Anonymous
Post 02/19/2022 11:47     Subject: Men under 5'7" shouldn't have human rights
Anonymous wrote:Imagine a prominent man saying that women over 130 pounds shouldn't have human rights. Women's heads would explode.


We don’t really have to imagine that.
Anonymous
Post 02/19/2022 11:47     Subject: Re:Men under 5'7" shouldn't have human rights
Anonymous wrote:We are all short in our family, but I think what she said is what many men who are tall privately feel. Not human rights necessarily, but that short men are lesser.


Agree.
Maybe not lesser as a human but I’m sure they feel sorry for shorter men, like most people would privately feel sorry for disabled people even though we know we shouldn’t be saying that out loud.
Anonymous
Post 02/19/2022 11:41     Subject: Men under 5'7" shouldn't have human rights
She's trolling and apparently getting the reaction she wanted. All she really wanted was attention.
Anonymous
Post 02/19/2022 11:40     Subject: Men under 5'7" shouldn't have human rights
Imagine a prominent man saying that women over 130 pounds shouldn't have human rights. Women's heads would explode.
Anonymous
Post 02/19/2022 11:26     Subject: Men under 5'7" shouldn't have human rights
Anonymous wrote:Yep
Sucks to be judged solely by your looks, doesn’t it boys?
We hear ya!
- all of womankind


Yes. Physical shaming is a fair game now for men and women!!
Anonymous
Post 02/19/2022 11:19     Subject: Re:Men under 5'7" shouldn't have human rights
Omg are you saying someone with zero power or authority said something clearly wrong and bad and no one of substance agreed with her and now men are the real victims?
Anonymous
Post 02/19/2022 11:17     Subject: Men under 5'7" shouldn't have human rights
Yep
Sucks to be judged solely by your looks, doesn’t it boys?
We hear ya!
- all of womankind
Anonymous
Post 02/19/2022 11:16     Subject: Re:Men under 5'7" shouldn't have human rights
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What is the recommended cut off height for women to lose their human designation?


Under 5’ and over 5’4”. It’s just science.


And what age do they need to reach these heights by?

Should we start a new national zoo for all the new non humans ?[/quote

Definitely - and their top performers should be invited to do tricks on Late Night comedy shows …

Anonymous
Post 02/19/2022 11:10     Subject: Men under 5'7" shouldn't have human rights
Anonymous wrote:A prominent female in the world of gaming is under fire for saying that any man under 5'7" shouldn't have human rights and thst they should undergo bone lengthing procedures:

https://news.yahoo.com/japanese-female-pro-gamer-fired-014754590.html

She is from Japan where the average height for a man is 5'7", meaning a huge portion of Japanese men, according to her, do not deserve human rights simply because of their height. The hypocrisy here is truly astounding. We have so many efforts for body positivity for women where being overweight is celebrated. Yet where is the same kind of thing for men? You have nasty toxic women out there saying men under some certain level of height don't even deserve to live or deserve human rights. You can at least control your weight by not stuffing your face. How exactly can you change your DNA to make yourself taller? If we are going to push body positive culture, then it should go for everyone.


Woman. it was one woman saying it, and she was fired. It's literally in the title that she was fired.

Body positivity culture is for everyone. As a well-informed advocate for it, surely you know that? Oh, wait, no. You ignore the situations where women and overweight people are insulted, and instead just found this one article where a pretty young woman said something nasty about men and got upset about it.

Op, reflect.
Anonymous
Post 02/19/2022 11:10     Subject: Men under 5'7" shouldn't have human rights
Anonymous wrote:She said something so stupid! She doesn’t even deserve an answer. Not sure why she is having so much attention in the news (or maybe this was her goal to begin with)


Yes. That was her goal.
Anonymous
Post 02/19/2022 11:09     Subject: Re:Men under 5'7" shouldn't have human rights
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What is the recommended cut off height for women to lose their human designation?


Under 5’ and over 5’4”. It’s just science.


And what age do they need to reach these heights by?

Should we start a new national zoo for all the new non humans ?


Like…17? Hit your target height or you’re in the zoo. No exceptions.
Anonymous
Post 02/19/2022 11:08     Subject: Men under 5'7" shouldn't have human rights
Anonymous wrote:So this makes it okay for men to shame fat women, ugly women, poor women, single women...etc I guess?


Why would you think one woman saying something batshit crazy means that men can shame women who are fat, ugly, poor, or single? What’s your reasoning here?
Anonymous
Post 02/19/2022 11:07     Subject: Men under 5'7" shouldn't have human rights
So this makes it okay for men to shame fat women, ugly women, poor women, single women...etc I guess?
Anonymous
Post 02/19/2022 11:06     Subject: Men under 5'7" shouldn't have human rights
She said something so stupid! She doesn’t even deserve an answer. Not sure why she is having so much attention in the news (or maybe this was her goal to begin with)
Anonymous
Post 02/19/2022 11:03     Subject: Re:Men under 5'7" shouldn't have human rights
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We are all short in our family, but I think what she said is what many men who are tall privately feel. Not human rights necessarily, but that short men are lesser.


This is exactly it. The favoritism society gives toward men comes from patriarchy. Society things men should be big and strong and women small and weak, so we punish short men and big women. Two sides of the same coin.


ewww I hate how big humans are getting. I don't just mean fat but all around big. From better nutrition and easier lives. Will we just keep taking up space like goldfish?