!
Income generating capacity increases the value of the property. You don’t seem to have thought this through.
Anonymous wrote:Housing prices are going up because more people can pay for them. If you can’t afford to live in DC move to the suburbs. You don’t have a right to live in Ward 3.
Anonymous wrote:Housing prices are going up because more people can pay for them. If you can’t afford to live in DC move to the suburbs. You don’t have a right to live in Ward 3.
Anonymous wrote:We live in a starter home with a decent sized yard. We could easily fit an ADU and we could pay for it by borrowing against the appreciation in the value of our home. And that would increase the value of our home overnight by probably 30 percent.
How exactly does that help affordable housing? How does that help someone trying to save up to buy their first home, a starter home like ours? All it does it drive the price of our starter home beyond the budget of anyone who would be in the market for a starter home.
I can't tell if the D.C. government is cynical or just stupid in how they portray policies that are designed to enrich developers and people who already own homes as somehow helping everyone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because now I can rent that ADU instead of having to live way far out. Unless you think ADU rent will be the same as a similar unit not in someone's back yard.
So you want to trade a minor reduction rental costs for a huge increase in the cost of buying a home? No thanks. All that is doing is increasing inequality. The way most people build wealth is by owning a home and this will make home ownership even harder.
Ummm the rent from the ADU increases the ability of the homeowner to cover the mortgage and by doing so makes the house more affordable - do you really not understand that?
But most importantly it increases the housing supply which is good for people who need housing. Which happens to be everyone.
Yes, it does both of these things. What a weird complaint OP!