Anonymous wrote:I think this is the time to think about creating schools for Asian-Americans (HAACUs) just like we have HBCUs. Of course, we should allow very high performing students from other races to also join in so that Asian-Americans are around diversity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not Asian but I hope they fight back. In my city, our number 1 magnet has a high Asian population. Similar things are happening with the admissions process. However, a large percentage of the Asian population have parents who are poor immigrants. People keep throwing the word "privilege" around. I am mot sure how being a poor immigrant and probably a high percentage are not documented make you privileged.

Privilege doesn’t only refer to the amount of money someone has. There are lots of ways to be advantaged that don’t involve money at all. Kids have no say in what family they are born to and shouldn’t be penalized for that fact.

Don’t black parents at least speak English? She me Asian parents are not fluent in English so that would put them at a disadvantage.

Why does that matter? If the kid speaks fluent English, it's a non-issue. It's the kid who is applying, not the parent.

Because the entire argument for changing the admissions system at TJ was that Asian parents were privileged and URM parents were not privileged. That’s why.

But the evidence demonstrated that the board's goal was actually to increase *racial* diversity, not socio -economic diversity. ALL this equity bullshit would do better to frame all their standards as socio-economic. They'd suffer much less pushback AND actual stand a chance of being constitutional in their actions.

That’s not “the entire argument”. That’s not part of the argument at all. The argument was only a handful of black, Hispanic, and economically-disadvantaged kids were getting in each year.

What about economically-disadvantaged and English-learning Asian students? They benefit from the new admissions process.

The Asian American community is an incredibly diverse group, and the revised admissions process benefits all students, including Asian American students who are low-income or English language learners, a fact that the Coalition for TJ ignores,” said Niyati Shah, AAAJ (Asian Americans Advancing Justice).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not Asian but I hope they fight back. In my city, our number 1 magnet has a high Asian population. Similar things are happening with the admissions process. However, a large percentage of the Asian population have parents who are poor immigrants. People keep throwing the word "privilege" around. I am mot sure how being a poor immigrant and probably a high percentage are not documented make you privileged.

Privilege doesn’t only refer to the amount of money someone has. There are lots of ways to be advantaged that don’t involve money at all. Kids have no say in what family they are born to and shouldn’t be penalized for that fact.

Don’t black parents at least speak English? She me Asian parents are not fluent in English so that would put them at a disadvantage.

Why does that matter? If the kid speaks fluent English, it's a non-issue. It's the kid who is applying, not the parent.

Because the entire argument for changing the admissions system at TJ was that Asian parents were privileged and URM parents were not privileged. That’s why.

If you think that's the entire argument, then maybe you're not very fluent in English or just don't understand the learning value of a diverse student body.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not Asian but I hope they fight back. In my city, our number 1 magnet has a high Asian population. Similar things are happening with the admissions process. However, a large percentage of the Asian population have parents who are poor immigrants. People keep throwing the word "privilege" around. I am mot sure how being a poor immigrant and probably a high percentage are not documented make you privileged.

Privilege doesn’t only refer to the amount of money someone has. There are lots of ways to be advantaged that don’t involve money at all. Kids have no say in what family they are born to and shouldn’t be penalized for that fact.

Don’t black parents at least speak English? She me Asian parents are not fluent in English so that would put them at a disadvantage.

Why does that matter? If the kid speaks fluent English, it's a non-issue. It's the kid who is applying, not the parent.

Because the entire argument for changing the admissions system at TJ was that Asian parents were privileged and URM parents were not privileged. That’s why.

Anonymous wrote:I am not Asian but I hope they fight back. In my city, our number 1 magnet has a high Asian population. Similar things are happening with the admissions process. However, a large percentage of the Asian population have parents who are poor immigrants. People keep throwing the word "privilege" around. I am mot sure how being a poor immigrant and probably a high percentage are not documented make you privileged.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not Asian but I hope they fight back. In my city, our number 1 magnet has a high Asian population. Similar things are happening with the admissions process. However, a large percentage of the Asian population have parents who are poor immigrants. People keep throwing the word "privilege" around. I am mot sure how being a poor immigrant and probably a high percentage are not documented make you privileged.

Privilege doesn’t only refer to the amount of money someone has. There are lots of ways to be advantaged that don’t involve money at all. Kids have no say in what family they are born to and shouldn’t be penalized for that fact.

Don’t black parents at least speak English? She me Asian parents are not fluent in English so that would put them at a disadvantage.

Why does that matter? If the kid speaks fluent English, it's a non-issue. It's the kid who is applying, not the parent.

Because the entire argument for changing the admissions system at TJ was that Asian parents were privileged and URM parents were not privileged. That’s why.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not Asian but I hope they fight back. In my city, our number 1 magnet has a high Asian population. Similar things are happening with the admissions process. However, a large percentage of the Asian population have parents who are poor immigrants. People keep throwing the word "privilege" around. I am mot sure how being a poor immigrant and probably a high percentage are not documented make you privileged.

Privilege doesn’t only refer to the amount of money someone has. There are lots of ways to be advantaged that don’t involve money at all. Kids have no say in what family they are born to and shouldn’t be penalized for that fact.

Don’t black parents at least speak English? She me Asian parents are not fluent in English so that would put them at a disadvantage.

Why does that matter? If the kid speaks fluent English, it's a non-issue. It's the kid who is applying, not the parent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not Asian but I hope they fight back. In my city, our number 1 magnet has a high Asian population. Similar things are happening with the admissions process. However, a large percentage of the Asian population have parents who are poor immigrants. People keep throwing the word "privilege" around. I am mot sure how being a poor immigrant and probably a high percentage are not documented make you privileged.

Privilege doesn’t only refer to the amount of money someone has. There are lots of ways to be advantaged that don’t involve money at all. Kids have no say in what family they are born to and shouldn’t be penalized for that fact.

Don’t black parents at least speak English? She me Asian parents are not fluent in English so that would put them at a disadvantage.

Anonymous wrote:From the numbers at elite colleges and high schools, there is still a good percentage of Asian students...just a lot of hate from the parents of the kids who didn't get in. None of the Asians at those schools are complaining about a lack of Asian peers.

Just because you test well and have a high GPA doesn't mean you're entitled to admission. There are other factors involved. When will you understand that?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All I read here is that Asians are afraid to lash out against the legacy process which is mostly white privilege. Sounds like they're afraid to anger them.

legacy process is a lot harder to fight against because it's nnot about race, even as most of those who benefit from it are white UMC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not Asian but I hope they fight back. In my city, our number 1 magnet has a high Asian population. Similar things are happening with the admissions process. However, a large percentage of the Asian population have parents who are poor immigrants. People keep throwing the word "privilege" around. I am mot sure how being a poor immigrant and probably a high percentage are not documented make you privileged.

Privilege doesn’t only refer to the amount of money someone has. There are lots of ways to be advantaged that don’t involve money at all. Kids have no say in what family they are born to and shouldn’t be penalized for that fact.

DP.. you know that goes both ways, right? It applies to the Asian American immigrant kid, too.