Anonymous wrote:Big business is not moving to MoCo because schools are in massive decline. There are not good choices for their employees to attend good public schools. Additionally, the emphasis on Vision Zero (pedestrians), which is good, does not also take driving into account. The majority of people drive. Not take public transit. And traffic is horrific, with no relief in sight
As traffic gets worse, and schools decline, no one is moving their HQ, or fortune 100, 200, 500, or even 1000 company to MoCo. But hey, condos, with retail and restaurants on the bottom, we've got lots of that
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC has has green building requirements for over 10 years and it hasn’t slowed down building at all. We have more LEED certified buildings than any other city in the US.ut.
MoCo and DC requirements are different. DC requirements have just enacted international construction codes and don’t apply to existing stock. MoCo requirements are just nonsense and a big fat subsidy to existing real estate owners upset that the county gave away the store to developers. The MoCo bill is complete nonsense and the absolute worst of what Maryland politics are about.
Agreed.
Well, there is the $18 million to the Green Bank. Annually. Which already has millions because of an Exelon settlement. And no customers.
New County government buildings need to be Net Zero. They can't use more energy than they make. It's escalating building costs by about 10%. That you are paying for. They want geothermal energy to heat and cool police stations? New schools? What's the realistic cost of building/installing energy systems like geothermal and solar to meet 100% of the commercial building's needs?
I am all for building energy efficient buildings. But going to Net Zero is crazy. For a County. With no state or federal dollars to back it up.
Anonymous wrote:Big business is not moving to MoCo because schools are in massive decline. There are not good choices for their employees to attend good public schools. Additionally, the emphasis on Vision Zero (pedestrians), which is good, does not also take driving into account. The majority of people drive. Not take public transit. And traffic is horrific, with no relief in sight
As traffic gets worse, and schools decline, no one is moving their HQ, or fortune 100, 200, 500, or even 1000 company to MoCo. But hey, condos, with retail and restaurants on the bottom, we've got lots of that
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC has has green building requirements for over 10 years and it hasn’t slowed down building at all. We have more LEED certified buildings than any other city in the US.ut.
MoCo and DC requirements are different. DC requirements have just enacted international construction codes and don’t apply to existing stock. MoCo requirements are just nonsense and a big fat subsidy to existing real estate owners upset that the county gave away the store to developers. The MoCo bill is complete nonsense and the absolute worst of what Maryland politics are about.
Anonymous wrote:DC has has green building requirements for over 10 years and it hasn’t slowed down building at all. We have more LEED certified buildings than any other city in the US.ut.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems to me that the MoCo Council is full of political hacks (save Gabe) who are just competing to make names for themselves nationally. Why kill all the trees and then make green building laws? They are disdainful of longtime residents, particularly useless Reimer.
Agreed. Honestly surprised that most councilmembers seem more interested in getting more clout on social media than the important and mundane task of good governance. Don’t see Fairfax officials out there like this. It’s embarrassing.
Anonymous wrote:It seems to me that the MoCo Council is full of political hacks (save Gabe) who are just competing to make names for themselves nationally. Why kill all the trees and then make green building laws? They are disdainful of longtime residents, particularly useless Reimer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, are you Jacob Sesker? Harpswell Strategies represents developers, so the source is very biased.
I have no use for the MoCo county council for the most part, but you don't increase an economy by disregarding the environment. We live in a coastal state. Maryland and MoCo should be more focused on environmental issues, not less. Younger generations have no idea how much the environment has been degraded over the past 4-5 decades. They have no baseline. And OP's arguments are tiresome. Yes, new buildings should be better weatherized and use geothermal heat. Yes, the county should buy electric vehicles as it replaces older buses and cars. They should also go a step further if feasible and try to move toward renewable energy. OP says nobody is asking the question s/he is asking, but lots of people are. They may have different answers, sorry.
Every time local politicians concern themselves with national/international issues, it means that local services have/will decline. They need to stay in their lane.
Environmental issues ARE local.
They really aren't. We can't make any dent in climate change alone. At all. It's a waste of money. It just makes people feel good.
Now, if the feds offered subsidies to all state and local governments to put some of these changes in place, that's different. That's using federal funds rather than local funds, which as the article says, should be directed to basic public services. And it impacts the entire nation. That would do some good. What MoCo is doing is like me trimming my toenails in an effort to lose weight.
Anonymous wrote:My thought (which have no basis in evidence) is that Moco combines old indifference (CC) with pie in the sky liberalism (Takoma Park). MD overall has some negatives like Baltimore. VA has been able to navigate changing winds more nimbly. Maybe it's AAP and better tax structures?