Anonymous wrote:OP here. Yes, I would like the option of virtual as well but I prefer in person at least for my son’s IEP meeting. I find that in a virtual meeting, people are easily distracted and I saw that the PT/OT was doing other things as soon as her part was done. I can’t imagine that happening in person. I wholeheartedly agree that virtual is easier for parents who can’t get away or who have childcare issues. In my case, we have no problem taking time off from work to do this. I’m just surprised I was told that IEP meetings are still virtual and an in-person option was not presented. Our IEP meeting would be in early April.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why does it need to be in person? One of the major upgrades has been virtual parent meetings. Parents don’t have to deal with taking extra time off work to drive to/from the school, no dealing with the parking lot or not knowing which entrance to use, no waiting for the terribly slow ID system to decide to work, no one on staff has to escort the parents to and from the meeting (which itself takes 5-10 minutes). In person meetings need to be a thing of the past!!
Says the general educator who left the IEP at some point in the middle.
Seriously - the virtual IEP meeting doesn’t engage all the members. People tune out (and leave without announcing they are leaving). What gets lost is the needs of the child.
Schools should give families choice. Their heavy handed approach to schedule meetings without checking with the parent as to preference as to format and time is a passive aggressive way of not treating parents as equal team members.
Anonymous wrote:These meetings are during school hours. Very few staff members are mandated attendees. Those employees should have ample coverage for their attendance responsibilities. Meetings typically are scheduled two weeks to four weeks in advance so there’s time for their duties to be covered or another person assigned to the meeting. It’s unacceptable not to give the student the attention that these meetings require and is definitely not a reason to mandate that they stay virtual.
Sounds like virtual allows for school staff to do other things during the meeting than be full participants in the meeting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hope virtual options will remain in the future. The pandemic definitely allowed certain things to be easier. This is one of them. Same with parent/teacher conferences and back to school night. (I do think parents should have the option for IEP and conferences in person, just pointing out this is very convenient for working parents)
It always was an option. Parents just had to ask for a phone or video option. Same for experts parents want at the meeting. The psychologist that did the neuropsychological testing for my child is in Baltimore. The team could meet in person at my child’s school but she participated over Zoom. Saved me for paying for her travel.
That isn’t true. Having someone call into a meeting was an option, but a fully virtual meeting where everyone is on equal footing was not an option.
I have been to so many more IEPs with both parents, and with service providers who aren’t based at individual schools (e.g. The TVI or AT specialist). In many situations virtual is way better. I think the choice should be the parents’ at this point but I hope fully virtual (not MCPS all in one room with “outsiders” on Zoom that’s awful) remains a choice.
I teach at a Title I school, and have seen so much more parent engagement and participation in the virtual meetings. Parents who have to choose between not getting paid and missing an important meeting for the child can now join the meeting from their job while on a break. Parents with young children at home don't have to pack them up and cart them awkwardly into the meeting, or pay for a babysitter. Just this week I had a meeting with both parents joining separately from their fast food/retail jobs. Virtual meetings are so much more equitable.
School psychologist at title 1 school and I absolutely agree.
As a parent I disagree that virtual is more equitable.
During virtual IEP meetings for my child -
[b]* a school administrator was driving his car
* the general educator left before the meeting concluded
* the meeting was put on mute while staff held a side bar conversation
* reports that were left out of the 5 day documents were not available for reference
* at times there were technical difficulties with audio when someone was presenting
* child was at school while parents were at home (very uncomfortable for my child)
Parents should have the choice of virtual or in person. Very rarely does MCPS staff choose an option that is in the best interest of the child or family. The fact that schools have covered up the reality that in person meetings have resumed shows how MCPS operates under lies of omissions. There is no BOE ban against in person IEP meetings. MCPS can no longer hide behind COVID when the reality is to exclude parents from the process.
Anonymous wrote:I had an in person IEP meeting back in September.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[b]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hope virtual options will remain in the future. The pandemic definitely allowed certain things to be easier. This is one of them. Same with parent/teacher conferences and back to school night. (I do think parents should have the option for IEP and conferences in person, just pointing out this is very convenient for working parents)
It always was an option. Parents just had to ask for a phone or video option. Same for experts parents want at the meeting. The psychologist that did the neuropsychological testing for my child is in Baltimore. The team could meet in person at my child’s school but she participated over Zoom. Saved me for paying for her travel.
That isn’t true. Having someone call into a meeting was an option, but a fully virtual meeting where everyone is on equal footing was not an option.
I have been to so many more IEPs with both parents, and with service providers who aren’t based at individual schools (e.g. The TVI or AT specialist). In many situations virtual is way better. I think the choice should be the parents’ at this point but I hope fully virtual (not MCPS all in one room with “outsiders” on Zoom that’s awful) remains a choice.
I teach at a Title I school, and have seen so much more parent engagement and participation in the virtual meetings. Parents who have to choose between not getting paid and missing an important meeting for the child can now join the meeting from their job while on a break. Parents with young children at home don't have to pack them up and cart them awkwardly into the meeting, or pay for a babysitter. Just this week I had a meeting with both parents joining separately from their fast food/retail jobs. Virtual meetings are so much more equitable.
