Anonymous wrote:They need a Landon-style checkpoint.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How awful. And now that employee is going to lose their job because some nutbag didn't want to leave a domestic dispute in their domicile.
Why would you assume the employee will loose her job? I would not at all make that assumption if anything, I would hope the school helps her.
*lose
If you work at a school with children and your personal life creates a threat to those children, it's safe to say that you'll at best have a very contentious annual review.
You’re a terrible human and I’d say that to your face
Anonymous wrote:This article states it was with a contractor. Wonder if it’s related to the lawsuit?
https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-beat/police-fire/police-take-person-into-custody-following-domestic-related-event-at-holton-arms-school/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How awful. And now that employee is going to lose their job because some nutbag didn't want to leave a domestic dispute in their domicile.
Why would you assume the employee will loose her job? I would not at all make that assumption if anything, I would hope the school helps her.
*lose
If you work at a school with children and your personal life creates a threat to those children, it's safe to say that you'll at best have a very contentious annual review.
You’re a terrible human and I’d say that to your face
Anonymous wrote:They need a Landon-style checkpoint.
Anonymous wrote:Holton parent here. I would be shocked if the school did anything other than support the employee to the utmost.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How awful. And now that employee is going to lose their job because some nutbag didn't want to leave a domestic dispute in their domicile.
Why would you assume the employee will loose her job? I would not at all make that assumption if anything, I would hope the school helps her.
*lose
If you work at a school with children and your personal life creates a threat to those children, it's safe to say that you'll at best have a very contentious annual review.
Anonymous wrote:I would expect Holton to support the employee, man or woman. They are the victim and while unfortunate this happened at school, the school should absolutely not punsih the employee. Guessing the topic of domestic/partner violence will now be part of the SEL of Upper School at least. Maybe it already has been. And, unfortunately becauses this is just the state of real society, it should be. Private schools aren't excluded from the world of domestic abuse and violence -- though I suppose they have families that are pretty good at hiding it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How awful. And now that employee is going to lose their job because some nutbag didn't want to leave a domestic dispute in their domicile.
Why would you assume the employee will loose her job? I would not at all make that assumption if anything, I would hope the school helps her.
+1 Holton parent - thank you for keeping all safe!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How awful. And now that employee is going to lose their job because some nutbag didn't want to leave a domestic dispute in their domicile.
Why would you assume the employee will loose her job? I would not at all make that assumption if anything, I would hope the school helps her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How awful. And now that employee is going to lose their job because some nutbag didn't want to leave a domestic dispute in their domicile.
Why would you assume the employee will loose her job? I would not at all make that assumption if anything, I would hope the school helps her.
*lose
If you work at a school with children and your personal life creates a threat to those children, it's safe to say that you'll at best have a very contentious annual review.