Anonymous
02/12/2022 22:39
Subject: Youngkin steps in it again
Anonymous wrote:Mistakes happen, he apologized, this makes the woke police look worst
I'm one of two Indian women in my office and get confused for the other one (15 years younger, and at least 50lbs heavier than me) ALL THE TIME. It makes me really, really angry. I bet that has never happened to you before.
Anonymous
02/12/2022 22:22
Subject: Youngkin steps in it again
Mistakes happen, he apologized, this makes the woke police look worst
Anonymous
02/12/2022 22:10
Subject: Re:Youngkin steps in it again
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So?
I wonder if stories like this, where the suggestion of racism is maybe plausible, but factually is certainly not an active act of racism, are playing in favor of the Rs going in to the midterms. They just don’t seem that concerned.
We're not. Because normal, moderate, *rational* people see this as a common mistake - people confuse people all the time, regardless of race. I'm white and was constantly confused with another girl in college. I know a few women who, to me, look exactly alike and I can never remember their names. They're all white. Does this make me a racist, or a normal person? This type of nonsense is going to backfire bigly on the Dems, as it should. LWNJ gotcha moments are not going to work in your favor.
You get that these women look nothing alike, right?
Anonymous
02/12/2022 21:51
Subject: Re:Youngkin steps in it again
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That woman has already started 2 scandals about Youngkin in this first month in office. This is the third. She hates him.
Takes two to tango. Youngkin keeps screwing up and giving her ammunition. Maybe if Youngkin weren't such an a-hole he wouldn't have a problem.
I never said they were legitimate scandal. As I recall she screeched that Youngkin's AG fired his entire civil rights division on day one. Didn't happen. No apology from her though.
Anonymous
02/12/2022 21:46
Subject: Re:Youngkin steps in it again
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So?
I wonder if stories like this, where the suggestion of racism is maybe plausible, but factually is certainly not an active act of racism, are playing in favor of the Rs going in to the midterms. They just don’t seem that concerned.
We're not. Because normal, moderate, *rational* people see this as a common mistake - people confuse people all the time, regardless of race. I'm white and was constantly confused with another girl in college. I know a few women who, to me, look exactly alike and I can never remember their names. They're all white. Does this make me a racist, or a normal person? This type of nonsense is going to backfire bigly on the Dems, as it should. LWNJ gotcha moments are not going to work in your favor.
Anonymous
02/12/2022 21:41
Subject: Re:Youngkin steps in it again
Anonymous wrote:That woman has already started 2 scandals about Youngkin in this first month in office. This is the third. She hates him.
Takes two to tango. Youngkin keeps screwing up and giving her ammunition. Maybe if Youngkin weren't such an a-hole he wouldn't have a problem.
Anonymous
02/12/2022 21:38
Subject: Youngkin steps in it again
Anonymous wrote:This Youngkin administration has had so many screw ups in such a short time. Total incompetents.
+1
This is what the irrational mob got us.
Anonymous
02/12/2022 21:29
Subject: Youngkin steps in it again
Anonymous wrote:This Youngkin administration has had so many screw ups in such a short time. Total incompetents.
It is an impressive number of unforced errors. That's mediocre white men for you.
Anonymous
02/12/2022 21:25
Subject: Re:Youngkin steps in it again
Anonymous wrote:So?
I wonder if stories like this, where the suggestion of racism is maybe plausible, but factually is certainly not an active act of racism, are playing in favor of the Rs going in to the midterms. They just don’t seem that concerned.
Anonymous
02/12/2022 21:10
Subject: Re:Youngkin steps in it again
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That woman has already started 2 scandals about Youngkin in this first month in office. This is the third. She hates him.
She was planning to keep it private until Youngkin decided to berate Democrats for not confirming Wheeler. Apparently they exist for the sole purpose of rubber stamping whatever Youngkin wants, and really need to know their place.
DP. Ah, so she's retaliating against him for something totally unrelated. She sure is a winner.