School psychologist at title 1 school and I absolutely agree.
As a parent I disagree that virtual is more equitable.
During virtual IEP meetings for my child -
* a school administrator was driving his car
* the general educator left before the meeting concluded
* the meeting was put on mute while staff held a side bar conversation
* reports that were left out of the 5 day documents were not available for reference
* at times there were technical difficulties with audio when someone was presenting
* child was at school while parents were at home (very uncomfortable for my child)
Parents should have the choice of virtual or in person. Very rarely does MCPS staff choose an option that is in the best interest of the child or family. The fact that schools have covered up the reality that in person meetings have resumed shows how MCPS operates under lies of omissions. There is no BOE ban against in person IEP meetings. MCPS can no longer hide behind COVID when the reality is to exclude parents from the process.
Anonymous wrote:[b]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hope virtual options will remain in the future. The pandemic definitely allowed certain things to be easier. This is one of them. Same with parent/teacher conferences and back to school night. (I do think parents should have the option for IEP and conferences in person, just pointing out this is very convenient for working parents)
It always was an option. Parents just had to ask for a phone or video option. Same for experts parents want at the meeting. The psychologist that did the neuropsychological testing for my child is in Baltimore. The team could meet in person at my child’s school but she participated over Zoom. Saved me for paying for her travel.
That isn’t true. Having someone call into a meeting was an option, but a fully virtual meeting where everyone is on equal footing was not an option.
I have been to so many more IEPs with both parents, and with service providers who aren’t based at individual schools (e.g. The TVI or AT specialist). In many situations virtual is way better. I think the choice should be the parents’ at this point but I hope fully virtual (not MCPS all in one room with “outsiders” on Zoom that’s awful) remains a choice.
I teach at a Title I school, and have seen so much more parent engagement and participation in the virtual meetings. Parents who have to choose between not getting paid and missing an important meeting for the child can now join the meeting from their job while on a break. Parents with young children at home don't have to pack them up and cart them awkwardly into the meeting, or pay for a babysitter. Just this week I had a meeting with both parents joining separately from their fast food/retail jobs. Virtual meetings are so much more equitable.
School psychologist at title 1 school and I absolutely agree.
[b]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hope virtual options will remain in the future. The pandemic definitely allowed certain things to be easier. This is one of them. Same with parent/teacher conferences and back to school night. (I do think parents should have the option for IEP and conferences in person, just pointing out this is very convenient for working parents)
It always was an option. Parents just had to ask for a phone or video option. Same for experts parents want at the meeting. The psychologist that did the neuropsychological testing for my child is in Baltimore. The team could meet in person at my child’s school but she participated over Zoom. Saved me for paying for her travel.
That isn’t true. Having someone call into a meeting was an option, but a fully virtual meeting where everyone is on equal footing was not an option.
I have been to so many more IEPs with both parents, and with service providers who aren’t based at individual schools (e.g. The TVI or AT specialist). In many situations virtual is way better. I think the choice should be the parents’ at this point but I hope fully virtual (not MCPS all in one room with “outsiders” on Zoom that’s awful) remains a choice.
I teach at a Title I school, and have seen so much more parent engagement and participation in the virtual meetings. Parents who have to choose between not getting paid and missing an important meeting for the child can now join the meeting from their job while on a break. Parents with young children at home don't have to pack them up and cart them awkwardly into the meeting, or pay for a babysitter. Just this week I had a meeting with both parents joining separately from their fast food/retail jobs. Virtual meetings are so much more equitable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hope virtual options will remain in the future. The pandemic definitely allowed certain things to be easier. This is one of them. Same with parent/teacher conferences and back to school night. (I do think parents should have the option for IEP and conferences in person, just pointing out this is very convenient for working parents)
It always was an option. Parents just had to ask for a phone or video option. Same for experts parents want at the meeting. The psychologist that did the neuropsychological testing for my child is in Baltimore. The team could meet in person at my child’s school but she participated over Zoom. Saved me for paying for her travel.
That isn’t true. Having someone call into a meeting was an option, but a fully virtual meeting where everyone is on equal footing was not an option.
I have been to so many more IEPs with both parents, and with service providers who aren’t based at individual schools (e.g. The TVI or AT specialist). In many situations virtual is way better. I think the choice should be the parents’ at this point but I hope fully virtual (not MCPS all in one room with “outsiders” on Zoom that’s awful) remains a choice.
I teach at a Title I school, and have seen so much more parent engagement and participation in the virtual meetings. Parents who have to choose between not getting paid and missing an important meeting for the child can now join the meeting from their job while on a break. Parents with young children at home don't have to pack them up and cart them awkwardly into the meeting, or pay for a babysitter. Just this week I had a meeting with both parents joining separately from their fast food/retail jobs. Virtual meetings are so much more equitable.