She's dead in the eyes and doesn't smize. I don't like her chin, either. She moves product, because of the Kardashian name, not her presence as a model.

Anonymous wrote:I think she is beautiful.

Her eyes are always dead. They only light up when she's looking at Harry Styles.

I think she is beautiful.

Anonymous wrote:Her runway walk is horrendous. I can say this as someone who worked in the modeling industry for years, but I’ve seen it on social media for years, about how bad it is!!

can you explain more? It's fascinating for me, since I have no idea what this industry is like. What is wrong with her walk?

Anonymous wrote:Agreed. She's a beauty with no talent and no real presence/power on camera. Her beauty and her famous sisters have helped to carry her this far.

+1

Nope you got it all wrong. Kendall looks like Kendall off the runway and cover of Vogue. That's unique. She's all Jenner. Other K's don't hold a candle to her.

Gigi Hadid looks like she is 40.

Anonymous wrote:Not that anyone cares, but I think she's very conventional looking and wouldn't be a top model without her famous family. Of course she's very pretty, but in a forgettable, almost generic way. The memorable models I can think of were very pretty but had something unusual in their features that make them instantly recognizable (Gigi Hadid, Kate Moss, Miranda Kerr, Gisele, Naomi). She doesn't have that.

no.

Her runway walk is horrendous. I can say this as someone who worked in the modeling industry for years, but I’ve seen it on social media for years, about how bad it is!!

Anonymous wrote:Not that anyone cares, but I think she's very conventional looking and wouldn't be a top model without her famous family. Of course she's very pretty, but in a forgettable, almost generic way. The memorable models I can think of were very pretty but had something unusual in their features that make them instantly recognizable (Gigi Hadid, Kate Moss, Miranda Kerr, Gisele, Naomi). She doesn't have that.

Agreed completely. She lacks that "it" factor. If she were some poor Russian girl lining up with hundreds of peers at a go-see hoping to sign with an agency, I do not think she would make the cut.

Gigi I'm on the fence about. I think she is good in print, but if she were a nobody without rich parents pushing her career those agencies would also tell her to lose weight and make her work on her walk before ever considering putting her on a runway. She clomp clomp clomps like a Clydesdale.

Not that anyone cares, but I think she's very conventional looking and wouldn't be a top model without her famous family. Of course she's very pretty, but in a forgettable, almost generic way. The memorable models I can think of were very pretty but had something unusual in their features that make them instantly recognizable (Gigi Hadid, Kate Moss, Miranda Kerr, Gisele, Naomi). She doesn't have that.

She's not even the prettiest of the Kardashian/Jenner women. She's truly meh looking. Meh is actually great for a skilled model who can transform her look in different ways. But Kendall isn't a skilled model.

Anonymous wrote:She moves product. That makes her a good model.

+1. If you're a business, that is the only thing that you're looking for. She sells. She has a massive social media footprint. Who cares what her modeling ability really is if she can sell your lip liner?

She's definitely very pretty, but I agree that something is not working with her modeling in some photos - I think it is that she's not posing, and doesn't look excited about the whole thing.

Anonymous wrote:She moves product. That makes her a good model.

I mean so does Khloe and she’s built like a linebacker.