Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The person in question does not have to be on Ancestry or 23. After taking the test, connect yourself to anyone you match with, 3rd cousin, etc., that and you don't recognize, then work from there using census records, address books, FB, family trees that have been posted, etc. She is there, you just have to research.
This doesn't make sense to me. Yes, OP will find all sorts of cousins and can trace backward to find their ancestors in common. But they can't use those cousins to find an untested adoptee.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is a website with some ideas.
https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/adoption/search/records/
I think it's great you are doing this and I hope you find your sibling!
I disagree. OP has no right to butt into someone else's life to satisfy her morbid curiosity. Leave it be. If your mother had wanted to pursue this then she would have done so. Again, do not interfere in their life!
Wanting to know your own sibling is not “morbid curiosity”. It is a normal human emotion. Family is family. A sibling relationship is one more the most important relationships someone can have. My sister and I were separated for 45 years, but she is now one of the 5 closest relationships I have in my life. Nothing about that is “morbid”. It is fundamental. It is primal. Family bonds being ripped apart by adoption is a very new phenomenon in human history. Our current adoption industry based on profits, coercion, secrecy, and the complete erasure of a child’s original identity is less than 100 years old. It is NOT normal. And it is not “morbid” for people to feel a keen need to find their lost family members. As keen as if they had been stolen, which in many families they were.
Anonymous wrote:The person in question does not have to be on Ancestry or 23. After taking the test, connect yourself to anyone you match with, 3rd cousin, etc., that and you don't recognize, then work from there using census records, address books, FB, family trees that have been posted, etc. She is there, you just have to research.
Anonymous wrote:If your mother is alive you need to let this be her decision or the decision of the person placed for adoption. You can NOT drive this - that's inappropriate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is a website with some ideas.
https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/adoption/search/records/
I think it's great you are doing this and I hope you find your sibling!
I disagree. OP has no right to butt into someone else's life to satisfy her morbid curiosity. Leave it be. If your mother had wanted to pursue this then she would have done so. Again, do not interfere in their life!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your mother is alive you need to let this be her decision or the decision of the person placed for adoption. You can NOT drive this - that's inappropriate.
Sorry. But it is appropriate, as the birtgh mother actually isn't entitled to privacy of who is related to whom. The adult child is allowed privacy once he or she indicates they aren't interested, but, keep in mind this relationship affects absolutely everyone...the children and grandchildren of these people, the father that no one mentions, and his family.
The birth mom is absolutely entitled to privacy and at the time of adoption was promised it.
Anonymous wrote:OP, putting your info on Ancestry is fine but understand there could be some collateral damage from that fact. My dad, who is into genealogy, convinced me to do Ancestry. I had no problem with that. Then a couple of years later, I had a weird match. Well...turns out my mother gave a baby up for adoption in the late 60s, before she met my father. My mother and father both knew this and were never going to tell me (an only child) until things showed up on Ancestry. (And yes, I guess they didn't think their plan through.)
I am in contact with my half-sister, who knew she was adopted and is a lovely person. My parents no longer speak of her or of what happened (swept back under the rug). But it all really threw me for a loop and it's taken a couple of years of therapy to work through the aftermath. Logically I can understand why they kept it from me, but emotionally it's been really hard. My trust and my relationship with them is not the same as before. I wonder what else they are not telling me. I get angry that, even if they waited to tell me when I was an adult, I could've known my sister for 20 years by now rather than 2. And finally I'm pissed that they dropped a bomb on me then left me to deal with it alone.
I just wanted to share my experience as an innocent party who was affected by all of this. I guess I could have not done the DNA but I had no reason to believe it would blow things up.
Anonymous wrote:If your mother is alive you need to let this be her decision or the decision of the person placed for adoption. You can NOT drive this - that's inappropriate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your mother is alive you need to let this be her decision or the decision of the person placed for adoption. You can NOT drive this - that's inappropriate.
