Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I won't be watching it:
https://time.com/6146419/inventing-anna-rachel-williams-anna-delvey/
The person who wrote that article WROTE A BOOK. She’s being hypocritical.
She was taken for $60k by Delvey.
Yet she was also happy to accept thousands of dollars worth of meals and beauty treatments from Anna up until the point Rachel VOLUNTEERED her card. You shouldn’t volunteer to give something you can’t afford to lose, really.
Anna gambled big with money she didn’t have in an effort to achieve something big, while Rachel comes off as a vapid girl whose interests are gossip, socialising, and fashion only (in Rachel’s book and the series). Rachel’s interviews that she did 1+ years ago, which I watched on YouTube after reading her book, made her seem like an airhead.
I have more respect for Anna.
Anonymous wrote:I read My Friend Anna and I was happy to see that the writers/producers viewed Rachel Williams the way I did when I read her tell-all about being defrauded by Anna. Rachel basically hung out with Anna for months and was happy for Anna to pay for beauty treatments, expensive meals, and travel, and then Rachel was stupid enough not to understand that volunteering her card (her corporate card!) to the hotel in Morocco was going to end with charges to the card.
While Anna was a scammer, Rachel was a shallow opportunist.
The part I didn’t understand about this in the movie was why they got a 40-something actress with wrinkles, a saggy double chin, and rubbery lip fillers to play 20-something Rachel. It was very distracting to see the Rachel-actress’s mannerisms (confused, innocent eye widening and furrowed brows, over and over, in every scene, and her girlish voice and outbursts) when I know the real Rachel had been mid-twenties. Even though they dressed up the Rachel-actress in girlish dresses and long hair, it looked so off having her pretend to be the same age as Anna. If they were set on using the 40-something actress, why not change the character’s age to reflect this? I’m waiting to see the real Rachel’s response to seeing herself portrayed so badly in the series.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I won't be watching it:
https://time.com/6146419/inventing-anna-rachel-williams-anna-delvey/
The person who wrote that article WROTE A BOOK. She’s being hypocritical.
She was taken for $60k by Delvey.
Yet she was also happy to accept thousands of dollars worth of meals and beauty treatments from Anna up until the point Rachel VOLUNTEERED her card. You shouldn’t volunteer to give something you can’t afford to lose, really.
Anna gambled big with money she didn’t have in an effort to achieve something big, while Rachel comes off as a vapid girl whose interests are gossip, socialising, and fashion only (in Rachel’s book and the series). Rachel’s interviews that she did 1+ years ago, which I watched on YouTube after reading her book, made her seem like an airhead.
I have more respect for Anna.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love it! But damn the accent is so bad and changes nonstop.
+1
I've only seen a trailer, so I'll have to actually watch the real thing, but it seemed like Julia Garner's accent was a mashup of Ruth and some weird Euro-trash accent.
Like Julia has embodied Ruth Langmore so well she can't switch it off.
The real Anna sounds nothing like that of you watch news interviews. It wouldn't be so weird if Julia didn't do the press junket had talked about how hard she worked on nailing the accent. It's like she protests too much
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love Ruth garner but she is not good in this.
Julia garner duh
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I won't be watching it:
https://time.com/6146419/inventing-anna-rachel-williams-anna-delvey/
The person who wrote that article WROTE A BOOK. She’s being hypocritical.
She was taken for $60k by Delvey.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I won't be watching it:
https://time.com/6146419/inventing-anna-rachel-williams-anna-delvey/
The person who wrote that article WROTE A BOOK. She’s being hypocritical.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I won't be watching it:
https://time.com/6146419/inventing-anna-rachel-williams-anna-delvey/
The person who wrote that article WROTE A BOOK. She’s being hypocritical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I won't be watching it:
https://time.com/6146419/inventing-anna-rachel-williams-anna-delvey/
The person who wrote that article WROTE A BOOK. She’s being hypocritical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I won't be watching it:
https://time.com/6146419/inventing-anna-rachel-williams-anna-delvey/
The person who wrote that article WROTE A BOOK. She’s being hypocritical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sounds awful and got terrible reviews. Also she was paid for it, and I don't want to support that little piece of shit.
Actually under son of Sam laws the people she defrauded got the money from Netflix.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love it! But damn the accent is so bad and changes nonstop.
+1
I've only seen a trailer, so I'll have to actually watch the real thing, but it seemed like Julia Garner's accent was a mashup of Ruth and some weird Euro-trash accent.