Keeping it private was a courtesy to Youngkin. It would have been nice if Youngkin could have shown basic courtesy back. But apparently you don’t hold white wen to the same standard of decorum as you do black women. Figures.
What? This woman was wrong and you know it. He made a mistake, apologized and the mistake had nothing to do with his administration's nomination of Wheeler. I'm not even seeing where he was discourteous about the Wheeler nomination.
Because you didn’t bother to read the whole article before jumping to his defense.
WHERE is the discourtesy? Seriously.
Lucas told The Washington Post that she initially planned to keep Youngkin's gaffe private but reconsidered after a bitter debate between Youngkin, a Republican, and Senate Democrats over their refusal to confirm former Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Andrew Wheeler as the state's Secretary of Natural and Historic Resources.
Anonymous
02/12/2022 21:10
Subject: Re:Youngkin steps in it again
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That woman has already started 2 scandals about Youngkin in this first month in office. This is the third. She hates him.
She was planning to keep it private until Youngkin decided to berate Democrats for not confirming Wheeler. Apparently they exist for the sole purpose of rubber stamping whatever Youngkin wants, and really need to know their place.
DP. Ah, so she's retaliating against him for something totally unrelated. She sure is a winner.
Keeping it private was a courtesy to Youngkin. It would have been nice if Youngkin could have shown basic courtesy back. But apparently you don’t hold white wen to the same standard of decorum as you do black women. Figures.
You seem confused. She made this nothingburger public because she was enraged with him about something totally unrelated. She's not a nice person and knows nothing about "basic courtesy." Period.
Anonymous
02/12/2022 21:08
Subject: Youngkin steps in it again
Anonymous wrote:Eh, it was an honest mistake. And the names are similar. It happens.
He apologized privately and publicly.
Agreed. But apparently, that wasn't enough for Louise. She loves a gotcha moment. Too bad she doesn't have an ounce of grace.
Anonymous
02/12/2022 21:05
Subject: Re:Youngkin steps in it again
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That woman has already started 2 scandals about Youngkin in this first month in office. This is the third. She hates him.
She was planning to keep it private until Youngkin decided to berate Democrats for not confirming Wheeler. Apparently they exist for the sole purpose of rubber stamping whatever Youngkin wants, and really need to know their place.
DP. Ah, so she's retaliating against him for something totally unrelated. She sure is a winner.
Keeping it private was a courtesy to Youngkin. It would have been nice if Youngkin could have shown basic courtesy back. But apparently you don’t hold white wen to the same standard of decorum as you do black women. Figures.
What? This woman was wrong and you know it. He made a mistake, apologized and the mistake had nothing to do with his administration's nomination of Wheeler. I'm not even seeing where he was discourteous about the Wheeler nomination.
Because you didn’t bother to read the whole article before jumping to his defense.
Anonymous
02/12/2022 21:04
Subject: Re:Youngkin steps in it again
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That woman has already started 2 scandals about Youngkin in this first month in office. This is the third. She hates him.
She was planning to keep it private until Youngkin decided to berate Democrats for not confirming Wheeler. Apparently they exist for the sole purpose of rubber stamping whatever Youngkin wants, and really need to know their place.
DP. Ah, so she's retaliating against him for something totally unrelated. She sure is a winner.
Keeping it private was a courtesy to Youngkin. It would have been nice if Youngkin could have shown basic courtesy back. But apparently you don’t hold white wen to the same standard of decorum as you do black women. Figures.
What? This woman was wrong and you know it. He made a mistake, apologized and the mistake had nothing to do with his administration's nomination of Wheeler. I'm not even seeing where he was discourteous about the Wheeler nomination.
Anonymous
02/12/2022 21:03
Subject: Youngkin steps in it again
Anonymous wrote:That was a mediocre apology. Don't start with excuses.
The brainwashed right must defend Youngkin no matter how wrong he is. He’s the second coming of Christ, didn’t you know?