Sorry. But it is appropriate, as the birtgh mother actually isn't entitled to privacy of who is related to whom. The adult child is allowed privacy once he or she indicates they aren't interested, but, keep in mind this relationship affects absolutely everyone...the children and grandchildren of these people, the father that no one mentions, and his family.
The birth mom is absolutely entitled to privacy and at the time of adoption was promised it.
You are several decades off. Here are some other tried and true mandates from this time:
Women who were unmarried couldn't keep their babies.
Young women ( teens) couldn't keep their babies
Thousands upon thousands of Catholic babies were literally stolen from unmarried women. Additionally, there are graveyards of babies all over Ireland and the US
Pregnant and unmarried women were shunned from society, while the fathers had no responsibility.
Young women were kept in maternity homes and sedated often.
Babies were often sold to rich white families. Babies were sold under the table to ethnic families who were prevented from adopting out of their ethnicity.
Even today, a well off parent will adopt because a poor mother can't afford to keep her baby. This is a consumer driven elitist situation.
There were lots of private adoptions, which is another word for the sale of children.
Privacy was promised because of shame of the mother and to keep the identity of the father safe. These were social mores of the time based upon religious and misogynistic principles.
There's no "privacy" granted when it comes to a person's identity. Adoptees aren't puppies. Regardless, it no longer matters. DNA has entirely changed this antiquated notion of any privacy. There was never any privacy.
You are wrong. There are all kinds of adoptions today and some birth mom's still want their privacy.
The same things that happened then, still happen today. There are lots of ethical and unethical adoptions.
But, if a birth mom wants no contact, that should be respected.
Lots of reasons including rape, affairs, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your mother is alive you need to let this be her decision or the decision of the person placed for adoption. You can NOT drive this - that's inappropriate.
Sorry. But it is appropriate, as the birtgh mother actually isn't entitled to privacy of who is related to whom. The adult child is allowed privacy once he or she indicates they aren't interested, but, keep in mind this relationship affects absolutely everyone...the children and grandchildren of these people, the father that no one mentions, and his family.
The birth mom is absolutely entitled to privacy and at the time of adoption was promised it.
You are several decades off. Here are some other tried and true mandates from this time:
Women who were unmarried couldn't keep their babies.
Young women ( teens) couldn't keep their babies
Thousands upon thousands of Catholic babies were literally stolen from unmarried women. Additionally, there are graveyards of babies all over Ireland and the US
Pregnant and unmarried women were shunned from society, while the fathers had no responsibility.
Young women were kept in maternity homes and sedated often.
Babies were often sold to rich white families. Babies were sold under the table to ethnic families who were prevented from adopting out of their ethnicity.
Even today, a well off parent will adopt because a poor mother can't afford to keep her baby. This is a consumer driven elitist situation.
There were lots of private adoptions, which is another word for the sale of children.
Privacy was promised because of shame of the mother and to keep the identity of the father safe. These were social mores of the time based upon religious and misogynistic principles.
There's no "privacy" granted when it comes to a person's identity. Adoptees aren't puppies. Regardless, it no longer matters. DNA has entirely changed this antiquated notion of any privacy. There was never any privacy.
Anonymous wrote:Here is a website with some ideas.
https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/adoption/search/records/
I think it's great you are doing this and I hope you find your sibling!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your mother is alive you need to let this be her decision or the decision of the person placed for adoption. You can NOT drive this - that's inappropriate.
Sorry. But it is appropriate, as the birtgh mother actually isn't entitled to privacy of who is related to whom. The adult child is allowed privacy once he or she indicates they aren't interested, but, keep in mind this relationship affects absolutely everyone...the children and grandchildren of these people, the father that no one mentions, and his family.
The birth mom is absolutely entitled to privacy and at the time of adoption was promised it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your mother is alive you need to let this be her decision or the decision of the person placed for adoption. You can NOT drive this - that's inappropriate.
Sorry. But it is appropriate, as the birtgh mother actually isn't entitled to privacy of who is related to whom. The adult child is allowed privacy once he or she indicates they aren't interested, but, keep in mind this relationship affects absolutely everyone...the children and grandchildren of these people, the father that no one mentions, and his family.